PAPER 3 - SCHIZOPHRENIA - drug therapy Flashcards
what are antipsychotic drugs?
drugs used to reduce symptoms of schizophrenia
what are atypical antipsychotics?
- carry a low risk of extra pyrimidal side effects
- have beneficial effect on negative symptoms and cognitive impairment
- suitable for treatment-resistant patients
- e.g. clozapine, resperadine
what are typical antipsychotics?
- dopamine antagonists as they bind to DA receptors but do not stimulate dopamine receptors so reduce symptoms of SZ e.g chlorpromazine
how are antipsychotic drugs used to treat psychosis?
- may be used in short or long term
- used to treat people who experience a loss of contact with reality e.g. through hallucinations/delusions
what are antagonists?
chemicals that reduce action of a neurotransmitter (e.g. dopamine)
how do typical antipsychotics work?
- acts as an antagonist in the dopamine system, so dopamine antagonists work by blocking dopamine receptors in the synapses of the brain
- dopamine may build up at the start of the drug therapy, but then production is reduced which reduces symptoms
what is the sedation effect?
- an effect of chlorpromazine
- sedative effects are thought to be due to its effect on histamine receptors
- chlorpromazine often used for its calming effects on other conditions and may be used on first admittance to hospital when patients are very anxious
what suuporting evidence for effectiveness of antipsychotics is there?
- supports effectiveness - lots of evidence
- a researcher reviewed studies comparing the effects of chlorpromazine to control conditions
- data from 13 trials, and total of 1121 participants showed chlorpromazine was associated with better overall functioning and reduced symptom severity compared to placebo
- there is also evidence for benefits of atypical antipsychotics
- researchers found clozapine more effective than typical antipsychotics (effective in 30-50% of treatment-resistant cases where typical antipsychotics have failed
what criticising evidence is there for the effectiveness of antipsychotics?
- researchers found serious flaws with evidence for effectiveness
- most studies are short term effects only and some successful trials have had their data published multiple times, emphasising the size of the evidence base for positive effects
- antipsychotics have powerful calming effects, its easy to demonstrate that they have some positive effects on on people with SZ - this is not the same as saying they really reduce severity of psychosis
how is “serious side effects” a limitation for antipsychotics?
- negative side effects include: gaining weight, dizziness, agitation, stiff jaw, sleepiness, and itchy skin
- long term use can result in tardive dyskinesia, caused by dopamine supersensitivity and causes involuntary facial movements
- most serious side effect is neuroleptic malignant syndrome (when the drug blocks dopamine action in hypothalamus) and can result in delirium and coma, and can be fatal
- frequencies range from less than 0.1% to just over 2%
how is “mechanisms unclear” a limitation for antipsychotics?
- we dont know why they work
- understanding is strongly ties up with original dopamine hypothesis (the idea that symptoms of SZ are linked to high levels of dopamine activity in the sub-cortex of the brain
- however we now know the original DA hypothesis is not complete, and that levels of dopamine in other parts of the brain are too low, this means antipsychotics shouldn’t work
- adds to argument of effectiveness
why might people think antipsychotics are unethical?
- its believed that antipsychotics are used in hospitals to calm SZ patients to make it easier for the staff rather than benefits to the patients themselves
- HOWEVER, calming distressed people with hallucinations and delusions almost certainly makes them feel better and allows them to engage with other treatments (e.g. CBT) and services 9e.g. meeting with social worker)