Chapter 3: Evidence-Based Nutrition and Practice Flashcards
A proposed explanation for a problem or set of observations.
Hypothesis
The process of formulating explanations about the natural world and testing those explanations with experiments and data.
The Scientific Method
A three-pronged approach to working with clients, which consists of making decisions based on the weight of the scientific evidence, field observations, and individual client needs and preferences.
Evidence-Based Practice
Steps of the Scientific Method
1: Identify a problem or set of observations
2: Formulate a hypothesis
3: Design a study to test the hypothesis
4: Collect, synthesize, and interpret data
5: Discard or change hypothesis if data doesn’t support it OR continue testing data that supports the hypothesis.
An expected outcome generated from a hypothesis.
Prediction
True or False: Scientists identify what is most likely to be true by demonstrating what is not true.
True
A hypothesis or set of hypotheses for which a large body of high-quality evidence has been accumulated.
Theory
An account of a person’s experience or event.
Anecdote
A variable in an experiment that a scientist makes no effort to manipulate or account for.
Uncontrolled Variable
Original research where scientists perform experiments and collect data – this is in contrast to secondary research where scientists analyze data that has already been collected or published elsewhere.
Primary Research
Research in which a researcher observes ongoing behaviors to determine correlation.
Observational Research
A relationship between two or more variables.
Correlation
A type of scientific study/trial where participants are randomly assigned into different groups – one or more will be the intervention to be tested and one will be the control group. Groups are randomized and a control is used in an attempt to reduce potential bias in the trial.
Randomized Control Trial (RCT)
The variable scientists manipulate in an experiment.
Independent Variable
The ability to generalize the results of a study.
External Validity
A review where scientists systematically gather all research on a topic and evaluate it based on predefined criteria and rules.
Systematic Review
A statistical analysis of a group of studies to assess the overall weight of the evidence. It is an analysis of RCTs.
Meta-Analysis
What 2 reviews represent the highest evidence level because they give the consensus on the best research.
Meta-analysis (RCTs) and systematic review
True or False: A scientific theory is just a guess.
False