Social Influence- Milgram (obediance) Flashcards
What are the two explanations of obedience?
-Situational attribution
-Dispositional attribution
Define situational attribution
-Inferring that a persons behaviour is caused by something about the situation they are in
Define dispositional attribution
-Inferring that the reason for a persons behaviour is something about themselves such as their personality
What was the aim of mailgrams study?
-To find out whether ordinary Americans would obey unjust orders from a person of authority to inflict pain on another person
How was the study advertised?
-In a local newspaper
-Paid $4.50
-A study about how punishment affects learning
How many volunteers was there and where were they from?
-40
-A range of backgrounds
How were the learners selected?
-Through a rigged draw so it would be the confederates
What was the procedure
-Teacher was required to administer electric shocks after every wrong answer
-gave the Learner a trigger word which was matched with a word that the Learner had (supposedly) memorised
-Teacher was given a mild shock before hand to prove that the machine was real
-Started at 15 volts and went up 15 every time, max was 450
What was heard up to 300 volts?
-Screams (pre recorded and fake) but they stopped at 300 volts
What were the results?
-100% delivered shocks up until 300
-65% delivered shocks up until 450
-Much higher than they expected
What was the conclusion of this study?
-People obey instructions from authoritive figures even if it harms another participant
-destructive obedience is not a result of nationality or personal factors but is instead made possible by specific situational factors
What happened if the teacher asked to stop?
-Prompted to carry on
- “this experiment requires you to continue”
-“you have no other choice you must continue
Why were the controls kept the same for every participant?
-So there were few exrentaneous variables
What were the consequences of this study?
-Suffered extreme nervous tension- nervous laughing
-Physically sweating
-Continually asking for reassurance from experimenter
-One participant had an epileptic fit
How were the participants debriefed after the experiment?
-Told their behaviour was normal
-Told the nature of the experiment
-Followed up a year later to ensure there was no lasting psychological problems
Give 3 strengths of this study
-Reliable- standardised procedure
-Helps to explain real life situations
-study identified important factors that affect a persons obedience of legitimacy of authority
Give 3 weaknesses of this study
-Lacks temporal validity
-Lacks internal validity
-Breaks ethical guidelines
Why were there variations of the original experiment?
-To see which factors increased/ decrease obedience
Which factors increase obedience?
-Legitimacy of authority
-Social isolation
-Proximity to victim
-Gradual commitment
-Deferred responsibility
Why is the study being unethical a limitation?
P- Broke ethical guidelines set out in 1953
E-Deceived- told them they were investigating the effect of punishment and learning when he was measuring obedediance and lied about the electric shocks
-Right to withdraw- very difficult, prompted to carry on
Harm-Very stressed+ anxious
L- An issue because the volunteers felt guilt about possibly harming another participant
means that the study cannot be replicated today
Counter: Essential to deceive and remove the right of withdrawal from the participants to get valid results
Why is ecological validity a weakness of this study?
P-Lacks ecological validity
E-tested obedience in a lab, very different to real life situations
E-People are normally asked to follow subtle instructions not administer electric shocks
L-Cannot generalise findings to real life situations, people may obey less severe instructions differently
Why is low population validity a limitation?
P-Lacks population validity
E-Bias sample of 40 men- underepresentitve
E-cannot generalise to the whole population particularly females
L-Cannot conclude that females would respond in the same way
Counter: Did include men from various different backgrounds so some cultural diversity
What were the 6 variations of Milgram’s study?
-Someone lese administered the shock
-The experiment took place in a rundown office building
-The teacher and learner were in the same room
-The teacher had to force the learners hand onto the shock plate
-The experimenter gave instructions to the teacher over the phone
-Participants worked in groups to shock the learner (two rebelled and refused to go on
What were the percentages of the participants who administered 450 volts in each of the variations?
-Someone lese administered the shock- 92.5%
-The experiment took place in a rundown office building- 48%
-The teacher and learner were in the same room- 40%
-The teacher had to force the learners hand onto the shock plate- 30%
-The experimenter gave instructions to the teacher over the phone-20%
-Participants worked in groups to shock the learner (two rebelled and refused to go on- 10%