Diversity and Inclusion I Flashcards
diversity
ways in which people are different from each other
inclusion
people can bring their unique aspects while still being treated as insiders
surface-level diversity
traits that are highly visible ex. race, gender, age
deep-level diversity
traits underneath the surface that are harder to observe ex. values, beliefs, and attitudes
similarity- attraction phenomenon
tendency to be more attracted to individuals who are similar to self.
- people allocate greater resources and more positive attitudes
Similarity attraction ph. con
problematic for minority group members in organizations
- they have fewer people to receive same level of assistance or mentorship
resume whitening
minority job applicants deleting references to their race
- whitened resumes are more likely to receive request for interviews
Blind hiring
music industry started to have anonymous auditions– greater employment of women
Mentorship
employees often get ahead in organizations through having a powerful mentor
- they acquire tactic info. and other intangible opportunities
people are more likely to adopt mentees who are similar to them
promotions
women constitute about 50% of work force. men are 4X more likely to reach highest positions
- 10 of fortune 500 co. are led by women
pay gap
unexplainable by differences in job performance still remains
stereotypes
- generalizations of a particular group of people.
- mere existence of stereotypes can enhance or diminish job performance
- stereotypes often lead to unfair and inaccurate decision making and attributions
stereotypes faultlines
attribute along which a group is split into subgroups
- members of different subgroups may avoid communicating with each other
- teams w faultlines tend to experience more conflict, less cohesion, and worse performance
faultlines ex.
3 Asian women and 3 Caucasian men (a split)
vs
2 Asian females, 2 Caucasian males, 1 Asian male, 1 Caucasian females
overcome faultlines
- do best to avoid obvious and natural divisions based on social categories
- emphasize shared purpose and identity
- create team based rewards
diversity pros
- higher creativity and decision making
- better understanding of customers
- more adaptability
- higher co. performance
diversity cons
- social conflict
- poor communication
- loss of trust
- high status differences
- feelings of injustice
diversity real meaning
having a distribution of differences on a particular dimension
- have to be specific about what dimension
- whether diversity is good or bad depends on what referring to
information access:
difference on a feature that represents unique feature that represents unique KSAs
variety
composition of information access demographics and functional background
variety frequently predicted outcomes
- higher creativity
- greater flexibility
- higher decision making
separation
composition of feeling: differences that represent where one stands on issue.
- values, attitudes, beliefs
separation frequently predicted outcomes
- less: cohesion, trust, and social disintegration
Disparity
composition of dominance: differences on a feature of something that we own
- pay, power, status
Disparity frequently predicted outcomes
- higher competition
- lower levels of motivation
- counterproductive
building variety
draw from different social circles
- randomly assign groups
- assign someone who does not have relevant task knowledge
create effective norms
- emphasize team identity
- low- stakes, acquaintance activity
- always poll everyone
avoiding separation
build social bridges
- identify someone who can bridge sub-groups
- have employees engage in perspective taking and identify advantages of other’s position
reducing disparity
increase input opportunities for all members
- regular rotation of leadership roles and responsibilities
- allow for anonymous input and feedback
managing variety
variety: generates “good” conflict that can lead to necessary discussions on how to move forward
- separation/disparity
managing separation/disparity
generates “bad” conflict and can stifle variety. Good leaders actively identify and address potential for separation and disparity.