evaluation of Sutherland's differential association theory- limitations Flashcards
what is a limitation of Sutherland’s differential association theory?
(relating to individuals)
not individualistic
why is Sutherland’s differential association theory not being individualistic a limitation?
not everyone is equally influenced by peer groups
the theory suggests that everyone is influenced in some way by reinforcements
what is an example of Sutherland’s differential association theory being not individualistic a limitation?
some people will leave gangs despite losing approval from them
what is another limitation of Sutherland’s differential association theory?
(relating to vs )
‘nurture’ wins over ‘nature vs ‘nurture’
why is ‘nurture’ a limitation in Sutherland’s differential association theory?
ignores the role of biology
if the groups are family they seek approval from them and have inherited their genes
narrow view on ex offending behaviour
what is a limitation of Sutherland’s differential association theory?
(relating to cause and effect)
low validity
due to cause and effect not being determined
why is low validity a limitation in Sutherland’s differential association theory?
individuals could only start to show criminal behaviour because it is valued and demonstrated in their social groups
it could equally be that people who already hold deviant values gravitate towards each other
it could be a consequence rather than a cause
what is a final limitation of Sutherland’s differential association theory?
(relating to behaviour)
reductionist
what is Sutherland’s differential association theory being reductionist a limitation?
reduces complex human behaviour
need to consider a variety of influential factors