Groups & Teams II Flashcards
common knowledge effect- influence
- information that is shared by members has more influence on team decision making
– occurs regardless of the validity of the information
Common information effect- discussion
is discussed for longer periods of time
– unique info is not given enough time
overcoming common knowledge
- best practices for team decision making
- put all information on table before people vote or give initial preferences
- steer conversation to unique information
- put focus on making decision that is best for team and not on having your choice “win”
cohesion
- the degree of camaraderie within the team; social glue or shared bond.
factors that predict cohesion
- similarity
- time: the longer a group stays together, the more cohesive it tends to be
- size: smaller groups tend to have higher levels of cohesion
Benefits of cohesion
- higher levels of productivity
- members are generally more satisfied and more invested
- members support one another and more likely to preserve through challenging situations
If too much cohesion (belonging overly valued)
- if belonging is valued over all else, people will modify their behaviors to keep in line with the majority
Groupthink
avoid critical evaluation of ideas the group favors
groupthink fear
even if disagree, people fear they will become marginalized for daring to disagree with group.
overcoming group think
- actively seek disconfirming evidence
- assign a devil’s advocate
- bring a neutral, third party
- create psychological safety
Psychological safety
- belief held by team members on whether it’s okay to take risk
- “can I express my ideas? Can I ask questions? Can I admit mistakes without fear of negative consequences?
teams without psychological safety
consistently underperform
- It is leader’s job to encourage different opinions and explain why everyone’s voice matters
Social Loafing
- people put in less effort when working in a group context
social loafing in big group
as the number of group members increase, the effort of each member typically decreases.
- diffusion of responsibility as group gets a larger as it is easier to deflect blame if group fails
- no one will notice anyway
overcoming social loafing
- limit number of individuals needed
- task identity: peer evaluations of individual’s contribution
- Task significance: loafing is less likely when members believe what they are doing is highly important