oct 7 Flashcards
define cognitive dissonance
the uncomfortable tension that arises when one is simultaneously aware of two conflicting cognitions
- can explain how behaviour can actually lead to attitude change (opposite from what we usually expect)
- we are motivated to change something in order to make that tension go away
how can you get rid of a dissonance
- changing one of your thoughts
- disproving current evidence
- add another cognition
which method to get rid of dissonance works the best
- they all work well but we typically chose the easiest thing we can change
is it harder to change behaviours or attitudes?
attitudes
what is our external justification?
explanation for counterattitudinal behaviour that lies outside the individual
- dissonance reduction most likely with minimal external justification
define a forced compliance paradigm
getting people to do something they don’t want to do
- very little external incentive
high external justification vs low external justification
- no dissonance vs dissonance
persuasion
change a private attitude or belief as a result of receiving a message
3 models of attitude change
1) cognitive dissonance
2) sequential request strategy
cognitive dissonance
attitude change results from drive to reduce cognitive dissonance by reducing attitude-behaviour inconsistency
sequential request strategy
“foot-in-door” technique
- first make a small request, get them to agree, once agreed then ask for a larger request
- you always only wanted the larger request, but asking the smaller request first makes them more likely to agree to the larger request
why does the sequential request strategy work?
- self-perception
- cognitive dissonance
low balling
request -> agreement -> hidden cost revealed
- person secures agreement with a request and then requester increases the size of that request by revealing hidden costs
door-in-the-face
make large request -> rejected
- > much more reasonable request
- the person begins with a large and unreasonable request that will be rejected; then follows that up with a more moderate request
elaboration likelihood model
- two ways in which persuasive messages can cause attitude change: central or peripheral