factors that reinforce/undermine the Supreme court 1.4 Flashcards
Factors that reinforce Supreme Court independence
- congress and power to change composition
- life tenure
- constitutional independence
- the ABA
How does ‘ congress and power to change composition ‘ reinforce Supreme Court independence
- hasn’t been able to change since 1869
- limited amount of people so can’t jam pack people from political bias
- over 150 years of independence this way
How does ‘ life tenure’ reinforce Supreme Court independence
- cannot be dismissed without senate’s 2/3 majority
- Article 3 means that their salary cannot be altered during their job as a judge
- means they can vote however they like without threat from the president or other external actors
How does ‘ constitutional independence ‘ reinforce Supreme Court independence
- constitutional independence means that the supreme court can perform ‘judicial review’ on other branches of government
How does ‘ the ABA ‘ reinforce Supreme Court independence
- independent interest group
- categorise judge into ‘not qualified, qualified and well qualified’
Factors that undermine Supreme Courts’ independence
- congress can alter composition
- impeachment process
- supreme court lacks enforcement powers
- independence of ABA
- presidential nomination
How does ‘ congress can alter composition ‘ undermine Supreme Court independence
- Roosevelt and Biden considered changing the number of supreme court justices to a higher number to help their party
- Roosevelt = new deal 1930’s
How does ‘ impeachment process ‘ undermine Supreme Court independence
- supermajority of the senate, 2/3 will kick them out
- shows that they are still dependent
How does ‘ supreme court lacks enforcement powers ‘ undermine Supreme Court independence
- Brown v Board of Education of Topeka
(1954) - supreme courts makes decisions but doesn’t have power to enforce
How does ‘ independence of ABA ‘ undermine Supreme Court independence
- that female and minority judicial nominees
are generally more likely to receive lower ratings - Clarence Thomas was only deemed ‘qualified’
How does ‘ presidential nomination ‘ undermine Supreme Court independence
- all originally nominated by the president so already there is a bias