12. Management Flashcards
Fayol: the 5 functions of management
1. Planning
All managers need to think ahead. Senior management will establish overall objectives and these will be translated into tactical objectives for less senior managers. The planning needed to put these objectives into effect is also important. For example, new production or marketing objectives will require the planning and preparation of sufficient resources.
2. Organising resources to meet objectives
Employees need to be recruited carefully and encouraged, via delegation, to take some authority and accept some accountability. Senior managers should ensure that the structure of the business allows for a clear division of tasks. Each functional department, such as marketing, is organised to allow employees to work towards the common objectives.
3. Commanding, directing and motivating employees
This means guiding, leading and overseeing employees to ensure that business objectives are being met. Employee development will help motivate employees to use all of their abilities at work. Managers should be capable of motivating a team and encouraging employees to show initiative.
4. Coordinating activities
As businesses grow there is a greater need to ensure consistency and coordination between different parts of the business. The goals of each branch, division, region and employee must be welded together to achieve a common sense of purpose. At a practical level, this avoids the situation where, for example, two divisions of the same company both spend money on researching into the same new product, resulting in wasteful duplication of effort.
5. Controlling and measuring performance against targets
Establishing clear objectives for the business, and for each section within it, establishes targets for all groups, divisions and individuals. It is management’s responsibility to appraise performance against
targets and to take action if underperformance occurs. It is just as important to provide positive feedback when things go right.
Mintzberg management roles
1. Interpersonal roles – dealing with and motivating employees at all levels of the organisation.
* Fiqurehead - symbolic leader of the organisation, undertaking duties of a social or legal nature
* Leader - motivating subordinates; selecting and training other managers/workers
* Liaison - linking with managers and leaders of other divisions of the business and other organisations
2. Informational roles – acting as a source, receiver and transmitter of information.
* Monitor - collecting data relevant to the business’s operations
* Disseminator - sending information collected from external and internal sources to the relevant people within the organisation
* Spokeperson - communicating information about the organisation – its current position and achievements – to external groups and people
3. Decisional roles – taking decisions and allocating resources to meet the organisation’s objectives.
* Entrepreneur - looking for new opportunities to develop the business
* Disturbance handler - responding to changing situations that may put the business at risk; assuming responsibility when threatening factors develop
* Resource allocator -deciding on the spending of the organisation’s financial resources and the allocation of its physical and human resources
* Negotiator - representing the organisation in all important negotiations (e.g. with government)
Differences between Fayol and Mintzberg’s approaches
The differences between the approaches of Fayol and Mintzberg should not be exaggerated. Mintzberg did not strongly disagree with Fayol. He just thought that the simple division of managerial tasks into five functions was too closed and limiting. He considered that the role of managers was much more open ended. In particular he stressed the interpersonal nature of many of the tasks that the managers he observed were performing. Mintzberg believed that he had demonstrated, through his systematic framework, that management is much more than the five functions. It must include interpersonal relationships and open-ended discussions with workers and customers.
Autocratic management
* Features
- leader takes all decisions
- they give little information to workers
- they supervise workers closely
- only one-way communication is used
- workers are given only limited information about the business
Autocratic management
* Applications
- defence forces and police where quick decisions are needed and the scope for discussion must be limited
- in times of crisis when decisive action might be needed to limit damage to the business or danger to others
Autocratic management
* Limitations
- demotivates workers who want to contribute and accept responsibility
- decisions do not benefit from employee input
- Workers can become so used to this style that they are dependent on managers
Democratic
* Features
- participation encouraged
- two-way communication is used, which allows feedback from workers
- workers are given information about the business to allow their full involvement
Democratic
* Applications
- most likely to be useful in businesses that expect
workers to contribute fully to the production and decisionmaking processes, thereby satisfying their higher-order needs - an experienced and flexible workforce will be likely to benefit most from this style
- in situations that demand a new way of thinking or a new solution, employee input can be very valuable
Democratic
* Limitations
- consultation with workers can be time-consuming
- on occasions, quick decision-making will be required
- some business issues might be too sensitive to allow worker involvement (e.g. job losses) or too secret (e.g. new product development)
Paternalistic
* Features
- managers do what they think is best for the workers
- some consultation might take place, but the final decisions are taken by the managers – there is no true participation in decision-making
- managers want workers to be happy in their jobs
Paternalistic
* Application
- used by managers who have a genuine concern for workers’ interests, but feel that managers know best in the end
- when workers are young or inexperienced this might be an appropriate style to employ
Paternalistic
* Limitations
- demotivation of more experienced workers who would prefer to be given responsibility for decision-making
Laissez-faire management
* Features
The term ‘laissez-faire’ means ‘let them do it’. Laissez-faire management allows workers to carry out tasks and take decisions themselves within very broad limits. This is an extreme version of democratic management. There is very little input from management into the work to be undertaken by subordinates.
Laissez-faire management
* Limitations
- workers may not appreciate the lack of structure and direction in their work – this could lead to a loss of security
- lack of feedback – as managers do not closely monitor progress – may be demotivating
Laissez-faire management
* Application
- when managers are too busy (or too lazy) to intervene
- may be appropriate in research institutions where experts are more likely to arrive at solutions when not
constrained by narrow rules or management controls