Week 10 Flashcards
Attachment
Coding infants
adult rela.
Impact on later dev.
Connection with mom predicts attachment later,
About romantic rela
Self report questionnaire
Hazen and Shaver (1987)
Scale, which one firsts you best.
Three types romantic rela.
Secure 60% (Jim Pam from office)
Insecure/Anxious/avoidant 25% (Sheldon Amy)
Insecure ambivalent 15% (leoandard penny)
What we know when we know a personl
Level 1: big five traits Level 2: personal concerns Motives ●Personal Projects, Strivings, Goals ●Developmental Issues Attachment style, contextual, unprepared to big five traits. So ask pRents friends how they act, as rela may differ in big five traits than every day life. Level 3: indenting and life narrative Predicts secure optimistic tone of life narrative. Insecure, more trouble tribulations
The grand theory of John bowlby
Mammals are wired to become attached
Strong instinctual toward attachment, to protect young, keeps us alive.
Emotion regulation
Young Overwhelmed if no help from pRents to regulate.
Attachment development
Normative:
Maintaining proximity: reflexes, suckle, grab.
Progression sophistication, no see hear, then show preference for mom dad, reciprocal things then come.
True across cultures, 99% have attachment.
When there is not, result of major developmental problem. Eg autism
Empathize vs systematize
Emp. Relating, focus on systematizing.
Behavioural training for asd. Never goes away fundamentally. Though
Koestner picture of daughter and her best friend.
Demonstrate
Autistic child, you never see that.
Well you do see that with Allan.
Autism, biologically based. Highly genetic 90%. Males outnumber females. rare 4-6 out of 10,000 not sure of gene.
Attachment pictures
Bigger heartier, big head of black hair.
Cruising, stage before walking.
Baby beyond, holding carriage carry. Better attachment in other cultures.
Interaction between pRent and child when memory develops, lead to expectation of interaction.
Internal working model
Trust, secure base
Exploration
Insecure – distrust, anxiety, pessimism.
Seperation and stranger ranger, normal attachment behaviour. When you do not see that. Afraid of strangers, anxious if left. That means something has gone wrong. 12-18th months, can predict quite well. Design stru tried situation cope with strangers united with are ts.
Insecure, distrust,
Assessing infant attachment
●Strange Situation for 12-18 mth old ●reaction to stranger & returning mom ●Secure – 65% ●Insecure ●Avoidant, 20% ok with mom leaving, ●Anxious-Ambivalent ,15% not consoled when mother returns,
Same match adult attachment styles
Developed by Mary aims worth.
Another category,
D babies, for disorganized, unpredictable
Look scarred of moms
Core symptoms of autism
●Deficits in social interaction
●do not initiate or respond to social contact as babies
●do not establish eye contact, odd use of gaze
●Impaired communication
●severe impairment of verbal and nonverbal comm.
●Restricted interests
●focus on small (non-social details of situation)
●stereotyped & repetitive play
●change of routine results in extreme agitation
Where do the differences come from.
Mostly connected to the mother
●Consistent ●Sensitive ●Responsive ●Attentive ●Not Interfering or controlling.
●Key study by Ainsworth 1984:
●At 3 mths: ●Resp. to crying; though at 1yr should not respond right away. ●Affection w holding; ●Enter room; ●Feeding
Predict attachment, at 12 months, through mother interaction
What developmental outcomes are associated with security of attachment
More full Exploration: ex. leading playhouse exploration and more full exploration.
Better Task mastery. Persist puzzle
Emotional adaptation
Social adaption
Works for older ages too.
Describe hansel and shaver
40% parallel kids adults insecure
The most complete study of attachment longitudinal study
Simpson 2007
Observe trajectory. Tricky as it looks different at different ages. 8or 9 not even friends, just being accepted
Diversity of sources of data.
Differ ts stages, 16 23,
Results:
There is a significant correlation, .2 small though. From age 1-23
More to the story,
Stronger related to next developmental atge.
.36 competent eft with peers, friendship at 16, .43 for romantic rela.
So being secure early on sets a precedent, much like identiy closure.
Most strong direct impact closest developmental time period.
Stability is queationnnable,
Stability of Ttachment
Overtime. R =.3, not like ratios, more like motives
Across partners .4 so things can change
Depends on other person, how they feel about you. Ex. Lean odd penny, lot of partners, standards a not met, worries valid, depends on context.
Selecting mates? More likely you will find secure attached person if you are securely attached.
Parenting our own children? R =.3
Intervention, shows some success.