DLBCL facts Flashcards
Immunophenotype of DLBCL
CD20, CD19, CD79a
GCB- CD10 + , Bcl6 +
Non GCB- CD10-, MUM1 +
IPI DLBCL
LDH
Age 60
Advanced stage
> 1 extranodal site
sensitivity of Hans criteria in DLBCL
70-80%
should not determine TX
Lymph2Cx assay in DLBCL
LymphoGen
Nano-string gene profiling
better sensitivity for subclassification for GCB/non GCB
ctDNA DLBCL
Better in detecting minimal disease than imaging. not clinically available
Pts with most benefit from pola in DLBCL
Age> 60
IPI 3-5
ABC
approved for IPI>1
CART in 1st line DLBCL
R-CHOP lead of 1-2 cycles
High risk pts
ZUMA12 (high IPI, DH or positive interim PET)
ZUMA23 (high risk pts)
Tafasitamab in 1st line DLBCL
CD19 Ab
Front-MIND
Tafa-len 1st line trial vs RCHOP
Investigational
Result pending
2nd line CART in DLBCL
Axi-cell (CD28) ZUMA7
OS
Liso-cell (4-1BB)- less toxic TRANSFORM
CART trials in DLBCL
Axi
ZUMA7- 2nd line
bridging with steroids only
OS advantage
ZUMA1- 3rd line
Liso
TRANSFORM- 2nd line
TRANSCEND- 3rd line
Tisa
BELINDA- 2nd line- negative trial
JULIET- 3rd line
VH4-34 IgH gene phonotype in DLBCL
ABC
poor prognosis
Advantage of geriatric assessment in DLBCL
Better identifies pts above/below age 80 as fit/unfit/frail
X6 RCHOP vs 8X RCHOPin DLBCL
GOYA trial
same effectiveness
GCSF support in RCHOP
Primary prophylaxis in age > 6
Or comorbities, prior infections, prior cytopenias
Polatuzumab in 1st line DLBCL
6X RCHP + 2XR
vs RCHOP
76% vs 70% 2 year PFS
no OS
advantage in ABC, IPI >3, Age>60
higher rates of febrile neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy
Tafa+ Len 1st line in DLBCL
L-MIND
2nd-3rd line
compared to len
60% ORR CR 40%
median PFS 12 months
well tolerated