CASE STUDY: Madison vs Marbury & Fletcher vs Peck 4.1 Flashcards
1
Q
synopsis of what happened in Marbury v Madison (1803)
A
- Supreme Court granting itself the power of judicial review over federal issues.
2
Q
what is the story of Marbury v Madison (1803)
A
- before Jefferson came into power, Adams appointed new judgeships to keep control of his party outside of his mandate
- Marbury was the last one in but was going to be appointed once Jefferson was in office, he asked Madison to rebuke that
- Marbury petitioned the Supreme Court
3
Q
what was the judgement of Marbury v Madison (1803)
A
- Supreme Court favoured Marbury
- the Judiciary Act meant that Madison did not have to honour the appointment
- JOHN MARSHALL declared Judiciary act as unconstitutional
- FIRST CASE OF JUDICIAL REVIEW
4
Q
The constitutional significance of the judgement against Marbury v Madison (1803)
A
- judicial review is not mentioned in the constitution but Supreme court did it anyway
- that the Supreme Court would thereafter decide the constitutionality of the law
5
Q
synopsis of what happened in Fletcher v Peck (1810)
A
- the first time the Supreme Court ruled against a state law
- extending the power of judicial review to state law as well as federal law
6
Q
what is the story of Fletcher v Peck (1810)
A
- Georgia legislature was selling 35 million acres of land for 1.5cents the acre
- the land was fraudulent and was sold to Fletcher in 1975
- in 1976, Fletcher found out it was fraudulent so sued Peck and brought it up to the State courts
- State courts favoured Peck so Fletcher took it to the supreme court
7
Q
what was the judgement of Fletcher v Peck (1810)
A
- Supreme Court deemed Georgian state’s actions as ‘deplorable’
- Supreme court told Georgia that they must repeal the grant as it was ‘unconstitutional’
- Georgia’s law repealing the grants was struck down
- FIRST CASE OF SUPREME COURT RULING AGAINST STATE LAW
8
Q
The constitutional significance of the judgement of Fletcher v Peck (1810)
A
- judicial review over federal issues had now extended its power to state law.
- these two judgements significantly enhanced the jurisdiction of Supreme Court judgements.