Distributive Negotiations Flashcards
BATNA: best alternative to a negotiated agreement
represents the best available outcome if you were to walk away from the current negotiation, plan b or next best option.
BATNA leverage
is your biggest source of leverage in distributive negotiation.
- conversely, a weak BATNA makes it harder to obtain your desired outcome
Signaling BATNA
- best course of action might instead be signal your BATNA and avoid giving your BATNA away explicitly
Reservation Price - 3
- represents the highest (lowest) point a buyer (seller) is willing to go.
- walkaway point. Beyond the reservation price, you would prefer no agreement.
- also represents your point of indifference for whether you will accept a deal or purse your BATNA
revealing reservation price
- never reveal your reservation price
- if your reservation price becomes known, the other part can push for an agreement that is only marginally acceptable to you
reservation price change during negotiation
- your reservation price should not change unless BATNA or terms of deal substantively change
Reservation price before
-it is imperative to have a clearly defined, quantifiable reservation price before you start negotiating
BATNA vs. Reservation Price
- BATNA helps establish your reservation price
- Reservation price should be close to your BATNA, but not necessarily the same
Reservation Price can differ.
reservation price can be different across people because it includes personal factors.
- opportunity costs, switching costs
- personal values (brand loyalty, sense of pride)
ZOPA: zone of possible agreement
- represents the bargaining zone between the buyer’s reservation price and seller’s reservation price
- if the buyer’s reservation price > or = to the seller’s reservation price, a zone of possible agreement exists (positive bargaining zone)
Zopa zone
between Seller— buyer’s reservation price
Negative Bargaining Zone
If buyer’s reservation price is smaller or equal to the seller’s reservation price, there is no possible agreement.
- In reality, people regularly violate their reservation prices and reach agreement.
Agreement Bias
tendency to agree or settle in a negotiation even if the outcome is disadvantages.
Factors that contribute to settling
- failure to properly identify reservation price
- snuck cost fallacy
- desire to maintain positive image
Target Price
represents the ideal outcome