Sociology-theory and methods-Marxism Flashcards

1
Q

How is Marxism similar to Durkheim’s functionalist ideas?

A

Like Durkheim, Marx saw both harm caused by the modern industrial society that was taking shape in 19th century Europe, and the promise of progress to a better world that it held. Also like Durkheim, Marx believed it was possible to understand society scientifically and this knowledge would point the way to a better society-he described his theory as ‘scientific socialism’. In these ways, Marxism is a continuation of the Enlightenment project

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does Marxism differ from functionalism?

A

Unlike functionalists, Marx did not see progress as a smooth and gradual evolution. Instead he saw historical change as a contradictory process in which capitalism would increase human misery before giving way to a classless communist society in which human beings would be free to fulfil their potential

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How was Marx described?

A

He was not just a theorist; he was also a revolutionary socialist. As he himself wrote, ‘philosophers have merely interpreted the world; the point, however, is to change it’. In other words, the classless society would need to be brought into being by conscious human action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What happened after Marx’s death?

A

After his death, Marx’s ideas came to form basis of communism, a political movement that was enormously influential in shaping the modern world, and Marxism became the official doctrine of the former Soviet Union and other communist states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were Marx’s seven key ideas

A

Historical materialism, class society and exploitation, capitalism, class consciousness, ideology, alienation, and the state, revolution and communism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is historic materialism?

A

Materialism=humans have material needs eg food/clothing/shelter, so have to work to meet them. Forces of production used to do this. Earliest stage of human history was unaided human labour, but then developed tools/machines to assist. Humans also cooperate with each other in working to meet needs. Social relations of production-ways of organising production. Over time forces of production grow and develop and social relations of production change. Division of labour develops eventually bringing division between two classes-working and ruling classes. Production is then directed by the ruling class to meet own needs. Marx refers to forces/relations of production together as the m ode of production eg currently we live in a society with a capitalist mode of production which forms the economic base of society that shapes/determines the superstructure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is class society and exploitation?

A

Earliest stage of human history=no classes/private ownership/exploitation-everyone works and everything is shared. Marx called this ‘primitive communism’. But as forces develop, different types of class society come/go. In class societies one class own means of production and exploit the other and in particular they control society’s surplus product. Marx identifies three successive class societies: ancient society (based on exploitation of slaves legally tied to their owners), feudal society (based on exploitation of serfs legally tied to the land), and capitalist society (based on exploitation of free wage labourers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is capitalism?

A

Based on class divisions (proletariat and bourgeoisie). Proletariat are legally free but wages are not an equal exchange-bourgeoisie keep surplus value. Competition between capitalists means ownership of means of production becomes concentrated-fewer own more causing immiseration of the proletariat . Capitalism continually expands forces of production in pursuit of profit-production becomes concentrated while technological advances de-skill the workforce. Concentration of ownership and deskilling of proletariat produces class polarisation-minority capitalist class and majority working class

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is class consciousness?

A

Marx-capitalism sows seeds of own destruction eg by polarising classes, bringing the proletariat together in even-larger numbers, and diving down their wages, capitalism creates the conditions under which working class can develop a consciousness of its own economic and political interests in opposition to those of its exploiters. As a result, proletariat moves from being a class in itself to a class for itself whose members are class conscious-aware of need to overthrow capitalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is ideology?

A

Marx-class that owns means of production also owns/controls means of mental production-production of ideas. Dominant ideas in society are the ideas of the economically dominant class. Institutions produce and spread these ideas such as religion, education and media, all serve dominant class by producing ideologies (sets of ideas/beliefs that legitimate existing social order as desirable/inevitable. Ideology fosters a false consciousness in subordinate classes and helps sustain class inequality. However, as capitalism impoverishes workers, they develop class consciousness. They see through capitalist ideology and are conscious of their true position as ‘wage slaves’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is alienation?

A

Marx-our true nature is based on capacity to create things to meet needs. Alienation is result of loss of control over our labour/its products and therefore our separation from our true nature. Alienation exists in all class societies as owners control production process for own needs. However under capitalism alienation reaches its peak as workers are completely separated from/have no control over forces of production, and the division of labour is at its most intense and detailed (worker reduced to an unskilled labourer mindlessly repeating a meaningless task). Marx also sees religion as originating in the alienation of human labour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the state, revolution and communism?

A

Marx defines state as ‘armed bodies of me’ (army/prisons/courts etc). State exists to protect interests of class owners who control it. Form the ruling class and use state as a weapon in class struggle to protect their property, suppress opposition and prevent revolution. Any class that wishes to lead a revolution/become economically dominant must overthrow existing ruling class. The proletarian revolution that overthrows capitalism will be the first revolution by the majority against the minority. It will abolish the state/create classless communist society, abolish exploitation, replace private ownership with social ownership, and replace production for profit with production to satisfy human needs, and it will end alienation as humans regain control of their labour/its products

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How has Marx’s predictions of revolution led to debate among Marxists?

A

He predicted the ultimate victory of the proletarian revolution and the establishment of communist society on a world scale. He expected the revolution to occur first of all in the most advanced capitalist societies. However, he wrote relatively little about exactly how the revolution would come about

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What two parts of Marx’s views have been criticised?

A

Marx’s view of class, and economic determinism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why has Marx’s view of class been criticised?

A

Simplistic, one dimensional view of inequality as he sees class as the only important division. Weber argues status and power differences can also be important sources of inequality, independently of class eg power elite can rule without actually owning means of production (Soviet Union). Feminists argue gender is a more fundamental source of inequality. Marx’s two-class model is simplistic-Weber sub-divides the proletariat into skilled and unskilled classes, and includes a white collar middle class of office workers and a petty bourgeoisie (small capitalists). Also class polarisation has not occurred, instead of middle class being swallowed up by expanding proletariat, it has grown and the industrial working class has shrunk in Western countries (though the proletariat is grown in China/India due to globalisation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why has Marx been criticised for economic determinism?

A

Marx’s base superstructure model is economically deterministic (view that economic factors are the sole cause of everything in society including social change). Critics argue this fails to recognise humans have free will to bring about change through conscious actions. The base-superstructure neglects the role of ideas (eg Weber argues it was emergence of new ideas that brought modern capitalism (ideas of Calvinistic Protestantism). Marx’s predictions have not come true, it is only economically backward countries such as Russia in 1917 that have seen Marxist-led revolutions

17
Q

What is a defence for Marx in response to the criticisms for economic determinism?

A

While there are examples of economic determinism in his work, there are also instances where he argues ‘men make their own history’ and the working class would free themselves by their own conscious efforts-indicating he gave a role to human action as well as economic forces

18
Q

What has happened since Marx’s death in 1883?

A

The absence of revolutions in the West has led many Marxists to reject the economic determinism of the base-superstructure model. Instead they have tried to explain why capitalism has persisted and how it might be overthrown. There are two broad approaches to these questions, which Gouldner describes as humanistic or critical marxism eg Gramsci (has some similarities with action theories and interpretive sociology), and scientific or structuralist marxism eg Althusser (structural approach and has similarities with positivist sociology)

19
Q

What is the most important example of humanistic Marxism?

A

Gramsci, who introduces the concept of hegemony, or ideological and moral leadership of society to explain how the ruling class maintains its position. he argues that the proletariat must develop its own ‘counter-hegemony’ to win the leadership of society from the bourgeoisie

20
Q

Who was Gramsci?

A

Gramsci was the first leader of the Italian Communist Party during the 1920s. He rejects economic determinism as an explanation of change: the transition from capitalism to communism will never come about simply as a result of economic forces. Even though factors such as mass unemployment and falling wages may create the preconditions for revolution, ideas play a central role in determining whether or not change will actually occur. This can be seen in Gramsci’s concept of hegemony

21
Q

What is Gramsci’s concept of hegemony?

A

Gramsci sees the ruling class maintaining its dominance over society in two ways: coercion (uses the army, police, prisons and courts of the capitalist state to force other classes to accept its rule), and consent/hegemony (uses ideas and values to persuade the subordinate classes that its rule is legitimate)

22
Q

How is hegemony used in advanced capitalist societies?

A

In advanced capitalist societies, the ruling class rely heavily on consent to maintain their rule. Gramsci agrees with Marx that they are able to do so because they control the institutions that produce and spread ideas, such as the media, the education system and religion. So long as the rest of society accepts ruling-class hegemony, there will not be a revolution, even when the economic conditions might seem favourable

23
Q

What are the two reasons why the hegemony of the ruling class is never complete?

A

The ruling class are a minority (to rule, they need to create a power bloc by making alliances with other groups, such as the middle classes. They must therefore make ideological compromises to take account of the interests of their allies), and the proletariat have a dual consciousness (their ideas are influenced not only by bourgeois ideology, but also by their material conditions of life-the poverty and exploitation they experience. This means they can ‘see through’ the dominant ideology to some degree)

24
Q

What does the fact that the hegemony of the ruling class is never complete, mean?

A

There is always the possibility of ruling class hegemony being undermined, particularly at times of economic crisis, when worsening material conditions and increased poverty of proletariat causes them to question the status quo. However, this will only lead to revolution if the proletariat are able to construct a counter-hegemonic bloc. In other words, they must be able to offer moral and ideological leadership to society

25
Q

What are Gramsci’s views on the success of a revolution?

A

The working class can only win this battle for ideas by producing their own ‘organic intellectuals’, meaning a body of class conscious workers, organised into a revolutionary political party, able to formulate an alternative version of how society could be run in the future. This counter-hegemony would win ideological leadership from the ruling class by offering a new version of how society should be organised, based on socialist rather than capitalist values

26
Q

What are the criticisms of Gramsci?

A

Accused of over-emphasising role of ideas and under-emphasising role of state coercion and economic factors, eg workers may see through ruling class ideology and wish to overthrow capitalism, but be reluctant to try due to fear of state repression or unemployment, so tolerate it as they feel they have no choice. Sociologists working within marxist framework adopted similar approach to Gramsci, stressing role of ideas/consciousness as basis for resisting domination/changing society, eg Willis describes working class lads as ‘partially penetrating’ bourgeois ideology-seeing through school’s ideology to recognise myth of meritocracy. These writers often draw on perspectives such as interactionism (emphasise role of ideas and meanings as basis for action-sometimes therefore called neo-marxists

27
Q

Who is the most important structuralist Marxist thinker?

A

Althusser. A leading intellectual of the French Communist Party. Althusser’s version of Marxism rejects both economic determinism and humanism. He criticises the base-superstructure model, and criticises humanism. He also talks about ideological and repressive state apparatuses

28
Q

What does Althusser reject Marx’s original base-superstructure model in favour of?

A

A more complex model, which Craib calls ‘structural determinism’ which sees capitalist society as having three structures/levels: Economic level (comprising all activities involved in producing something in order to satisfy a need), the political level (comprising all forms of organisation), and the ideological level (involving the ways people see themselves in the world). Craib uses the analogy of a three storey building with a shop, office and family house, to describe this structure

29
Q

How does Althusser’s model differ from Marx’s model?

A

In the base superstructure model, there is a one-way causality: the economic level determines everything about the other two levels. By contrast, in Althusser’s model, the political and ideological levels have relative autonomy or partial independence from the economic level. The political and ideological levels are not a mere reflection of the economic level, and can even affect what happens in the economy. Instead of a one-way causality, there is two-way causality

30
Q

In Althusser’s model the state performs political and ideological functions to endure reproduction of capitalism-how does he divide the state?

A

Repressive state apparatuses (These are the ‘armed bodies of men’-army/police/prisons etc, that coerce the working class into complying with the will of the bourgeoisie. This is how Marxists have traditionally seen the state), and ideological state apparatuses (These include the media, education system, family, reformist political parties, trade unions and other institutions. ISAs ideologically manipulate the working class into accepting capitalism as legitimate. This is a much wider definition of the state than the traditional Marxist view). These are similar to Gramsci’s distinction between coercion and consent as ways of securing dominance of bourgeoisie

31
Q

How does Althusser criticise humanism?

A

For structuralist marxists, free will/choice/creativity=illusions. Truth is everything is product of underling social structures. As Craib says, society is a puppet theatre, we are merely puppets, these unseen structures are the hidden puppet masters determining out thoughts/actions. Althusser is dismissive of humanism, including humanistic Marxists such as Gramsci, as they believe people use creativity/reason/free will to change society eg socialist revolution as result of class consciousness and conscious choice to overthrow capitalism. Althusser says we are not free agents-choice is false consciousness produced by ISAs, eg myth of meritocracy in education. Althusser says socialism will only come as a result of a crisis in capitalism due to over-determination: the contradictions in three structures occur relatively independently of each other, resulting in collapse of system as a whole

32
Q

What is the evaluation of Althusser?

A

Claims to oppose humanism/determinism, but he is harsher than humanism. He rejects economic determinism but replaces it with more complex ‘structural determinism’. Humanistic marxists say this ‘scientific’ approach discourages political activism as it stresses the role of structural factors that individuals can do little to affect. Thompson criticises Althusser for ignoring that active struggles of working class can change society, and accuses him of elitism. In Craib’s view, Althusser offers the most sophisticated conception of social structure available in the social science, however, ironically, while Althusser believed he was developing scientific analysis of society to help bring progress to better society, his structuralist Marxism has been major influence on theories such as postmodernism that reject very idea that scientific knowledge can be used to improve society