Unit 1 content summary Flashcards
4
Democracy Key Takeaways
- Representative democracy is the UK’s main system, with direct democracy used in referendums.
- The UK’s democracy faces debates on participation, democratic deficit, and potential reforms.
- Suffrage has expanded significantly, from the 1832 Reform Act to the Representation of the People Act 1918.
- Potential reforms include votes at 16, digital democracy, compulsory voting, and prisoner voting.
4
Main Content
Different Types of Democracy
- Democracy: Rule by the people.
- Representative Democracy: People elect representatives (MPs) to act on their behalf.
Representatives exercise their own judgment, are held accountable through elections.
Direct Democracy: Individuals express opinions and vote on laws directly.
- Associated with ancient Athens, used today in referendums.
Example: Brexit referendum, Scottish independence referendum.
Example: 2015 Recall of MPs Act.
Switzerland uses direct democracy extensively.
Potential Reforms: Greater use of direct democracy (referendums). - Recent referendums (Brexit) have conflicted with parliamentary sovereignty.
4
Pluralist Democracy
- Government decisions result from interplay of ideas and arguments from competing groups.
- Encourages diverse voices and lessens the chance of minority neglect.
- Key points include pressure groups and responsiveness of representatives.
- Questions: To what extent does the UK have a pluralist democracy?
Legitimacy
Legal right to exercise power (e.g., government’s right to rule after an election).
Derived from the support of the people.
4
Similarities Between Direct and Representative Democracy
- Both designed to implement the will of the people.
- Based on majority rule; voting plays an important role.
- Implemented at local, regional, and national levels.
Example: Referendums. - People can be swayed by powerful individuals (politicians, media).
Direct democracy elements (petitions, pressure groups) are important in representative democracy.
Perspectives on Democracy
- Protective Perspective: Protects individual freedom; doesn’t require mass participation.
Sufficient participation to grant legitimacy.
(Assumption): UK democracy is healthy if it has a decent amount of political participation.
Example: Elections with 60% turnout are not necessarily a problem. - Developmental Perspective: Successful democracy needs active citizen engagement.
Greater engagement leads to a more open and equal society.
(Assumption): Low turnout and lack of political interest are problems.
2
Differences Between Direct and Representative Democracy
- Direct democracy: Individuals express opinions themselves.
Requires more citizen engagement.
No political parties, but campaigns on each side.
Accountability is less structured.
Acts through the rule of the majority (tyranny of the majority). - Representative democracy: Citizens elect representatives.
Political parties exist.
Government is elected and held accountable.
More protections for minorities.
Handles complex decisions better.
2
Advantages and Disadvantages of Direct Democracy
- Advantages:
Equal weight to all votes.
Encourages participation.
Removes the need for trusted representatives.
Minimizes corruption.
Develops a sense of community. - Disadvantages:
Impractical in large, populated states.
Many people may not feel qualified to make decisions.
Open to manipulation by speakers.
Can disregard minority viewpoints (tyranny of the majority).
2
Advantages and Disadvantages of Representative Democracy
- Advantages:
Practical system for large countries.
Parties give people a choice of representatives.
Reduces the chance of tyranny of the majority.
Elections hold representatives accountable.
Politicians are better informed. - Disadvantages:
May lead to reduced participation.
Parties/politicians may not represent the best interests of the people.
Minorities can be underrepresented.
Politicians avoid accountability.
Politicians prioritize their interests.
Representatives often elected with less than 50% of the vote.
5
Assessments of the UK’s Democracy
Participation Crisis:
Arguments for
- Low voter turnout (hovering around 68%).
- Low turnout in second-order elections and referendums.
- Political apathy.
- Low party membership (1.6% of the electorate).
- Negative perceptions of MPs.
5
Assessments of the UK’s Democracy
Participation Crisis:
Arguments against
- Significant turnouts in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum (84.6%) and the 2016 Brexit referendum (72.7%).
- Increase in turnout since 2001.
- Apathy suggests people are content.
Surge in Labour party membership (2015).
Significant party membership for smaller parties (SNP, UKIP). - Increased pressure group membership.
- Direct action and social media participation.
Positive Democratic Features:
- Devolved governments (Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland).
Elected mayors. - Direct democracy (referendums).
Independent judiciary. - Free media.
- Free, fair, and regular elections.
- Wide range of parties and pressure groups.
Arguments for democratic deficit:
- First-past-the-post system (unrepresentative results).
- Unelected House of Lords.
- Lack of protection for citizens’ rights (Human Rights Act).
- Control of the media by wealthy interests.
- MPs prioritizing careers.
3
Who Can Vote Today:
- Adults over 18, registered to vote.
- British, Irish, and Commonwealth citizens.
UK nationals living abroad for less than 15 years. - Cannot Vote: Under 18, EU citizens (except Irish), House of Lords members, prisoners, those with corrupt electoral practices, and those detained in psychiatric hospitals.
2
Key Events in Widening the Franchise:
- Before 1832: Varied voting rights, mainly for the wealthy.
Problems: Unequal distribution of seats, plural voting, exclusion of women.
In the early 19th century, the electorate totaled 400,000 (all men) out of a population of 10 million. - 1832 Great Reform Act:
Abolished underpopulated boroughs.
Created seats for urban boroughs (e.g., Manchester).
Extended the vote to more people in counties.
Standardized qualifications for boroughs.
Increased the vote to an estimated 650,000 (5% of the adult population).
4
Key Events in Widening the Franchise II
- Chartists:
Demanded the franchise for all men over 21, secret ballot, payment of MPs, and annual elections. - Suffragists and Suffragettes:
Suffragists (Millicent Fawcett) used non-violent methods.
Suffragettes (Emmeline Pankhurst) used militant tactics. - Key protest: Emily Davidson’s death at the Epsom Derby (1913).
Attitudes: Hostility, but also sympathy.
Imprisoned suffragettes used hunger strikes. - 1918 Representation of the People Act:
Granted all men over 21 and women over 30 (householders or wives of householders) the vote.
75% of the adult population could now vote.
Passed due to pressure and the role of women in WWI.
3
Potential Further Reforms to Suffrage
Votes at 16:
Scotland (2014): 16 and 17-year-olds voted in the independence referendum.
- Arguments for:
Have other legal rights.
Would increase political participation.
Social media has increased political awareness.
Increased engagement in Scottish elections.
Give them a say on issues (e.g., tuition fees). - Arguments against:
Lack necessary life experience and maturity.
May misuse the right to vote.
More likely to be taken in by fake news.
Limited legal rights in practice.
Low turnout among 16-24 year olds.
Little evidence of desire for the vote.
2
E-Voting and Digital Democracy
- E-democracy and digital democracy impact democracy through social media and the internet.
- Allows organizations with modest resources to campaign and spread views.
E-petitions (10,000 signatures = government response, 100,000 signatures = debate in Parliament).
Examples: Revoke Article 50, ban ISIS members.
Websites like 38 degrees also have e-petitions.
2
E-Voting and Digital Democracy arguments
- Arguments for:
Increased participation.
Informed electorate.
Direct communication between government and citizens.
Enhances pluralism. - Arguments against:
Greater access to extremist groups.
Disinformation.
Government influenced by short-term campaigns.
2
Prisoner Voting arguments
- Arguments for:
Voting is a fundamental right.
European Court of Human Rights ruling (2005).
Losing the vote is unlikely to deter crime.
Removes civic responsibility and damages rehabilitation. - Arguments against:
Criminals forfeit the right to a say.
Would have a significant impact on constituencies.
2
Compulsory Voting arguments
- Arguments for:
Voting is a social duty.
Encourages people to engage.
Makes polls more representative. - Arguments against:
May lead to donkey voting.
Undemocratic to force people.
Doesn’t address deeper reasons for not voting.
2
Key Pressure Group Takeaways
- Types of Pressure Groups: Career, industry, social movements, and internal and external groups.
- Success Factors: Resources, Strategy, Leadership, Public Support, and Government Attitudes.
Other impacts: How think tanks, lobbyists, and corporations influence government.
Introducing the Pressure Group
- Definition: A group that seeks to influence politics to achieve a specific goal, unlike political parties, they do not seek political office, but rather change policy by influencing public opinion, parliament, and government.
- Reasons to join: Members may strongly support a particular political cause or benefit from benefits such as legal representation and job security.
3
Types of pressure groups
- Cause-based groups: Focused on achieving a specific goal or drawing attention to a particular issue, membership is usually open to anyone sympathetic to the cause.
- Sectoral groups: Promote the interests of specific groups in society, such as trade unions, whose membership is usually limited to those with certain qualifications or expertise.
- Social Movements: Similar to cause-based groups, but loosely structured, often seeking to achieve a single goal, and thriving thanks to the advent of social media.