Research Methods Flashcards
Practical Issues of methods [3]
- Time
- Money
- Access
Ethical Issues of methods [3]
- Informed consent
- Confidentiality
- Psychological harm
Theoretical issues of methods [3]
- Reliability
- Representativeness
- Validity
P.E.R.V.E.R.T Structure
Practical Issues Ethical Issues Reliability Validity Examples - actual studies (1 per method) Representative Theory
Laboratory Experiments
Takes place in highly controlled environment using scientific experiments.
Practical: Very expensive, participants may have to be compensated
Ethical: Have to maintain consent & lack of informed consent may cause harm
Theoretical: May cause Hawthorne effect due to controlled environment.
Field Experiments
Experiments that take place in real-life settings.
Practical: Access may be problem e.g. schools, but relatively inexpensive
Ethical: Reaching consent may be difficult as unaware of experiment
Theoretical: Higher in external validity (more natural behaviour)
Questionnaires
Research method consists of a list of pre-set questions
Practical: Easily distributed & cover large sample size.
Ethical: Attempting to interpret written questionnaire may be difficult, hard to achieve verstehen
Theoretical: If used w/ large samples it’s more likely to be representative
Structured Interviews
Interviews using pre-set questions, usually have structured responses
Practical: High response rate & training interviewers easy + cheap
Ethical: Hard to comfort vulnerable students in group interviews, may be uncomfortable
Theoretical: less valid as interviewer has to keep with same line of questionning
Unstructured Interviews
Interviews without pre-set questions or answers
Practical: Requires a skilled interviewer to ask correct questions
Ethical: Easy to develop a rapport with interviewee due to feeling ‘natural’
Theoretical: Not easily repeated, cannot ask same questions
Participant Observation
Where researcher joins in with the group being studied & observes their behaviour
Practical: Issues of getting into/staying/leaving the group
Ethical: Difficulty ensuring anonymity of participants & maintaining consent
Theoretical: Groups are observed in a natural environment
Non Participant Observation
Where the observer avoids any direct involvement with the research group
Practical: Not representative, small-scale sample.
Ethical: Hard to obtain consent, may cause Hawthorne effect if aware being observed
Theoretical: Limited risk of researcher ‘going native’ compared to participant observations
Official Statistics
Quantitative data collected by government bodies
Practical: Cheap & easy to access, e.g. via ONS website
Ethical: Some statistics may not be in public access
Theoretical: ONS cover large groups of people, e.g. crime statistics cover whole country
Documents
Secondary data mainly containing qualitative data that expresses beliefs & meanings held by an individual/organisation
Practical: Save researchers time but may be hard to access
Ethical: Personal documents may require consent, especially children’s
Theoretical: Personal bias is likely to be present in personal documents, may not be representative
Topics of methods in context [4]
- Gender/ethnic/class differences in achievement
- Parents’ attitudes towards school
- Completion of homework
- Labelling in classrooms
Themes of methods in context [5]
- Pupils
- Teachers
- Parents
- Schools
- Classrooms