the Supreme Court establishing new policy 4.3 Flashcards
Obergefell v Hodges (2015)
challenging state bans on same-sex marriage as violations of the Fourteenth Amendment
why was justice kennedy’s statement on this case so significant
Obergefell v Hodges (2015)
- he used the word dignity 9 times
- illustrating a loose constructionist approach to constitutional interpretation
why was this case so important for the role of th supremem court in contemporary society
Obergefell v Hodges (2015)
highlighting the influential role of the Supreme Court in shaping legal and social norms.
Carpenter v United States (2018)
- Timothy Carpenter was convicted of aiding a robbery based on cell phone location data obtained by the government without a warrant.
- He appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that this violated his Fourth Amendment right to privacy.
ultimately, what did this case imply about the 4th ammendment
Carpenter v United States (2018)
- the Supreme Court established new legal standards for the use of cell phone data
- providing clarity in an area previously marked by ambiguity regarding privacy rights.
what was a case where the Supreme Court shaped public policy through inaction
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas v Jegley (2018)
What was the Arkansas law challenged in the Supreme Court?
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas v Jegley (2018)
The law required abortion providers to have contracts with doctors for complications from abortion-inducing drugs, severely restricting access to abortions.
What was the Supreme Court’s decision regarding the case?
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas v Jegley (2018)
The Supreme Court refused to hear the case, which effectively allowed the Arkansas law to stand.
What was the impact of the Supreme Court’s inaction?
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas v Jegley (2018)
Following the refusal to hear the case, Planned Parenthood announced it would stop providing medication abortions in Arkansas.
Did the Supreme Court justices provide a reason for their refusal to hear the case?
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas v Jegley (2018)
No, the justices did not give a reason, but their inaction suggested a reluctance to uphold abortion rights.
How did public figures react to the Supreme Court’s decision?
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas v Jegley (2018)
Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge praised the decision as a victory for protecting women and unborn children, while Planned Parenthood’s Dawn Laguens criticised Arkansas for banning medication abortion and highlighted the dangers of the law.