Relations between the branches II - unit 2 Flashcards
Independence…
Factors that allow SC to influence the Executive and the Legislature
- Independence of the court guaranteed by law
- Can set aside executive actions which set aside ECHR or rule or law
- Can intepret law and thus affect the way in which it is implemented
- Declarations of incompatablity can be overturned, but are powerful and often headed by gov
- Uk left EU, no higher court (european court of justice) above the SC - its the highest court
No power…
Limitations on SC influence
- No power to enforce rulings, relies on executive and legislature to do so
- Powers of SC granted by statute law, and therefore could be weakened or overturned by parl through weakening judicial review
- UK left EU, higher chance of HRA repeal, gov seeks to entrench position as most powerful branch and remove any vestiges of foreign law, even if ECHR is not part of the eu
Judicial review…
Rights are fully protected
- UK has developed its protection of civil rights by extending ways to redress grievances - alongside ability to contact MP, citizens can go to the courts who will uphold HRA 1998 - declarations of incompatability - 27, 19 confirmed since 3 from 2015-17
- Growing use of judicial review and use of ultra vires to criticise action of gov or public body - justice for health - pressure group 2016 acting on behalf of uk junior doctors started a 2 day hearing at high court in london arguing jeremy hunt acted ultra vires in trying to impose a new employment contract on junior doctors that affects pay and conditions for weekend working in particular
- Use of Judicial Review to highlight public concerns - Miller Case 2016 - Miller v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU and triggering Article 50
Human rights act…
Rights are in Danger
- HRA under threat from Con - Amnesty international criticised plans from Justice Secretary Dominic Raab to replace Lab HRA with British Bill of rights - wants to slash power of ordinary to challenge gov while Raab says it protects press better from exposing wrongdoing as feared free speech being whittled away
- Use of judicial review controversial and gov seeking to weaken it - coalition restricted cases that could apply for legal aid and rose money needed for court cases
- Gov can, through Parl, rewrite leg to amend the law - Brown and Terrorists assets case - SC ruled 2010 gov did not have power to freeze assets of terror suspects without consulting parl first - brown outraged, parl passed terrorist assets freezing act 2010 - will of parl prevailed and sc could do nothing
Lord Chief Justice…
Senior judging becoming ‘voices of concern’
- Where eminated judges such as Lord Chief Justice use their elevated status within society to raise concern about a particular issue
EG Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales criticised the gov for wanting to hold ‘secret trials’ under the 2013 Justice and Security Act 2013
Lord Woolf condemned David Blunkett (Lab home sec) for prison overcrowding
Civil liberties…
A growth of authoritarianism in the UK
Conflict has grown in recent years between senior judges and executive - willingess of ministers to criticise the judiciary
Gov expanding own powers at expense of civil liberties
EG 2015 then Home Sec May announed a new Investigatory Powers Act of 2016 - grealty expanded electronic surveillance powers of British intelligence agencies. Civil liberties pressure group Liberty made getting rid of this act one of their key campaigns and sued gov for repeal - 2019 high court ruled against them saying ‘bulk powers’ of the act dont breach privacy and free expression rights and justified on the basis of security and safety
PM…
How does the Executive control Parliament
- Gov maj - Blair 178 1997, 2.5K
- Patronage of PM - control of all appointments and dismissals, power over MPs
- MP self preservation - dislike of elections - Sunak not calling one in May, Nov instead
- Control of Party whips - control how they organise timetables, offices and other admin tasks, MPs can be suspended - supportive noise - blair
Strong…
Circumstances favouring executive power
- Gov enjoys large maj - blair, defeated only x3
- Gov united around dom ideology and cabinet us united - new labour 1997-2005, thatcherism 1983-90
- Opposition weak and fragmented - 1983-92 - Lab split on left right ideas and 2015-20 - Corbyn leadership split Lab party
Weak…
Circumstances favouring parliament power
- Gov has no maj or small - May c&s agreement with dup minoruty gov, 1992 with 21 seat maj con, 2010 2 party coalition
- Gov party split on issues - 2017-19 - split over nature of Brexit and ref and 1992-97 - major con split over europe
- Leader of governing party lost popularity - 2022 truss, 1989-90 thatcher
National….
The PM disciplinary advantages
- Patronage - before 2019, hunt most loyal con and never voted against tory whip
- Party whips - control backbench mp
- National platform - pm head of executive and therefore has a national media profile and can speak directly to nation - put popular pressure on MPs gaining suport for their position and against parl
Removal…
Constitutional changes that have given parliament more control
- Removal of most hereditary peers - lords more willing to defy and exert control
- Creation of Backbench Business Committee - allowed ordinary MPs to control Parl time away from gov control - debates and private members bills
- Election of Select Committee chairs and MPs - reduced ability of whips to influence salary and standard of MP
STILL…
Parliament is under Executive control
- Gov still relies on ‘payroll vote’ where all ministers, numbering over 100, bound by collective responsibility
- Gov still controls legislative programme and public bill committees that propose amendments
- Gov still have higher adv in resources - national platform
Scrutiny…
Parliament has control away from Executive
- Parl is achieving considerate influence over foreign and military policy, even voting against military interventions
- Select C increasingly influential and have come more under backbench control
- HOL more proactive and obstructive
Can save…
Arguments to leave
- Can save 350M a week - can spend money on priorities like NHS, schools, and housing
- Can be in charge of our own borders - not be overruled by EU judges on tax etc and laws more democratic
- Control immigration - fairer system based on skills, not passport - 2M ppl came over last 10 years
- Can trade with whole world - EU stops us from signing deals with allies australia and nz and growing econ like india, and brazil - secure new opportunities and new jobs
KEY campaigners - Dominic Cummings - campaign director
Business…
Arguments to remain
- Jobs - around 2.5M ppl are employed in uk directly result of EU trade and 1M indirectly - 1/10 employed people - south bank uni
Remain group estimated unemployed up 820K - if we lost 1% of those jobs as a result of leaving - 30K out of work - Trade and business - our membership of EU means business in every country - market of 500M people in 28 countries - accounts for 50% UK exports
- Rights - = pay for men and women enshrined in law, maternity leave, bans on discrimination against age, race or sexual orientation
KEY campaigners - Stuart Rose - chairman, Will Straw - executive director