SOCIAL:AGGRESSION AND PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOUR Flashcards

1
Q

Kin selection

A

organisms are most likely to help other whom they share the most genes, namely their offspring and genetic relatives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

reciprocal altruism

A

helping others increases the odds that they will help up or our kin in return, enhancing. the survival chances of our genes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

social learning

norm of reciprocity

A

reciprocate when others treat us kindly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

social learning

norm of social responsibility

A

help others and contribute to the welfare of society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

cultural differences

A

obligation vs choice - simpatia countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

parents effect of prosocial behaviour

A

those who:

  • have high morals
  • are warm and supportive
  • encourage empathy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

altruism

A

unselfishness or helping others only to enhance their welfare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

egoistic goals

A

helping others to improve own welfare to increase self esteem, avoid guilt for not helping, obtain praise or alleviate stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

empathy-altruism hypothesis

A

altruism is produced by empathy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

when do people help? situational factors

A
  • not being in a hurry
  • recently observing a prosocial model
  • being in a good mood
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

diffusion of responsibility

A

belief that someone else will help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

social comparison

A

look to see how others are responding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

bystander effect/apathy

A

presence of multiple bystanders inhibits each person’s tendency to help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

three factors more likely to receive help

A
  1. similarity: attitudes or nationality
  2. gender: male more likely to help woman than man. Women are equally as likely to help.
  3. perceived fairness and responsibility: more likely to help a person not responsible for their misfortune
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

three methods to increase prosocial behaviour

A
  • expose to prosocial models
  • developing feelings of empathy and connectedness
  • learning about factors effecting intervention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

defining aggression (3 aspects)

A
  1. intention to harm: underlying motivation to harm or injure another person
  2. awareness of adverse effects: behaviour can cause harm or injury
  3. harmful actions that target wants to avoid: not performed at targets request
17
Q

methods of measuring aggression

A
  • observation
  • self reports
  • peer nominations
  • archival data
18
Q

tasks for measuring aggression

A
  • electric shock
  • loud noise
  • cold water
  • unpleasant hot spicy sauce
19
Q

frustration-aggression hypothesis

A

all aggression comes from frustration (=blockage of Olga directed activity)

20
Q

displaced aggression

A

take out on someone else

21
Q

cue arousal theory
2 pathways
(social and sport)

A

frustration-interviening variables-agression (social situations)
OR
frustration- state of emotional arousal= anger- readiness for behaviour (sports)

22
Q

aggressive cues

A

enhanced possibility of aggressive behaviour through the situation increasing accessibility of aggressive cognitions

23
Q

weapons effect

A

more aggressive behaviour in frustration participants in the presence of weapons

24
Q

cognitive neo-associationist model

A

frustration activates a network of aggression-related thoughts and feelings
-can be automatic or controlled

25
Q

cognitive neo-associationist model :

automatic appraisal process

A
  • little or no conscious awareness

- unspecific negative feelings = fight or flight

26
Q

cognitive neo-associationist model :

controlled appraisal process

A
  • cognitive processing such as anger or fear
  • evaluation of potential outcomes, memories of similar experiences, social norms about appropriate emotion
  • more specific state: anger or fear
27
Q

excitation transfer theory

A

residual arousal from precious situation can transfer to or be added to arousal elicited in a new situation

28
Q

socail learning theory

A

aggression is a result of reinforcement either direct or indirect

29
Q

situational influence on agression

A
  • media
  • alcohol
  • crowding
  • noise
  • high temperature
30
Q

alcohol myopia

A
  • prevents thorough processing of situational behaviour
  • only paying attention to client features of situation
  • impairs awareness of social norms
  • more responsive to aggressive cues in the situation
31
Q

attentional Hypothesis

A

narrow view when evaluating a situation