The Constitution II - unit 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Arguments AGAINST a British Bill of Rights

A

The Bill would impact the application of positive obligations, which require public bodies to take action to protect rights. Some of these obligations include conducting effective investigations into the loss of life (as in the Hillsborough inquests) or into serial sexual offenders (as in the John Worboys case)

Ignores international laws, takes away HRA duty to read legislation - compatable - harder to seek human rights without stratsbourg court or higher power interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Arguments FOR a British Bill of Rights

A

The Bill will ensure courts cannot interpret laws in ways that were never intended by Parliament and will empower people to express their views freely. At the same time, it will help prevent trivial human rights claims from wasting judges’ time and taxpayer money

No need for European judgement, take our power back, endangers devolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Constitutional reform since 1997 aims (4)

A
  • The modernisation of political institutions - the Houses, the civil service and the local gov
  • Greater democratisation - directed at increased participation in insitutions and the decision making process, Acceptance of referendums and other forms of direct democracy are principal initaives
  • Decentralisation of power from Westminister and Whitehall, greater powers for local gov ro introduction of regional gov in england
  • Improving and safeguarding individual and minority rights - the flagship being the HRA which came into force Oct 2001
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reasons for reform - The Lords

A
  • Remove hereditary peers - all appointed chamber of life peers and church of england bishops and 92/753 hereditary peers retained seats such as Cranborne Compromise
  • Replace with an elected chamber - lack of political consensus

(part of decentralisation, less power in one chamber)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reasons for reform - The HOC

A
  • Concerned the departmental select committees - 2010 introduced a system for electing members by the whole HOC chamber instead of party leader election so MPs can elect in proportion without whips
  • Backbench Business Committee - MPs got control of 20 parliamentary days to debate issues of choice - higher influence and control
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reasons for reform - Human Rights Act 1998

A
  • Allows citizens to challenge gov and understand rights
  • Binding on all public bodies
  • Incorporated the ECHR in UK law - courts must enforce
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Reasons for reform - Freedom of Information Act 2000

A

Gave gov right to conceal info if it felt it might prejudice activities of gov

Weak - Human right campaigners said - 2008 request to information tribunal to release details of expenses claimed by MPs - Parl attempted to block through High Court, failed - released to Daily Telegraph - MPs accused ‘milking’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Reasons for reform - electoral reform

A

1997, Labour worried they wouldn’t gain enough seats for outright majority - might need coalition with the Lib Dems and this was their top priorities - Lab put this in their manifesto

Introduced Jenkins Commission - reported s preference for an AV electoral system, contributed to New Labour benefitting from old FPTP elections

Forms of prop rep used - reflect party and around 1-2 parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Reasons for reform - reintroduction of London government

A
  • Created a Devolved London Assembly
  • Election of a mayor with executive power and assembly - allocation of funds, distributes and administers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reasons for reform - Reform of the judiciary

A

Constitutional Reform Act 2005

  • Separation of judiciary and government - Lord Chancellor no longer in all 3 branches of gov as a Cabinet Minister, head of judiciary and precided over HOL proceedings - was removed - role combined with Justice secretary
  • SC - senior judges taken out of lords - not appropriate or members to be members of a high level in the judiciary
  • Appointment of senior judges - danger that Chanc and PM appoint on the basis of political views instead of legal qualifications - gov now has final say after approval of Judicial Appointments Commission
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Effects of Constitutional change - The Lords

A
  • More difficult than Labour Party expected and proved problematic for the Coalition too. Initially managed to persuade the Lords to accept limited reform - 1992 - 2 hereditary peers - less than an eighth of the total were to remain on a temporary basis - since then any furhter reform has not got pass the discussion phase
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Effects of Constitutional change - The HOC

A

New Lab pledged to reform HOC to modernise it

Select Committee system bolstered - elected members

Common Liasion Committee scrutinises PM directly

BackBench Business Committee est 2010 given backbench MPs 20 parliamentary days to debate issues of their choosing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Effects of Constitutional change - HRA 1998

A

Binds Welsh, Scot and NI political system

UK gov ministers and their departments and organisations involved in public business such as the media, schools, colleges and charities

Any action by these bodies can be scrutinised in a court o law and may be declared unlawful - result into compensation or action being cancelled

Main exception of this law is parliamentary legislation - ECHR still hears appeals against UK legislation, judgements are not binding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Effects of Constitutional change - Electoral reform

A

Labour won, but became less interested
Presence of Lib Dems and Coalition government forced vote on AV in May 2011 - Reform could have reduced the liklihood of the winner’s bonus under FPTP and the electoral dictatorship

As of 2022, smaller parties still calling for introduction of PR but Labour are resisting this pressure whilst the Con are outright against it, removing SV from Mayoral elections and replacing it with SV in 2022

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Effects of Constitutional change - Freedom of Information Act 2000

A

Disappointment to civil right campaigners

  • Citizens can see information that is held about them by public bodies - this has been relativley uncontroversial
  • Right to see the workings of government - if it had worked freedom of info would have ended the British culture of secrecy in gov,
    however leg in 2000 was a much watered version of similar measures in operation elsewhere in Europe - security services were exempt and the rest of the gov was given a rather important concession,
    the right to conceal info if it felt it might prejudice the activities of gov Civil Rights groups see the new Act as virtually useless
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Effects of Constitutional change - London government

A

Not originally intended to provide an alternative power base for high profile national politicians

Congestion Charges and Winning the Olympics in 2012 - two profile and power raising things

London Mayor also emerged as a major national political figure and one that can question the gov effectively - Johnson championing the cause of a Thomas airport, ‘Boris Island’ despite the gov green agenda

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Effects of Constitutional change - Judicial reform

A
  • Independent SC established Oct 2009
  • Separation of Home Office into Home Office and Ministry for Justice
  • There is evidence of the Judiciary becoming more willing to publicly criticise the decisions of gov
17
Q

Reforms under the coalition 2010-2015 - elected police commissioners 2011

A

To act as a public representative for the police, overseeing budgets and police procedures - hoped to increase accountability over policing in local areas

Worst - Anne Force - didn’t know her job description, spent 15K on a tour bus for herself, didn’t know certain crimes

Turnout terrible - 15% - Wales, average 10-20% in England, lowest turnout since ww2

18
Q

Reforms under the coalition 2010-2015 - Fixed Term Parliaments Act

A

Helped ease the fear that the coalition gov in 2010 would be unstable and wouldn’t last long - this act allowed a disagreement between 2 parties without the danger o the government falling apart - before, if there was a conflict, easy for Parl to defeat a divided gov and call for a ge

Worked for the duration of the coalition - limits exposed in Apri 2017 when May announced a snap election 8th June avoiding restrictions by introducing such a motion and a 2/3 maj in the Commons

19
Q

Reforms under the coalition 2010-2015 - Recall of MPs in 2015

A

Constituencies can recall an MP involved in misbehaviour
Requires a petition supported by at least 10% of the MP constituencies
If MP imprisoned or suspended by HOC - subjected to a by-election - likely to lose their seat

2019 - 2 MPs lost their seats as direct results of recall elections - Fiona in Petersborough for a less than a year custodial sentence and Chris in Brecon and Radnorshire for a submitting a false or misleading expenses claim

20
Q

Reforms under the coalition 2010-2015 - House of Lords Reform Acts 2014 and 15

A

Allowed lords to remove a peer if they breached a code of conduct
Allowed members of the HOL to retire or resign or to be removed from prolonged non attendance or expelled for serious conviction

Spring 2020 - 105 peers used the act to resign/retire - 6 expelled for non attendence

21
Q

Reforms under the coalition 2010-2015 - City devolution

A

Combined authorities introduced across England - metro areas where previously independent local councils within a metropolitan area combine resources and share services across a wide area to make them more effective, cut cost, econ intensive

Cities and Local Gov Act 2016 - tackling longstanding issues of underperformance in housing, business, and transport issues

22
Q

Reforms under the coalition 2010-2015 - elected metro mayors

A

Parl granted permission of the 12 largest cities in England to hold referendums on whether to have a mayor or not

2015 - Osborne announced combined authorities keep all revenue rather than give to central exchequer (if they agree to a directly elected mayor)

2017 - 6 metro mayors

23
Q

Metro mayors - West Midlands

A
  • Andy street - metro mayor
  • 30 year investment fund - 1.1B
  • Industrial strategy - Trailblazer

6M housing delivery team
Consolidated transport budget
bus franchising, 250M transforming cities fund

24
Q

Devolution

A

The process of delegating power, but not sov from the UK Parl to specific regions of the country. This power can be returned to Parl through a constitutional statute

Free to make laws and create policy on a range of measures - health, education, infrastructure that are enabled by Westminister on a grassroot level

Parl does not allow them to set taxes nationally and war defence

25
Q

Original reasons for introducing more devolved powers

A
  • Greater rep in the UK - 1970s - Lab gov considered under influence of SNP (11 MPs in Westminister) and small maj - reduced on Liberal and SNP support to avoid losing VONC
  • Believed it would enhance democracy, and bring gov close to ppl - response to early nationalist Scotland settlement
    Peace settlement with NI and Republican - cemented with a devolution settlement
26
Q

Differences between Federalism and Devolution - Federalism

A

Legal sov divided between central gov and regional gov
Entrenched in codified constitution
Powers granted to different regionl gov and are equal and symmetrical
Any powers not specified in constitution ate usually granted to regional gov

27
Q

Devolution - Scotland

A

129 elected members
devolution in 1999 - responsible for many areas, powers extended have ‘devo-max’ - maximum devolved powers before independence - this was pledged by Con, Lab and Lib Dems

Scotland Act 2016
- Widened areas as to where Scot could pass laws
- Power over regulation of energy industry transferred to Scotland
- Control over a range of welfare services including housing and disability

28
Q

Devolution - Wales

A

1997 ref showed only a narrow mja - 50.5-49.5% ctually wanted a devolved assembly and turnout was only 50% - only 35% of Welsh electorate voted for it - unsuprising Wales got given less powers than Scotland

Senedd Cymru Welsh Parliament, meets in Cardiff Bay, 60 elected members and law making powers over a range of areas

Government of Wales Act 2017 - more autonomy in gov competency

  • Removal of the provisions of the 2014 Wales Act to require devolution of taxation to be decided by a referendum
  • Confirmation of fiscal measures passed to Welsh Assembly - including the ability to vary income tax by 10p in the pound
29
Q

Devolution - NI

A

The Troubles - a violent 30 year conflict that began with a civil rights march in londonderry 5th Oct 1968

NI created - part of the UK, the rest independent - caused a split between unionists (protestants that wanted to stay in the uk) and nationalists (catholic, wanted to join in the new irish state)

Good Friday Agreement 10th April 1998 - set up a gov to represent both sides, people in born in NI can have uk or irish nationality

3 main areas politicians agreed:
- Armed groups dispose of weapons
- People involved in violence released to prison
- UK gov agreed to aim for ‘security arrangements’ such as scaling back UK military presence

30
Q

Policy differences - Scotland

A
  • Dominant party in SNP
  • Personal care for elderly is free
  • Prescriptions are free
  • No university tuition fees for Scottish students
  • Greater restrictions on fox hunting
31
Q

Policy differences - Wales

A
  • No school league tables are published
  • Free prescriptions for everyone under 25
  • Greater help provided for homeless
  • University tuition fees capped at 6000 a year
32
Q

Policy differences - NI

A
  • Republicans and Loyalists have to cooperate in gov under permanent power sharing
  • Gay marriage not recognised till 2020
  • Greater restrictions on abortion
  • Prescriptions free (likely to change)
33
Q

The West Lothian Question

A

Scottish and Welsh MPs able to vote on matters that did not affect their own constituents

Only as a result of Scottish MPs voting to increase student tuition fees to 3000 per year in 2002 that the measure passed despite the fact that it would not affect Scottish students

34
Q

English votes for English laws 2015

A

An additional stage for passing legislation
If the Speaker determines the bill only concerned England or only England or Wales, bill could be voteod by a vote representing MPs from those regions

Did not ensure that measures desired by a maj of Engand, or English and Welsh would be passed, in extension of Sunday trading in 2016 - passed EVEL stage, defeated by a vote for the chamber - SNP MPs against it

35
Q

Further devolution in England WOULD improve democracy and governance in the UK

A
  • Would solve the West Lothian Question (EVEL doesn’t go far enough) - define the q, EVEL scrapped 13th July 2021 - gov claiming this would remove unecessary complications
  • Would equalise representation across the UK - additional member system for Scotland and Wales, single transferable vote in NI - without it - scot and wales down by lab, unionists controlled ni
  • Would address the rise of English nationalism - unecessary, but yeah (should work on this)
  • It has worked where it has been introduced in England - metro mayor in West Midlands
36
Q

Further devolution in England WOULD NOT improve democracy and governance in the UK

A
  • West Lothian Question is not a major problem - welfare issues have devolved so this should be questioned, hasn’t looked into when you would draw the line
  • England is too large to allow for national devolution - 84% of UK pop and 95% of UK’s GDP, England would still dominate Parl, meaning could more effectively control both the UK Parl and own English Parl. Different from federal systems like Texas, or Cali in USA, can’t dominate without co op from other states
  • Would undermine Westminister Parliament - parl sov - further devolution would challenge the authority of England. Scottish Parl have a lot of power already - any more and they want independence
  • Many places in England have rejected it - suc as north east authority stopped a regional devolution deal for the area, sudentland, durham, south tynsede and gathead all voting against taking the proposals due to public consolidation
37
Q

Devolution HAS been beneficial to the UK

A
  • Has not led to the breakup of the UK - metro mayors and policing
  • NI devolution has helped to maintain the peace and enhanced democracy in all countries through PR - The Troubles and the Good Friday agreement
  • In all 3 devolved nations, has led to serious policy differences from the Westminister parliament in ways which benefit the nations - Wales 2011 Gov Act - gained power to make and pass primary legislation in 20 key areas and does not need Westminister approval
  • There remains widespread support for continued devolution in Scot, Wales and NI - devo max, scot leg 2017
38
Q

Devolution HAS NOT been beneficial to the UK

A
  • Scot nationalism has not declined since 2014 - scot independence ref 2014 - yes - 45%, no 55%
  • Introduction of proportional representation electoral systems has inhibited strong and decisive governance, particularily in ni - sv
  • These policy differences created serious disagreements with Westminister gov - Brexit uk - 52% leave, scot - 62%, staggering maj
  • Turnout in elections for the devolved regions is quite low - wales with 50%, 2016 elections - scot parl - 55.6%, ni assembly - 54.2% barely get 1/2
39
Q

Differences between Federalism and Devolution - Devolution

A

Power, but not sov delegated
Not entrenched, not flexible
Powers may be delegated in unequal amounts to different regional gov
Any powers not specified in devolution legislation are reserved to central gov