Parliament (1) - unit 2 Flashcards
What is a ‘fusion’ of power?
When the executive branch and legislature branches intermingle
- Legislature - an assembly with the authority to make laws for a political entry
- Executive branch - responsible for the implementation of laws and policies adopted by the legislature
stops electoral dictatorship
How to calculate a majority?
- Winning party - Opposition = Majority
Functions of Parliament
- Making government accountable to maintaining it in power
- Coalition government - 2 parties merge, compromise
- Confidence and Supply agreement - occasionally counting on another party’s vote
Sovereignty
A power that cannot be overruled
The authority of a state to govern itself or another state
Parliamentary sovereignty
- A principle of the UK Constitution
- Supreme legal authority of a state to govern itself or another state
- Courts cannot overrule legislation
- No Parliament can pass laws that future Parliaments can change
Difference between legal and political sovereignty?
- Legal - THEORETICAL right to excercise laws
- Political - power is PRACTICED - more in the face of public opinion
A prominent lord
- Robert Winston
- Developed IVF - allowed symptoms to be diagnosed
- Labour
- Communicated science
Parliament;s reserve powers
- Veto/block (Vote down) legislature - Done by the HOL - proves that leg is over - ‘held in reserve’
- Vote of no confidence - can dismiss a government in lost confidence - sovereignty elects a confident representative
General facts - 650 MPs, each MP (usually in a party) represents constituencies, most MPs are back-benchers, proceedings led by a Speaker elected by MPs, all parties have whips
Legislative powers of the House of Lords
- They don’t legitimise legislation - ‘no consent’ - the bill must be passed through to be scrutinised for the Commons so it is amended and improved
- Can delay legislation for a year - Commons can vote to bypass laws from the Lords without approval - EG War Powers Act 1991 - they are ‘ping-ponged’ till there is an agreement
Scrutiny of secondary legislature - Lords
Any lawmaking or change made to law made by any member of government without the necessary parliamentary procedures
Scrutiny of government - Lords
Limited - all senior ministers, especially cabinet ministers sit in the HOC
- Lords have knowledge in the field
- Commitee stage - debates the details of proposed legislature and table and propose amendments
- More legislature, more clauses, removes ineffecient sections
Representation - Lords
- No single party has a majority
- Don’t need to focus on being re-elected - power of whips weaker, no electoral pressure
- Larger range of political opinions
National debate - Lords
- Debates on important national issues - specialise in moral and ethicality
such as - assisted suicide
- pornography
- refugees
- stem cell research
Role of the monarchy
- Appointing a government - by convention appointing the individual most likely of commanding the majority
- Opening and dismissing Parliament - may dissolve it
- The King’s Speech - reads out in the Lord’s chamber and is the state opening of Parliament
- Royal assent - 1st step for a royal parlimentary with the bill to become law - they can delay through reserve powers
Parlimentary ping pong
- When the bill is sent back and forth between the HOC and the HOL as they try to resolve disagreements over a text
Influence of the HOL
- Three main functions - making law, investigating public policy (justice, home affairs, sustainability of the NHS, holding the gov to account
- They have a one year delay
- Considering draft government bills before they become law , ‘a revising chamber’ - they produce reports which can often directly or indirectly influence the formulation of government policy (cannot pass, and rarely overrule)
- Lords Secondary legislation committee - examines statutory instruments and delegated legislation - laws passed by ministers with little commons scrutiny
Evidence of HOL influence
- 128 government defeats in the HOL in 2021-22 when Johnson suffered no HOC defeats
- Bills with the most gov defeats between 1999 and 2023 - Environment Bill, Crime Sentencing and Courts Bill, Health and Care Bill
- Concerns over the civil liberties during the passage of the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill. Many appears opposed the high range of controversial provisions - criminalising certain protest tactics and expanding stop and search powers - gov accepted lord amendments removing restrictions on the noise level of protest
- Only 41% of Lord defeats were completely overturned in the Commons - 59% of cases had the Lord’s input in the final outcome
Lords lack of power
- Lack of power to compel change - the Public Order Bill 2023 - Suffered a number of setbacks, and a tense showdown, the lords amendment would’ve meant serious disruption stricter definition preventing groups like just stop oil
commons won
minor changes rejected by conserv dom commons
Bicameralism and the Salisbury Convention
- You have 2 chambers in Parliament
- Because HOL are unelected, cannot obstruct anything in the gov’s manifesto bc of gov’s democratic mandate
Parliamentary Acts of 1911 and 1949
They have no control over financial business and they can only refute to pass a piece of legislature once - they can be bypassed if commons releases it the following year
Controversial appointments for the HOL
Zac Goldsmith - accused of racial profiling voters in the London mayoral campaign
Jo Johnson - accused of having links to the manipulation of share prices of companies controlled by billionaire Galtam Adari via overseas investment payments
27 members of the HOL donated a total of £50M to the Conservative Party, including Sir Peter Cruddas who donated £3M - he was a Conservative party treasurer and his appointment was not approved by the HOL appointments commission, Johnson appointed anyway
HOL reform - Fully appointed support
- Helps maintain the current broad range of membership of the HOL rather than creating more professional politicians - Lord Sugar or Baroness Grey-Thompson stand for election
- Doesn’t threaten the democratic supremacy of the HOC but could act as a counterbalance to an overly dominant executive
- Appointment is more cost effective than election
- Without fear of deselection at re-election, members can be more independent minded
HOL reform - Fully elected support
- Addresses current democratic deficit, giving HOL a full mandate to amend and initiate legislation
- Counterbalance to an overly dominant executive - proportional rep makes votes cast and seats won fairer
- More people and parties given the opportunity to stand for Parliament - greater range of rep, especially under PR, smaller parties benefit from
- More young people in the HOL - only 29 peers under 50, sit in the lords the rest of our lives - female rep recently 24% - London and South East massively over represented
HOL reform - Hybrid support
- Combines the fully appointed and fully elected systems - addresses the democratic deficit while retaining individuals with expertise and experience
- HOC retain democratic supremacy as it would be more democratically legitimate
- Straightforward system to introduce
HOL reform - Abolition support
- New Zeal and Denmark and other countries function without a second chamber, so can we
- Save money with one
- Scrutiny can be carried out in different ways through strengthened committee system - eg select committee, liason, public accounts