H. Hunger, Eating, and Health - Part 2 Flashcards
Describe 2 types of environmental stim that can influence eating
- sensory stim = smelling/seeing food
- social stim = when sitting at a table or w/ friends
a) describe pre-meal hunger
b) what are the 2 theories used to cause this?
a) the hunger that one feels right before a meal
b)
- set pt = you feel hungry when you are calorie deficient
- positive-incentive = you feel hungry as a result of the anticipation of eating itself (ie flavour of food)
describe an experiment that proves that pre-meal hunger can be conditioned (phase 1, 2, + conclu)
phase 1 = provide specifically timed meals for rats. While they are given the food a light and buzzer play
phase 2 = now make the food readily available all the time. If you play the light and the buzzer the rats immediately go and eat the food despite having been regularly eating the whole day.
Conclusion = the light + buzzer were paired the food being given thus they were played they made the rats feel hungry in preparation for an upcoming meal (pre-meal hunger)
What are the 2 kinds of hunger stimulations? - 4
- hypoglycemia = low levels of glucose in the blood
- low lipid levels in blood = low FAs
Match the following terms to Glucose or Fats
a) hypoglycemia
b) lipoprivation
c) glucoprivic hunger
d) low lipids/FAs
e) lipoprivic hunger
f) glucoprivation
Glucose = a, f, c
Fats = d, b, e
a) What are the 2 parts of the body that are considered hunger stimulation detectors?
b) what type of hunger stimulation is it sensitive to?
- brain = sensitive to glucoprivation (glucose)
- liver = glucoprivation + lipoprivation (glucose + lipids)
T or F - glucoprivation and lipoprivation triggers hunger due to the body being deficient in these major macromolecules
F - these stimulations are just that there is a low level of glucose/FAs in the blood but there is still plenty that can be resorbed through the liver/adipose tissue
Describe the fxn of the satiety signal
a signal that results in use feeling full
Wrt the sham rat study
a) What was the purpose?
b) how did they test this?
c) What were the 2 groups involved?
d) what were the results found for each group?
e) What was the conclusion for this exp?
a) to see if nutrient density impact how much we eat
b) They cut the esophagus from the stomach thus everything that the rats ate would never reach the stomach
c) Sham rats eating unfamiliar food + sham rats eating familiar food
d) the rats that ate the familiar food did not change eat more at first but then INC what they ate over time. Whiles the rats that ate the unfamiliar food ate more right from the beginning.
e) The familiarity of the diet drives how much we eat more so than the nutritional density.
Describe the 3 factors that influence how much we eat
- serving size = bigger portions lead to eating more
- appetizer effect = eating smaller portions of food increase hunger by activating the cephalic phase
- social influences = the presence of ppl has a huge influence on how much we eat (sometimes more sometime less)
a) Which factor relates to the cafeteria diet? - 1
b) What is the cafeteria diet? - 1
c) does it result in eating more or less? why? - 2
a) the appetizer effect
b) the idea of having a variety of foods available all at once
c) the more variety of foods available results in more eating b/c we will not get bored of the flavor as there are more options. As opposed to eating one type of food w/ one flavour
a) Describe sensory-specific satiety? - 1
b) why do we have this?
a) the act of getting bored of a flavour that you are experiencing right now causing you to be satiated (reduced incentive value) for that specific food that contains that flavour
b) an evolutionary adaptation to encourage the intake of differ foods in order to get more nutrients
T or F - the sensory-specific satiety states that eating one type of food results in an INC of incentive value of that food as it triggers the appetizer effect
F - you get bored of the flavour and thus have an INC incentive value for other types of foods instead
T or F - satiety signals only relate to factors that influence how much you eat
F - they also relate to factors that influence what and when you eat
What are the 3 pieces of evidence that show that intention to eat triggers a decline in blood glucose?
- right b/f eating blood glucose levels DEC
- the act of removing blood glucose does not stop one from eating
- if you skip a meal the blood glucose levels will rise back up