the supreme court upholding existing policy (Whole Woman’s Health v Hellerstedt (2016)) 4.3 Flashcards
What was the main issue in the Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt case?
The case concerned a Texas law imposing strict requirements on abortion providers.
What was the Supreme Court’s ruling in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt?
The Court struck down the Texas law, ruling it placed substantial obstacles on women seeking abortions, violating the Constitution.
What was the vote count in the Supreme Court’s decision?
The decision was 5-3, with Justice Kennedy joining the liberal justices.
Who wrote the majority opinion in this case?
Justice Breyer wrote the majority opinion.
How does this case relate to Roe v. Wade?
It upheld the precedent set by Roe v. Wade (1973), which recognised a woman’s right to choose abortion as part of personal liberty.
What previous case attempted to erode the protections of Roe v. Wade?
Gonzales v. Carhart (2007), which upheld the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act.
What does the outcome of Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt suggest about future Supreme Court decisions on abortion?
It indicates that while judicial precedents can be upheld, future decisions, particularly from the conservative Roberts Court, could challenge abortion rights.
