Melanoma Flashcards
Newman et al. 2012. C-kit expression in canine mucosal melanomas
14 benign dermal and 61 malignant mucosal melanocytic tumors examined for c-kit
Melan-A expression?
C-kit expression?
What was associated with longer survival?
c-kit may be altered in canine melanoma and may have potential as prognostic indicator
100% of dermal melanocytes and in 97% in tumors from oral or conjunctival mucosa - confirming melanocytic origin
Stong and diffuse in cytoplasm in 100% dermal melanocytes and in basilar mucosal melanocytes over submucosal neoplasms (44%), junctional (neoplastic) melanocytes (28%) and less commonly neoplastic melanocytes of subepithelial tumors (10%)
Kit expression in resected melanoma
Phillips et al. 2012. Evaluation of tyrosinase kinase expression in canine and equine melanocytic tumors
39 canine and 8 equine tumor samples and 10 canine and 6 equine normal tissue samples
Tyrosinase expression in melanocytic tumors compared to normal tissues?
Tyrosinase expression in histologic variants of melanocytic tumors
Correlation between MHC I and tyrosinase expression or tissue histologic classification
High expression
No significant difference
No correlation
Cuitino et al. 2012. Lack of prognostic significance of angiogenesis in canine melanocytic tumors
36 cutaneous melanomas (benign MT), 40 cutaneous melanomas (malignant MTs) and 43 oral melanomas
Mean MVD?
Mean EA?
MVD and EA related to survival?
Tumor vascularization higher in melanomas than melanocytomas but no prognostic significance
Highest in oral melanomas
High in cutanoeus melanoma and oral melanoma
Not related to survival for cutaneous and oral MT
Dank et al. 2014. Use of adjuvant carboplatin for treatment of dogs with oral malignant melanoma following surgical excision
Median PFS
First PFS event?
Median OS?
Tumor as cause of death?
259 days (8.6 mo)
Local recurrence 41% and metastasis 41%
440 days (14.7 mo)
60%
Han et al. 2013. Alteration in E-cadherin/B-catenin expression in canine melanotic tumors
42 primary canine skin and oral melanomas
B-catenin encoded by ctnnb1 gene - altered expression has been implicated in tumor progression
Expression of ctnnb1in oral melanoma compared to normal melanocytes
Expression of E-cad/B-catenin?
Intranuclear B-catenin?
Disruption of E-cad/B-catenin complexes and increased B-catenin may induce tumor progression and malignancy
Higher
Loss of membrance complex and cytoplasmic accumulation in 84%
Detected in all tissues with reduced membrane B-catenin expression
Chon et al. 2013. Activation of the canonical Wnt/B-catenin signaling pathway is rare in canine malignat melanoma tissue and cell lines
Canonical Wnt/B-catenin pathway activation is a ____ event in canine oral malignant melanoma tissue and canine malignant cell lines
Rare
Wilson-Robles HM. 2015. Identification and evaluation of putative tumor-initiating cells in canine malignant melanoma cell lines
TIC were identified in 2 cell lines - CML 1 and CML6M
CD34- cells expressed stem cell genes, such as Oct4, Nanog, Ptch1- more efficient at making spheres than CD34+ population
Noguchi et al. 2013. MicroRNAs as tumor suppressors in canine and human melanoma cells and as a prognostic factor in canine melanomas
Which microRNA was significantly associated with shorter survival time?
Which 2 microRNA were downregulated in canine and human MM cell lines?
Ectopic expression of ____ has significant inhibitory effect on cell growth by targeting ____
miR-203 is new prognostic factor and miR-205 functions as tumor suppressor by targeting erbb3
miR-203
miR-203 and miR-205
miR-205, erbb3
Campagne et al. 2013. Canine melanoma diagnosis: RACK1 as a potential biological marker
RACK1 in classification of 19 cutaneous and 5 mucosal melanocytic neoplasms
MITF as marker of normal and transformed melanocytic cells in dog tissues
All control and tumoral samples stained positive for MITF
RACK1 was not detected in healthy skin melanocytes, melanocytic lesion were positive for RACK1 (100%)
All melanomas stained homogeneously for RACK1
All melanocytomas stained heterogeneously for RACK1
Fowles et al. 2015. Comparative analysis of MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathway activation and inhibition in human and canine melanoma
Constitutive pathway activation and similar sensitiviy to AZD6244 (MAPK) and rapamycin (PI3K/AKT) was observed in human and canine cells
Choisunirachon et al. 2015. Effects of low-dose cyclophosphamide with piroxicam on tumor neovascularization in a canine oral malignant melanoma-xenografted mouse model
After tx with CyLD, px, or combination, growth of tumor was significantly ___ compared to control group at 30 days of treatment
Proliferation index was significantly ___ by all tretament
Which tx reduced MVD and VEGF levels
Which tx reduced proportion of normal vessels and caused an imbalance between VEGF and thrombospondin-1?
Suppressed
reduced
Cyclophosphamide only
Cyclophosphamide only
Ottnod et al. 2013. A retrospective analysis of the efficacy of Oncept vaccine for the adjunct treatment of canine oral malignant melanoma
OMM that had achived loco-regional cancer control
30 dogs with stage II and III disease
Dogs that received the vaccine did not achieve greated PFS, DFI or MST than dogs thay did not receive the vaccine
Greene et al. 2013. Expression of leptin and iNOS in oral melanoma in dogs
Melanomas in humans is promoted by inflammatory environment that is contributed by leptin and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS)
20 dogs
Leptin was detected in ___ of tumor cells from 11 dogs
Leptin expression was variable
OM with ___ percentage of iNOS positive cells displayed highest MI
>75%
Lowest
Ito et al. 2013. The proteosome inhibitor bortezomib inhibits growth if canine malignant melanoma cells in vitro and in vivo
Bortezomib suppresses the constitutively activated ___ pathway
NF-KB
Ahn Jo et al. 2013. Anti-tumor effect of adipose tissue derived-mesunchymal stem cells (AT-MSCs) expressing interferon-B and treatment with cisplatin in xenograft mouse model for canine melanoma
AT-MSCs cell therapy vehicles for anti-tumor molecules
IFN-B transduced canine AT-MSC (cAT-MSC-IFN-B) inhibited growth of LMeC canine melanoma cells
cAT-MSC-IFN-B and low-dose cisplatin reduced tumor volume compared with other treatment groups
Malho et al. 2013. Investigation of prognostic indicators for human uveal melanoma as biomarkers of canine uveal melanoma metastasis
Which genes demonstrated increased expression in metastasizing uveal melanoma?
HTR2B, FXR1, LTA4H, and CDH1
Seo et al. 2014. Antitumor effects of celocoxib in COX-2 expressing and non-expressing canine melanoma cell lines
Celecoxib selective COX-2 inhbitor inhibits cell growth of various human cancers such as MM
Celecoxib has antitumor effects in canine melanoma LMeC and CMeC-1 cells by inducing ___ cell cycle arrest and apoptosis
G1-S cycle
Borrego et al. 2016. Neurokinin-1 receptor expression and antagonism by NK-1R antagonist maropitant in canine melanoma cell lines and primary tumor tissues
NK-1R mRNA and protein expression were observed in majority of tumor tissues
NK-1R immunoreactivity in 11 of 15 tumors
Unable to find cell line to recapitulate effect
Maropitant inhibited proliferation and enahanced apoptosis in cell lines, in absence of NK-1R expression may represent off target effects
Riccardo et el. 2014. CSPG4-specific immunity and survival prolongation in dogs with oral malignant melanoma immunized with human CSPG4 DNA
Dogs with stage II-III surgically resected CSPG4-positive oral MM subjected to IM plasmid administration
hCSPG4 electrovaccination resulted in longer overall and disease-free survival times in 14 vaccinated dogs as compared to nonvaccinated controls
All dogs developed Abs
7 vaccinated dogs were tested for T-cell response and 2 had IFNg response
Breit et al. 2014. Biologic activity of the novel orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of nuclear transport (SINE) KPT-335 against canine melanoma cell lines
Exportin 1 (XPO1) is chaperone protein - export proteins out of nucleus
Upregulated in human cancers and linked to chemoresistance
Characterize biologic activity of SINE, KPT-335, against canine melanoma cell lines
Effect of KP-335 on cell lines?
Effect on XPO1?
Inhibited proliferation, blocked colony formation, induced apoptosis
Downregulated while increasing mRNA, upregulated p53 and p21
Boston et al. 2014. Efficacy of systemic adjuvant therapies administered to dogs after excision of oral malignant melanoma: 151 cases
151 OMM treated by excision with or without adjuvant therapies
MST?
Multivariable analysis, poor prognostic indicators?
Survival benefit from adjuvant therapy including vaccination against melanoma or chemotherapy?
Difference in survival time for dogs that received adjuvant therapy?
346 days (1 year)
Tumor size, patient age, intralesional excision (vs. marginal, wide, radical excision)
None
No difference in survival - 335 days for that did and 352 for those that did not
Chon et al. 2015. 6-Bromoindirubin-3’oxime (BIO) decreases proliferation and migration of canine melanoma cell lines
BIO is a serine/threonine kinase inhibitor with specificty for GSK-3B inhibition
BIO treatment of melanoma cell lines enahanced B-catenin mediated transcriptional activity, suggesting GSK-3B inhibition, reduced cell proliferation and migration
Guth et al. 2014. Comparison of cancer stem cell antigen expression by tumor cell lines and by tumor biopsies from dogs with melanoma and OSA
What CSC antigens were expresses in cell line?
Markers expressed in tumor biopsy samples?
CSC subpopulations are similar in melanoma and OSA
CD44 and CD90
CD133, CD34, CD44, CD24, Oct3/4
Noguchi et al. 2016. Analysis of micR-203 in CREB/MITF/RAB27a pathway: comparison between canine and human melanoma cells
miR-203 is downregulated and acts an anti-oncomir in melanoma cells
miR-203 directly targets CREB1 and regulated its downstream targets, MITF and RAB27a
miR-203 suppressed growth of humand and canine melanoma cells and inhibited melanosome transport through suppression of signaling pathway
Cancedda et al. 2016. Efficacy and side effects of radiation therapy in comparison with radiation therapy and temozolomide in the treatment of measurable canine malignant melanoma
Adjuvant oral tem (60 mg/m2 for 5 days every 28 days)
15 dogs treated with RT only (group 1) and 12 dogs received tem (group 2)
Overall response rate of group 1 and group 2?
Median time to progression in group 1 and 2?
Survival time?
Post-radiation tem has good safety profile and may improve TTP in MM
87% and 81% - no difference
110 days (3.7 mo) and 205 (6.8 mo) days significantly longer in group 2 than group 1
No difference