3.5: Short-term separation Flashcards
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks)
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
What happens if an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this?
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
What does the internal working model do?
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and what do Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include?
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include:
- Delinquency
- Low IQ
- Affectionless psychopathy
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
What does Bowlby argue?
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
How can disruptions occur?
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways:
- Short-term separation
- Long-term deprivation
- Privation
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
How did Bowlby describe the distress caused by short-term separation?
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves:
- Protest
- Despair
- Detachment
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
First AO3 PEEL paragraph
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
Example
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
What does this suggest?
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
Second AO3 PEEL paragraph
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
Example
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
Why does this suggest that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid?
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but what?
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, why?
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
Third AO3 PEEL paragraph
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby used the term ‘critical period’
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby used the term ‘critical period.’
However, what?
However, later research has shown that damage is not inevitable and it may just be a sensitive period instead
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby used the term ‘critical period.’
However, later research has shown that damage is not inevitable and it may just be a sensitive period instead.
Example
For example, Koluchova (1976) reported the case of twin boys from Czechoslovakia who were isolated from the age of 18 months until they were 7 years old.
Subsequently, there were looked after by 2 loving adults and appeared to recover fully