3.5: Short-term separation Flashcards
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks)
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
What happens if an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this?
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
What does the internal working model do?
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and what do Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include?
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include:
- Delinquency
- Low IQ
- Affectionless psychopathy
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
What does Bowlby argue?
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
How can disruptions occur?
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways:
- Short-term separation
- Long-term deprivation
- Privation
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
How did Bowlby describe the distress caused by short-term separation?
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves:
- Protest
- Despair
- Detachment
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
First AO3 PEEL paragraph
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
Example
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
What does this suggest?
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
Second AO3 PEEL paragraph
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
Example
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
Why does this suggest that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid?
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but what?
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, why?
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
Third AO3 PEEL paragraph
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby used the term ‘critical period’
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby used the term ‘critical period.’
However, what?
However, later research has shown that damage is not inevitable and it may just be a sensitive period instead
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby used the term ‘critical period.’
However, later research has shown that damage is not inevitable and it may just be a sensitive period instead.
Example
For example, Koluchova (1976) reported the case of twin boys from Czechoslovakia who were isolated from the age of 18 months until they were 7 years old.
Subsequently, there were looked after by 2 loving adults and appeared to recover fully
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby used the term ‘critical period.’
However, later research has shown that damage is not inevitable and it may just be a sensitive period instead.
For example, Koluchova (1976) reported the case of twin boys from Czechoslovakia who were isolated from the age of 18 months until they were 7 years old.
Subsequently, there were looked after by 2 loving adults and appeared to recover fully.
What do cases like this show?
Cases like this show that the period identified by Bowlby may be a ‘sensitive’ one, but it cannot be critical
Discuss Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby believed that infants form a single attachment and that there is a critical period for this.
If an attachment is disrupted or not formed after this, it is too late - The consequences cannot be reversed.
The internal working model forms a template for later relationships and Bowlby’s consequences of maternal deprivation include delinquency, low IQ and affectionless psychopathy.
Bowlby argues that disruption of the attachment bond, even short-term disruptions, results in serious, permanent damage to a child’s emotional, cognitive and social development.
Disruptions can occur in 3 basic ways - Short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.
Bowlby described the distress caused by short-term separation in terms of the PDD model, the 3 stages babies go through when a caregiver leaves - Protest, Despair and Detachment.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is research support for Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation.
For example, Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is valid.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that However, there is contradictory research.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation isn’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby used the term ‘critical period.’
However, later research has shown that damage is not inevitable and it may just be a sensitive period instead.
For example, Koluchova (1976) reported the case of twin boys from Czechoslovakia who were isolated from the age of 18 months until they were 7 years old.
Subsequently, there were looked after by 2 loving adults and appeared to recover fully.
Cases like this show that the period identified by Bowlby may be a ‘sensitive’ one, but it cannot be critical.
Therefore, what?
Therefore, Bowlby’s theory of maternal deprivation is not valid
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks)
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Who did Koluchova report on?
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, what happened?
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
Where was the father?
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age what?
Discovered at age 7
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins what?
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
What happened to the boys?
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then what?
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, what?
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
What did Koluchova document in 1991?
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
What is the conclusion of this case study?
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
First AO3 PEEL paragraph
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
What may there have been?
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency.
Example
For example, the immediate cause of the separation (such as neglect or abuse) might have been the direct cause of problems experienced at adolescence, rather than the separation itself
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency.
For example, the immediate cause of the separation (such as neglect or abuse) might have been the direct cause of problems experienced at adolescence, rather than the separation itself.
Second AO3 PEEL paragraph
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is also contradictory research for Bowlby’s study
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency.
For example, the immediate cause of the separation (such as neglect or abuse) might have been the direct cause of problems experienced at adolescence, rather than the separation itself.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is also contradictory research for Bowlby’s study.
Example
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency.
For example, the immediate cause of the separation (such as neglect or abuse) might have been the direct cause of problems experienced at adolescence, rather than the separation itself.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is also contradictory research for Bowlby’s study.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
Why does this suggest that Bowlby’s findings aren’t valid?
This suggests that Bowlby’s findings aren’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency.
For example, the immediate cause of the separation (such as neglect or abuse) might have been the direct cause of problems experienced at adolescence, rather than the separation itself.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is also contradictory research for Bowlby’s study.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s findings aren’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but why is Bowlby’s 44 thieves study high in validity?
This suggests that Bowlby’s findings aren’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency.
For example, the immediate cause of the separation (such as neglect or abuse) might have been the direct cause of problems experienced at adolescence, rather than the separation itself.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is also contradictory research for Bowlby’s study.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s findings aren’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
Third AO3 PEEL paragraph
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that another limitation of Bowlby’s study is investigator effects
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency.
For example, the immediate cause of the separation (such as neglect or abuse) might have been the direct cause of problems experienced at adolescence, rather than the separation itself.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is also contradictory research for Bowlby’s study.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s findings aren’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that another limitation of Bowlby’s study is investigator effects.
What did Bowlby do himself?
Bowlby designed and conducted the self-reports himself
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency.
For example, the immediate cause of the separation (such as neglect or abuse) might have been the direct cause of problems experienced at adolescence, rather than the separation itself.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is also contradictory research for Bowlby’s study.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s findings aren’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that another limitation of Bowlby’s study is investigator effects.
Bowlby designed and conducted the self-reports himself and as a result, what?
Bowlby designed and conducted the self-reports himself and as a result, his presence and interpretation might have influenced the outcome of the research
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency.
For example, the immediate cause of the separation (such as neglect or abuse) might have been the direct cause of problems experienced at adolescence, rather than the separation itself.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is also contradictory research for Bowlby’s study.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s findings aren’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that another limitation of Bowlby’s study is investigator effects.
Bowlby designed and conducted the self-reports himself and as a result, his presence and interpretation might have influenced the outcome of the research.
What might Bowlby’s diagnosis of affectionless psychopathy have been distorted by?
Bowlby’s diagnosis of affectionless psychopathy might have been distorted by researcher confirmation bias
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency.
For example, the immediate cause of the separation (such as neglect or abuse) might have been the direct cause of problems experienced at adolescence, rather than the separation itself.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is also contradictory research for Bowlby’s study.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s findings aren’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that another limitation of Bowlby’s study is investigator effects.
Bowlby designed and conducted the self-reports himself and as a result, his presence and interpretation might have influenced the outcome of the research.
Bowlby’s diagnosis of affectionless psychopathy might have been distorted by researcher confirmation bias.
Fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph
The fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Koluchova’s study was an in-depth case study where a lot of data was gathered and measures such as IQ tests were used
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency.
For example, the immediate cause of the separation (such as neglect or abuse) might have been the direct cause of problems experienced at adolescence, rather than the separation itself.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is also contradictory research for Bowlby’s study.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s findings aren’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that another limitation of Bowlby’s study is investigator effects.
Bowlby designed and conducted the self-reports himself and as a result, his presence and interpretation might have influenced the outcome of the research.
Bowlby’s diagnosis of affectionless psychopathy might have been distorted by researcher confirmation bias.
The fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Koluchova’s study was an in-depth case study where a lot of data was gathered and measures such as IQ tests were used, so what?
The fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Koluchova’s study was an in-depth case study where a lot of data was gathered and measures such as IQ tests were used, so it is likely that the data about the real-life situation of the twins is valid
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency.
For example, the immediate cause of the separation (such as neglect or abuse) might have been the direct cause of problems experienced at adolescence, rather than the separation itself.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is also contradictory research for Bowlby’s study.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s findings aren’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that another limitation of Bowlby’s study is investigator effects.
Bowlby designed and conducted the self-reports himself and as a result, his presence and interpretation might have influenced the outcome of the research.
Bowlby’s diagnosis of affectionless psychopathy might have been distorted by researcher confirmation bias.
The fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Koluchova’s study was an in-depth case study where a lot of data was gathered and measures such as IQ tests were used, so it is likely that the data about the real-life situation of the twins is valid.
What does this mean?
This means that the results can be applied to real-life
Outline research into maternal deprivation (16 marks).
Bowlby (1944) compared 44 juvenile thieves with a control group of non-criminal, but emotionally disturbed young people.
32% of the thieves showed affectionless psychopathy and 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged early maternal separation.
In the control group, only 2 had had such a separation.
Koluchova reported on identical twins whose mother died soon after their birth.
When their father remarried, the stepmother locked them in a cellar for 5 and a half years.
The father was mainly absent from the home, due to his job.
Discovered at age 7, the twins lacked speech and were underdeveloped physically.
The boys were given physical therapy and put into a school for children with severe learning difficulties and were then adopted by 2 child-centred sisters.
At age 14, their intellectual, social, emotional and behavioural functioning was near normal.
Koluchova documented in 1991 that as adults, both married and had children.
They were happy and stable and had warm relationships with their families.
The conclusion of this case study is that the effects of privation are reversible.
The first AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Bowlby found a relationship between early separation and affectionless psychopathy/delinquency, but we cannot definitively conclude that the separation was the cause.
There may have been a third unidentified variable that accounted for the affectionless psychopathy/delinquency.
For example, the immediate cause of the separation (such as neglect or abuse) might have been the direct cause of problems experienced at adolescence, rather than the separation itself.
The second AO3 PEEL paragraph is that there is also contradictory research for Bowlby’s study.
For example, Lewis (1954) partially replicated Bowlby’s 44 thieves study on a larger scale, looking at 500 young people.
In her sample, a history of early prolonged maternal separation did not predict criminality or difficulty forming close relationships.
This suggests that Bowlby’s findings aren’t valid, because other factors may affect the outcome of early maternal deprivation, but Bowlby’s 44 thieves study is high in validity, as case studies provide rich and insightful data.
The third AO3 PEEL paragraph is that another limitation of Bowlby’s study is investigator effects.
Bowlby designed and conducted the self-reports himself and as a result, his presence and interpretation might have influenced the outcome of the research.
Bowlby’s diagnosis of affectionless psychopathy might have been distorted by researcher confirmation bias.
The fourth AO3 PEEL paragraph is that Koluchova’s study was an in-depth case study where a lot of data was gathered and measures such as IQ tests were used, so it is likely that the data about the real-life situation of the twins is valid.
This means that the results can be applied to real-life, why?
This means that the results can be applied to real-life, as they can be generalised to other children
