Experiments Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Baddeley coding 1966

A

Given 4 different lists of words, e.g acoustically similar, dissimilar and semantically similar and dissimilar and were asked to recall. Accoustically similar worse recall (STM) semantically similar worse recall (LTM)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Jacobs Digital span

A

Recall 4 digits in order then if correct recall 5. Mean span is 9.3 digits and 7.3 letters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Miller 1956 chunking and span

A

Noted the importance of 7’s, 7 musical notes, 7 days of the week, 7 deadly sins. STM span is +/- 7.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cowan 2001

A

Says Miller may have over estimated STM, Capacity is only 4 chunks so 5 is more believable than 7

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Peterson and Peterson 1959

A

24 undergraduates given 8 trials. Each given consonant syllable and a 3 digit. Count back from 3 digit number and do each trial at different times. It shows STM has short duration unless info repeated regularly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bahrick et al 1975

A

RPS could recognise the names and faces of classmates from 50 years ago. It shows that long term memory is coded semantically.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mcgeoch and Mcdonald 1931

A

Studied retro active interference. RPS given a word list to recall, when 100% accurate given another. Lists that were similar results in a worse recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tulving 1983

A

Suggested that if a cue is needed it must be presented at encoding and retrieval

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Golden and Baddeley 1975

A

Worked with deep sea divers. Made divers learn and recall word lists on sea and land. Mismatched environment gave the worse recall. 40% lower recall in mismatched environments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Carter and Cassidy 1998

A

State dependent forgetting. Similar to Golden experiment but with drugs. Mismatching gives worse recall.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Barker et al

A

Similar experiment to Golden and Carter but with gum. 4 groups- 15 words in two minutes, recall straight away and then again in 24 hours- immediate recall shows small difference between the groups but later recall suggests memory best with both gum- worse in mismatched conditons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Loftus and Palmer 1974

A

PP’s watched clips of car accidents. Asked a leading question which focused on the word “hit” or “smash”. Leads them to believe the car was going fast. Leading questions affect memory as when PP were asked was there any smashed class those who heard smash were most likely to say yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Gobbert et al 2003

A

PP’s were shown car accidents from different angles. They were allowed to talk to each other after. 71% of PP’s recalled aspects of the video that they were not shown in comparison to 0% in the control group. Links to memory conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Anastafi and Rhodes

A

18-25/35-45 year olds are more accurate than 55-78 year olds in EWT but all age groups were accurate when identifying their own age group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Johnson and Scott 1976

A

Lab experiment. People over hear an argument and the second group hear the argument accompanied by glass. Some see man walk past with pen, others with a knife with blood on it. 49% of people can identify man with pen from group of 50 and 33% can identify man with knife.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Pickles 1998

A

Did an experiment with scissors, handgun, wallet and chicken. EW is worse when it is unusual conditions. Weapon focus may have no relevance

17
Q

Fisher et al 1987

A

Must maintain eye contact during an interview to minimise anxiety and distractions.

18
Q

Yuille and Cutshall

A

Studied a real life shooting in Vancouver where shop keeper shot thief dead. 13 witnesses agreed to take part. Interviews held 4-5 months after event. Accuracy was measured with number of details. Those who reported being more stressed had an accuracy of 88% compared to those who weren’t 75%

19
Q

Fisher and Geiselman 1992

A

Argued EWT could be improved using these techniques
Report everything- might be irrelevant but could trigger other memories
Reinstate the context- picture environment and emotions
Reverse the perspective- change the recall order to minimise expectations and dishonesty
Change respective- tell the account from another persons view

20
Q

Milne and Bull 2002

A

Each cognitive element used singularly produced more evidence than standard methods. report everything and reinstate context produced best recall when paired together

21
Q

Clifasefi et al 2013

A

PP given a personalised food and drink document based on their earlier response to a questionnaire . Some included false info e.g. how they were drunk u16 and were sick. They then had a memory test where they were asked if they had ever been sick as a result of consuming to much alcohol. Significant difference in number who recalled being sick and said they didn’t like certain drinks

22
Q

Underwood and postman 1960

A

Split PP’s into 2 groups. Both given a paired word list to learn. Group 2 given second word list where the first word is the same as the first word in list 1. Both tested on first word list given first word of each pair. Control group= better recall

23
Q

Baddeley 1997 questioning context

A

Context effects are not strong in real life

You could learn something in one room and go into another and still remember

24
Q

Cone and spine 1980

A

Agree that procedural memory is separate but believes EM AND SM are together

25
Q

Baddeley and hitch 1977

A

Rugby player experiment
Teams played a season in order not all players were at every match
Not important how long ago the match was but if a player was there
Last team played =best recall
Demonstrates interference can apply to real life situations

26
Q

Baddeley 1975

A

Dual Task performance, Participants had difficulty doing two visual tasks- describing F and tracking light- because both tasks competed for the same slave system

27
Q

Tulving and Psotka 1974

A

Participants given 5 lists of 24 words e.g hut, bee, hill
Weren’t told category for lists but it should have been obvious for participants
Recall = 70% but fell when additional lists were added
Recalls rose back to 70% when categories were given as a cue