The current composition and ideological balance of the Supreme Court 4.2 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

swing justice

A

swing justice is the centrist judge who often finds themselves holding the decisive casting vote in a 5—4 split

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Strict constructionist

A

A Supreme Court justice who interprets the Constitution strictly or literally, and tends to stress the retention of power by individual states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Loose constructionist

A

A Supreme Court justice who interprets the Constitution less literally, and tends to stress the broad grants of power to the federal government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Originalism

A

A Supreme Court justice who interprets the Constitution in line with the meaning or intent of the framers at the time of enactment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Living constitution

A

The Constitution considered as a dynamic, living document, interpretation of which should take account of the views of contemporary society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Judicial activism

A

A term traditionally associated with more liberal judges. It sees the Constitution as a ‘living document’ rather than as a static text. It involves an approach to judicial decision making that holds that the courts should use their position to promote desirable social ends. Such an approach focuses more on the ‘spirit’ of the Constitution rather than the precise wording.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what important key cases has the WARREN COURT done

A
  • Brown vs Board of Education of Topeka 1954 (declaring racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional)
  • Miranda v Arizona 1966 (rights of individuals under police custody)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what important key cases has the BURGER COURT done

A
  • New York Times v United States 1971 ( bolstered the freedom of the press against prior restraint by the government {pentagon papers with nixon and vietnam})
  • Roe v Wade 1973 (declared abortions as constitutional)
  • United States v Nixon 1974 ( clarified the limits of presidential power [watergate scandal])
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what important key cases has the REHNQUIST COURT done

A
  • United States v Lopez 1995 (limited Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause)
  • Bush vs Gore 2000 (case that stopped Florida’s vote recount in the 2000 election)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how many decisions are done UNANIMOUSLY in the supreme court

A

36%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how many decisions are done LARGE MAJORITIES in the supreme court

A

15%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

how many decisions are done 5-4 in the supreme court

A

19%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

explain briefly ‘Masterpiece Cakeshop v Colorado Civil Rights Commission.’

A
  • same sex couple walks in
  • baker said they won’t bake for them as they are gay
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is chief justices robert’s quote on being a justice

A

Judges are like umpires. Umpires don’t make the rules, they apply them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

who’s a really well known swing judge

A

chief justice roberts
sided liberal with cases such as:
- Department of Homeland Security v Regents of the University of California = programme protecting young undocumented immigrants known as Dreamers

  • June Medical Services LLC v Russo = abortion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what example could we use when saying that a majority republican supreme court means nothing

A

Trump and his complaints that his 2020 election have been rigged (Kelly v Pennsylvania and Texas v Pennsylvania)