Tom Questions - Case Study Flashcards

1
Q

What is covered by RIBA stage 4 to 6?

A

RIBA stage 4 is a technical design, which is where the tender pack or employer requirements are finalised, and the project is procured through the chosen route. Additionally, statutory consent will typically be obtained at this point if they were during stage 3.

Stage 5 - is construction/ manufacture; this covers the time the project is on-site.

Stage 6 is the handover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the purpose of the RIBA workstages and how do these assist surveyors?

A

The RIBA plan of works helps to break down and organise the construction process.

In this project, I used it as a checklist during the project and to define the limitations of the project’s scope of services, to which our fee draw could also be linked.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did the client’s construction budget include?

A

The budget included for the main works to the property, external landscaping and a construction contingency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why is it important to understand what is included/excluded from the client’s budget?

A

To avoid scope creep, allow a design to be tailored to the budget, ensuring the budget is spent on the project’s key elements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did you consider when formulating a fee proposal for your services?

A

The project fee proposal was based on the framework percentage rates that were agreed upon with the client—however, specific exclusions such as applying for listed building consent.

For the additional services, such as the roof survey the anticipated time to complete the work, specialist equipment such as the drone, an allowance for expenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did you exclude from your fee proposal?

A

Our project bid excluded the outbuilding, obtaining listed building and planning consent, it also excluded additional design work as the intention was to procure the existing design.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why is it important to identify the exclusions within a fee proposal?

A

Exclusions limit the scope of the project and the surveyor’s liability. They also set client expectations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What do you understand from the term ‘value engineering’? Is it just cost saving?

A

Value engineering should be the process of achieving better value for money on a project without compromising the project outcome. In terms of the case study project, an element that I identified for cutting out in the VE exercise was the Accoya orangery; the high cost of this element would not add a proportionate amount of value to the project in comparison to opening this area up as a patio.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What method did you follow for obtaining competitive tenders?

A

The project was procured through a traditional tender to the two framework contractors and we under took a pre-tender estimate

The returns were judged on 60% price 40% Quality

As far as possible, we asked negotiated with the contractors to fix the provisional sums included in their tenders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What went into the tender documents?

A

ITT
The pricing document
existing and proposed drawings
The specification document
The ASHP heating system design pack
Pre-construction information, including the surveys carried out to date

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were the rental rates identified by the estate agent?

A

The estate agent believed that the property could reach a rental value of £5,000 a month.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How did you inform the estate agent of the proposed market expectation for the standard of accommodation?

A

I gave the estate agent the project brief and details of the property such as location and size.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the expected payback period based on the investment? How was this calculated?

A

The payback period was calculated by dividing the project funding envelope by the yearly rental income, which gave a payback period of around 16 years.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why was the contractor entitled to loss and expense due to programme prolongation?

A

The contractor would be entitled to loss and expense to cover the cost of their additional preliminary costs such as the extended period of hire for welfare units where a relevant matter caused the delay.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the format for the design workshops? Who attended, how were they recorded, what did they cover?

A

Design Workshops were held both in person and via teams. They were chaired by myself and attended by the client team during stage 4 to agree on material specifications and designs. I recorded minutes from the meetings confirming the choices made by the client. We had a separate meeting for different elements of the work, such as hard landscaping works.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did you go about commissioning external consultants’ flood risk and ecology reports?

A

For the ecology report I suggested that we approach the consultant who had previously produced the PRA survey for the property a number of years ago as they may be able to offer a reduced cost for the updated report.

I recommended the provider of the flood risk assessment as someone who had previously provided me with a good level of service, and had previously been the most cost-efficient of three quotes obtained.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Were the external consultants appointed by you?

A

No, the external consultants were appointed directly by the client. However, I facilitated their appointment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did you need to consider when obtaining proposals from other consultants?

A

How they will be appointed, as a matter of policy Ridge do not appoint third parties on behalf of clients so the cilents must appoint directly.

Addtionaly the clients must satisfy themselbes that they are happy to proceed with the recommend 3rd parties and Ridge takes no responsibility for the quality of their services

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What did you consider when evaluating the tender returns from contractors?

A

I reviewed the tender returns with the project QS; we looked for discrepancies in the tenders, which might indicate a misunderstanding of the required scope, such as very high or low prices.

We also considered the number and sum of provisional sums provided by the contractors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What went into the tender report? Overford

A

I jointly prepared the tender report for the project QS.

it included:

-a summary of the tender costs and any changes made during the clarification period and proposed programme period
-it directly compared the costs from the two tenders including for prelims etc
-Our recommendation to appoint Kingerlee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

How did you conduct the clarification process?

A

We used a scott schedule to record answers and responses to queries we raised following a review of the tenders.

When we closed out as many as possible via email, we invited each tenderer to a sit down meeting to work out the remaining items. These meetings were minuted for the record.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What guidance is available for dealing with clarifications under a JCT contract tender process?

A

Both the RICS and JCT publish guidance on tendering.

It is important that clarifications during the tender process are issued to all tender’s to insure they have access to the same information.

Clarifications agreed with tenderers as part of their return will be included in the contract documents.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What did you cover in the pre-start meeting

A
  • a summary of the works
    -the contractor’s design portion
  • the overall programme
  • contract and finance
  • insurances
  • statutory consents
  • CDM/ health and safety
  • communication lines
  • Quality control
    -Contractors matters
  • RFIs
24
Q

What was included in progress meetings?

A

Progress meetings would start with covering actions from the previous meeting
Then the contractor would present their progress report
-contractors matters
-employers matters
- RFI’s
-H&S
-AoB

25
Q

What was covered by the hand over meeting?

A
  • building control sign-off
  • clients handover checklist
  • electrical witnessing
    -mechanical witnessing
  • mechanical demonstrations
  • removal of site setup
    -Keys/ site hand over
    -end of defects snagging
26
Q

What did you review during weekly site visit inspections and what was included in the reports?

A

The reports inculded a short description of the works done in the week, who was present at the site visit, the weather and any outstanding information or requests. Then it would be made up of photos of the works.

  • I reviewed the progress made in the week and compared this to the project programme
    -I looked at the quality of the works and any items I was not satisfied with
  • I looked at h&S risks I identified on-site
27
Q

Explain the process and procedures under the JCT contract for dealing with claim for extension of time.

A
  • Under a JCT the to assess a EoT the contractor should submit a notification of likely delay as soon as they become aware that the programme might be impacted.

when the delay has materialised, the contractor can submit a claim for an extension of time and the evidence for their entitlement.

The CA must look at the evidence in a fair and impartial way to include if the delay was caused by a relevant event which entilites the contractor to a EoT under the JCT.

The CA can then do an assessment on the extent of the actual delay to the programme by comparing programmes, site visit reports and evidence.

The CA must provide a response to the contractor within 12 weeks. However the new JCT 2024 contracts have changed this to 8 weeks.

28
Q

What do you mean by and how did you evaluate whether there was concurrent delay?

A

Concurrent delay is where two delays which are un-related occur, or their effects occur at the same time.

To elevate the concurrent delay, I produced two ‘what if’ project programs:

One which showed there had been no client-side delay, when would the project have been completed based on when the works unrelated to the client delay were actually carried out, and one showing the actual total project delay.

This showed that even if the client-side delay had not happened, the contractor would not have completed the project by the contract completion date, or the date given by the Eot

29
Q

What is the effect of a certificate of non-completion?

A

A non-completion certificate being issued means that the client can claim for liquidated damages from that point until the works are completed.

30
Q

What is the purpose / effect of a practical completion certificate?

A

The PC cert starts the defect period,

it means LADs can no longer be claimed.

If there is a retenion typically 2.5% will be released at this point

Handover can then happen

31
Q

How did you decide whether / when practical completion had been reached?

A

Once the works are completed, barring very minor snags or outstanding works that do not prevent beneficial occupation.

32
Q

What is the process as CA for the production of certificates for payment?

A

A valuation is conucted as per the valuation schedule set out in the contract

The due date is 7 days after the relevant ‘Interim Valuation Date’

The CA should issue its certificate within 5 days after the due date

Payment shpuld be made within 14 days after the due date

33
Q

How did you evaluate the validity of variations costs? What information did you request, how did you review?

A

I requested a substantiation such as invoices of the variation costs and compared these to the works actually carried out and works included within other variations. and negoatied on each one with the contractor where the claimed cost did not match the evidence.

all variations were jointly reviewed by myself and the project QS before formal instruction.

34
Q

How did you review whether variations had an impact on the project programme?

A

Before instructing any variation I would confirm with the contractor there expected time implications when the works were then instructed this was done subject to the time implications stated.

35
Q

How did you / would you determine if bats may be present in a building?

A

On this project we were provided with the pervious bat report stating there had previously been bats in the building.

Additionally, the type of roofing makes it a likely to be in use by bats, and I identified droppings in the roof void that could have been bats or vermin.

Following these signs, I would always recommend an ecologist perform a PRA.

36
Q

When would a PRA be required?

A

A PRA is typically a requirement for planning permission or LBC applications where there is potential that bats could be using the building.

The PRA indicates whether the building is suitable for use for bats and will need further activity surveys or whether it is not suitable for bats.

37
Q

What is / was included in the Planning Application?

A
  • The application form
  • Design and access statement
  • heritage statement and impact assessment
  • existing and proposed drawings
  • evidence of condition such as the roof survey
38
Q

Did you prepare and submit the application to the LPA? How did you do this?

A

I prepared the documentation and developed the drawings with our CAD tech. After the client approved it, the application was submitted through the planning portal.

39
Q

What legislation covers Planning and development work.

A

The town and country planning act 1990

40
Q

Noting the likely slow response times from the LPA, what did you / could you do to improve this?

A

Unfortunately, there isn’t much you can do, I would email the planning officer regularly to ask for updates

41
Q

What are the expected timescales for dealing with a Planning Application?

A

The standard statuory period for a planning application determination is 8 weeks, however due to the pressure on LPA’s very few applications meet this timescale, particularly listed buildings. I advised my client that they should allow at least 16 weeks however the final period was over 19 weeks.

42
Q

How did you deal with the risk of planning timescales in the development of the project programme?

A

I advised my client that they should allow at least 16 weeks for the planning period.

43
Q

What would be the repercussions of proceeding before consent was granted? Who would be at risk, what action could be taken, what sanctions could result?

A

Unauthorised works to listed buildings could result in up to two tears in prison and an unlimited fine for both the property owner, anyone who instructed the work and the builder carrying out the works. Typically, however, a further application to retain the works carried out might be required, and if rejected, the works would have to be removed and the property reinstated to its previous condition.

44
Q

How did you / would you obtain the LPA’s agreement to proceed with limited works in advance of a consent?

A

I spoke with the conservation officer verbally and confirmed in writing via email that the works package we intended were works that would not require LBC.

45
Q

What is included in mobilisation period? How do you assess the period required for mobilisation?

A

Moblisation period should be no less than 4 weeks to allow the contractor to make the appropriate health and safety and logistics arrangements for the works, more complex jobs need a longer period.

allows the contractor time to arrange their project set up, place orders for long lead items and arrange sub-contractors. It also allows for the completion of documentation.

The mobilisation period can be negotiated with the contractor on how long they need; a period that is too short may not give sufficient time to properly arrange site setup and site safety and could risk being a breach of CDM regulations and health and safety at work act.

Typically, I have suggested a minimum of 4 weeks; on Overford Farm, the planned period was 6 weeks.

46
Q

What do you understand would be covered by ‘preliminaries’ costs?

A

Prelim costs are the costs associated with preparing, managing, administering, and operating the construction site, but they do not form part of the actual works. This could include site welfare units, scaffold the site foreman cost

47
Q

What options are open to the LPA if development starts prior to obtaining a consent?

A

The LPA can issue enforcement notices and stop notices for breaches of planning regulations. If the notice is not complied with, the LPA can prosecute.

48
Q

If the full scope of works was included within the contract, what contractual mechanisms did you consider for limiting the work the contractor could do before LBC was obtained?

A

Not sure - contract varaiation??

49
Q

How could you have assessed the availability of adequate rubble stone to undertake the repairs prior to entering into the works?

A

I would probably needed to seek the advice from a stonemason

50
Q

What is the effect of a contract instruction?

A

A contract instruction varies the contract allowing for changes to the agreed works and costs.

51
Q

What is the purpose of a Design and Access Statement?

A

A design and access statement sets out the design philosy of the project and how particular elements key to planning have been approach such as vehicle access, accessibility, how the building response to its surroundings.

52
Q

What goes into Design and Access Statement?

A

On Overford Farm, we inculded the heritage impact assessment in the design and access statement.

  • a site overview
  • details of the location
  • details of each element of the proposal and justification
  • Access considerations
  • Sustainability considerations
    -ecological considerations
53
Q

How was contingency handled within the project? Was there a contract contingency? What level of contingency did you / would you recommend for this project?

A

The project contingency was recommended by the project QS. It was held bu the client as part of the project funding.

On a historic building i would recommend a construction contingency of 15%

54
Q

How was the expenditure of contingency authorised?

A

During client meetings, I would present the variation tracker in full, showing the estimated remaining continency and ask for the client’s approval for each variation. Their decision would be minuted.

55
Q

What did you check in the contractor’s cost submissions to establish if they were fair and in line with the scope of work?

A

I would look out for unusually high or low costs, which may indicate a misunderstanding of what was required. During the tender stage, we compared the two tenders’ costs. Where there was a significant decrease, we asked the contract to confirm what allowances they had made and their understanding before issuing a clarification to both parties if required.

56
Q

Were there any / what were the conditions attached to the LPA consent?

A

There were no conditions requiring discharge attached the consent. The only conditions beyond the standards conditions were to use compatible material, comply with the bat survey report recommendations, and to provide fencing 5 meters the edge of the river to prevent pollution.

57
Q

What would you consider when assessing time required for discharge of conditions in future projects?

A

I would encourage clients generally to arrange statutory consent as early as possible, allowing additional time for tackling discharge of conditions.