Pilliavin et al (1969) Good Samaritanism Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Background to the study

A

After the Kitty Genovese Murder, researchers questioned why, despite her cries for help, onlookers failed to intervene.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Aim of the study

A

To investigate helping behaviour in a natural environment and to understand the conditions in which people are more likely to help

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Procedure of the study

A

In a covert observation 4 groups of 4 students from Columbia University were used to run trials to observe what would happen if a victim collapsed on the train. Each group was made of 2 girls and boys. One male was the victim whereas the other was a model passenger helping the victim and the 2 girls observed. The victim collapsed on the floor around the central handrail, near the model passenger. This became known as the critical area. Over 103 trials, the victim either appeared drunk or was holding a cane; and was either white or black.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Results of the study

A

In 62/65 trials where victim was holding a cane, they were helped before the model passenger stepped in. However, this was only 19/38 with the seemingly drunk victim. In 81/103 trials the victim was helped before the model passenger stepped in and in 60% of trials, more than 1 passenger came. 90% of first helpers were male.64% of the first people to help was white. 68% of white helpers came to the aid of white victims compared to 50% for black victims. Shows a tendency for same race helping.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Conclusion of the study

A

People are more likely to help someone perceived as ill compared to drunk (cost of helping). Men are more likely to help than women (cost of helping). There is a small tendency for same race helping. Larger groups are more likely to help than smaller groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Strengths of the study

A

The study was done in a natural environment, so it is ecologically valid as passengers acted naturally

As participants were not aware, they could not show demand characteristics which would have ruined the study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Weaknesses of the study

A

The passengers were unaware and that they were a part of the experiment, so they didn’t give consent; unethical

The situation could have caused distress to the passenger as it was an upsetting situation; unethical

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly