practical investigation Flashcards

1
Q

practical report title

A

an observational research to investigate the differences of safe and unsafe behaviour between adults behaviour with and without children when crossing the road

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

why is this practical investigation useful?

A
  1. road safety skills are essential for children to learn
  2. requires complex skills: judgement, processing info, predicting actions of others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what did the department for transport in England and Wales estimate?

A

that during 2020, 1 child died per week and 10, 457 were injured whilst crossing the road

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what could be the reason for the statistic from transport

A

they are more impulsive and there brains are still developing risk awareness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the practical investigation linked to?

A

bandura’s social learning theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How may social learning theory and children learning to cross the road safely link

hint: scenario

A
  1. A parent walking with a child in the street may MODEL safe ways of crossing (explicitly demonstrating ‘stop’ and ‘look’)
  2. child IDENTIFIES with the adults as they see them as a ROLE MODEL
  3. They observe and note the safe road crossing behaviours
  4. Display their learning through imitation of this behaviour later
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

which researcher starting with M supported crossing road behaviour and the link to SLT

A

MUIR et al
77% of adults surveyed felt that they were their child’s primary learning source for road safety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

when adults are teaching their child new things, what other learning theory may this link to

A

operant conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is a scenario with road safety that links to operant conditioning

A
  1. a reinforcer increases the probability of a behaviour being repeated- verbally praising a child for crossing safely
  2. a punishment is something unpleasant to stop a behaviour- if a child went to run across the road a parent may shout, so the child knows they are in trouble
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what happens when adults are not in the company of children when crossing the road

A

they take more risks when crossing as they are not trying to model good behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

aim

A

the am of this naturalistic observation is to investigate the difference in behaviour of adults with and without children when crossing the road

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what two types of behaviour sampling techniques were used in this investigation

A

event sampling (quantitative)
continuous sampling (qualitative)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the hypothesis for this investigation

A

there will be a significant difference between number of adults crossing the road with and without children and the number of safe versus unsafe behaviours they display (operationalised by the highway code)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was some of the method

A

consists of both men and women with children in Reigate town at 1 o’clock

we used a data sheet, phone and pens

it was a naturalistic observation to see if there are any differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what sampling method was it

A

opportunity sampling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what statistical test was used to analyse the data

A

chi square

17
Q

how do we know to use chi-square

A
  • difference
  • nominal
    -unrelated
18
Q

how many safe crossing behaviours were there will children or w.o children

A

w children- 10
w.o children- 5

19
Q

how many unsafe crossing behaviours were there with children or w.o children

A

w children- 7
w.o children- 18

20
Q

what were the results of the chi-square

A

x^2 = 5.74

21
Q

were the results significant

A

yes

22
Q

what were some behaviours seen with children

A

waited for green man
glanced up
held hand
interact with child

23
Q

what were some behaviours seen without children

A

on phone
ran across the road
did not wait for green man

24
Q

what qualitative method was used to analyse data

A

thematic analysis

25
Q

what were some themes

A

following green cross code
instructing children
distracted behaviour

26
Q

what were some conclusions from thematic analysis

A

adults WITH children follow guidelines and show cautious behaviour

adults WITH OUT children, don’t follow green cross code as they are impatient

27
Q

2 strengths

A
  1. high in reliability, standardised procedures such as only taking note when the behaviour occurred as well as staying in the same place
  2. High in ecological validity,
    covert in a naturalistic environment, took note of behaviour at traffic lights
28
Q

2 weaknesses

A
  1. low in validity- might not have enough time to note all behaviour down, due to human observers, so cameras may have been better
  2. ethical concerns-
    people do not know they are being observed and did not gain informed consent
    BUT
    people are expected to be observed in pubic BPS
29
Q

what are two improvements that can be made

A

to increase the ethical standards of the study
gain informed consent

increase the validity by using cameras