book CASE LAW

Question 0

1. Florida vs. bostick.

Answer 0

1. Permitted Warrantless sweeps of inner city busses

Question 1

1. Graham vs. Conner.

Answer 1

1. The federal standard for police use of force. The case established OBJECTIVELY REASONABLE.

Question 2

County of riverside vs. McLaughlin.

Answer 2

Determined that if the detention of a suspect is longer then 48 hours without a hearing. Then the burden of proof shifts to the police to prove reasonableness.
If shorter the burden of proof for reasonableness shifts to the suspect.

48 hours is presumably reasonable.

Question 3

Terry vs. Ohio

Answer 3

A police officer may stop a person for questioning is the officer reasonably suspects that the suspect has committed , is committing , it is about to commit a crime. Officer does not need probably cause.

Question 4

Tennessee vs garner

Answer 4

Fleeing Felon rule.

Question 5

Mapp vs Ohio.

Answer 5

The exclusionary rule.

Question 6

Nix vs Williams.

Answer 6

Inevitable discovery

Question 7

Cheedle vs BARWELL.

Answer 7

Best evidence rule. Notes for court original notes.

Question 8

Arenson vs. Jackson.

Answer 8

Best evidence rule. Photocopied notes

Question 9

Cleaning blood use what part chlorine bleach to what part water.

Answer 9

1 chlorine to

10 water

Question 10

Minick vs Mississippi

Answer 10

After council is requested by s defendant. Law enforcement must stop questioning and can not start again unless attorney is present or the defendant initiates the conversation

Question 11

Minnesota vs Murphy.

Answer 11

Privations officers do not need to mirandize their clients

Question 12

Berkemer vs mccarty

Answer 12

Miranda is not needed during traffic tickets issuance

Question 13

Oregon vs elstead

Answer 13

Confessions after Miranda are admissible

Question 14

Davis vs United States

Answer 14

Clarifying if a suspect says maybe I want a lawyer

Question 15

California vs prysock

Answer 15

Miranda warnings need not be given in order