Emotional/Social Development in Adolescence (ch. 12) Flashcards
self esteem typically _____ in mid to late adolescence
rises
identity achievement
commitment to values and goals following period of exploration
identity moratorium
exploration w/o having reached commitment
identity foreclosure
commitment in the absence of exploration
ex. parent forcing child to become a doctor
identity diffusion
characterized by lack of both exploration and commitment
3 ways society can help minority adolescents resolve identity conflicts
promote effective parenting
ensure schools respect minority youths’ language
contact with youths within ethnicity
in morality, females emphasize _________ while males stress _______
care; justice/care
youths who volunteer in their communities gain….
moral maturity and likely to engage in future service
effective parenting
balances connection and separation
promotes autonomy in adolescence
cliques vs crowd
clique - 5-7 people who are friends
crowd - several cliques with similar values together (ex. high school)
early- vs late-onset type to adolescent delinquency
e - inherit traits that predispose them to aggressiveness
l - start displaying behavior around puberty and show gradual increase from there
components in moral development
emotional - feels about things
behavioral - observable/acts on things
cognitive - thinks about things
example of biological theory of moral development
with altruism, more likely to help people we are related to
freud’s phallic period
boys superego forms during oedipus conflict
- thought as clean
girls superego forms during electra conflict
stages of moral reasoning (piaget)
moral realism (4-7 years)
- focus on rules as unchanging
- not much understanding of intention
- belief in immanent justice
morality of reciprocity (10 yrs and up)
- understand rules can be changed
- understand intention
immanent justice
think if you do something bad then something bad that happens to you is an effect/”karma”
ex) if you steal something then fall down stairs, one caused the other
story with moral reasoning (piaget)
phillip wants a cookie, mom says no but takes one anyway, breaking one cup in the process
john is called for dinner, opens the door and breaks 12 cups in the process
who is more guilty? children in moral realism will say john as he broke more cups while children in morality of reciprocity will say phillip as he disobeyed mom