Social Combat part 2 Flashcards
Group combat strategies
- Coordinated nest and territory defense.
- Coordinated defense of resources.
- Coordinated attacks/defenses.
- Combat castes.
- Structural defenses.
group combat strategies - which are considered “Combat contexts”
- Coordinated nest and territory defense.
- Coordinated defense of resources.
group combat strategies - which are considered “Combat strategies”
- Coordinated attacks/defenses.
- Combat castes.
- Structural defenses.
what are the Lanchester’s laws of combat
- A case where human conflict has helped us understand animal conflict
- it was used to predict the outcome of human warfare
which of Lanchester’s laws of combat can be used to help explain the evolution of combat in animal societies
Lanchester’s “Square law” and “Linear law”
Lanchester’s square law of combat - what are the assumptions
every member of one side has an equal chance of being attacked by every member of the other side, and vice versa.
Lanchester’s square law of combat - Conceptualizes a battle as what?
swarms on a completely open battle field
Lanchester’s square law of combat - Under these assumptions, the theory predicts what?
- Individuals on the smaller side can be attacked by more than one individual on the other side — strength in numbers.
- Individual fighting prowess does not matter.
- Individuals are killed at a rate that is proportional to the size of the opposing side.
- The side with the most individuals will ultimately win — “last individual standing” outcome
Lanchester’s linear law of combat - what are the assumptions
individuals are forced into a series of one-on one battles, or duels, with no group attacks.
Lanchester’s linear law of combat - Conceptualizes a battle on what?
a highly restricted plane of combat
Lanchester’s linear law of combat - Under these assumptions, the theory predicts what?
- Extra individuals on the larger side remain unengaged until a member of the other side is free to attack.
- Individual fighting prowess determines the outcome of each duel.
- The side with the most powerful fighters will win.
Lanchester’s linear law of combat - what is it based on
- legend of 300 Spartans
- known for being highly skilled soldiers, holding the entire Persian army in check in a narrow mountain pass
what predictions do Lanchester’s laws provide?
provide predictions for how the evolutionary arms race between societies will play out, and what kind of adaptations should be favored
Lanchester’s laws and the evolution of social combat - In any given interaction, what series of key questions can be asked?
- Is it a competitive or predator-prey interaction?
- What is the configuration of the combat arena?
- What combat traits are individuals equipped with from their evolutionary history?
- Does individual fighting prowess matter, and what adaptations might selection favor?
Coordinated nest defense vs. territory defense - nest defense
The nest is a highly restricted combat arena, with narrow entrances and tunnels — scenario approximates the conditions of the linear law.
Coordinated nest defense vs. territory defense - What kind of adaptations might we see in nest defense?
- Adaptations that enhance individual fighting prowess are likely to be selected.
- We might also expect team fighting strategies — a way to increase fighting prowess beyond the maximum prowess of a single individual.
Coordinated nest defense vs. territory defense - Territory defense
larger, open combat arena where interactions approach the assumptions of the square law.
Coordinated nest defense vs. territory defense: Territory defense - Would we expect to see soldiers at territory boundaries?
No bc fighting prowess is not important
coordinated nest defense vs territory defense: territory defense - What adaptations would we expect?
- Evolution of “sentry” behavior by lots of small fighters is common at territory borders
- Rapid recruitment mechanisms also evolve to allow very large numbers of individuals to engage in battles
Lanchester’s square law of combat - what war does it describe
describes a “war of attrition”
Lanchester’s linear law of combat - what war does it describe
describes series of “gladiator duels”
threat vs combat - In competitive wars of attrition what should evolve and what does it establish?
threat displays evolve to establish which colony is bigger, and so who would win if a fight was started.
threat vs combat - desert honeypot ants
- they “measure” themselves against each other in threat displays.
- If one colony realizes it is smaller, it deescalates hostility.
- bigger colonies typically have larger ant sizes
- Fighting will ensue if ritualized displays determine the sides are evenly matched.
Combat and coordinated defense of resources - How might the spatial context of the resources shift the outcome of competition?
- Open foraging arena favors numerical superiority and not size…and adaptations to disrupt the competitive context.
- Localized resources favor early domination of resources and subsequent defense