Lecture 3: Response, Potency and Efficacy Flashcards

1
Q

Agonist

A

-bind to receptor site
-enhanced cellular activity
-induced fit that activates receptor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Antagonist

A

-binds to and blocks receptor site
-blocks natural chemical from binding to receptor
-induced fit that does NOT activate receptor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Potency

A

-dose of drug required to produce particular effect of given intensity
-comparison based on doses that produce SAME effect (usually ED50)
-may be overrated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

High potency

A

entire curve shifted left towards lower x values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

low potency

A

entire curve shifted right to higher x values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Efficacy

A

-response resulting from DR interaction
-limited by toxicity
-more important than potency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Strong agonist

A

high affinity and high efficacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Higher efficacy

A

curve reaches closer to 100%
-higher y value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

lower efficacy

A

lower y value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Partial Agonist

A

-produce reduced response even at full occupancy
-cannot produce same maximal effect as full agonist
-may competitively inhibit response to full agonist
-related to drug binding. to inactive form of receptor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Partial agonist examples

A

-aripiprazole, D2
-buprenorphine, mu opiate
-buspirone, 5-HT1A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

partial agonist structural basis

A

resembles a shape between agonist and antagonist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Partial Agonist theory

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Level of response

A

full agonist > partial agonist > inactive compound > inverse agonist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Heroin Methadone example

A

-Buprehorphine (partial agonist) binds all receptors and provides about half effect of heroin as treatment for opiod addiction = nowhere for heroin to bind so no withdrawal
-Naloxone (antagonist) blocks all receptors but with no effect = no euphoria = withdrawal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Full agonist structure

A

-fits neatly
-loop c closes in

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Partial agonist structure

A

-a bit bigger, sticks out
-loop c can close but not all the way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Antagonist structure

A

-bigger, sticks out of receptor
-loop c cannot close

19
Q

Inactive to active form

A

Lecture 4 recording

20
Q

As partial agonist concentration increases

A

more occupancy of receptors
-undos full agonist binding?? idk

21
Q

as full agonist concentration increases

A

less occupancy of receptors

22
Q

Increase partial concentration

A

decrease overall response

23
Q

Assumption: adding enough partial agonist or antagonist

A

displaces full agonist

25
Inverse agonist
-requires constitutive activity (otherwise it's just an antagonist) -opposite response of agonist -inactivates receptor? -full or partial -response can be altered by agonist, partial agonist, antagonist (shared binding site) -stabilize inactive form of receptor -ex: rimonobant (acomplia)-CB1 receptors
26
Inactive receptor + agonist
conformational change of receptor and interaction with G proteins
27
active conformation of receptor w/o agonist + inverse agonist
inactive receptor no interaction with G proteins
28
Rimonobant (acomplia)
-inverse agonist -binds to cannaboid (CB1)receptors -reduced hunger, increased anxiety -oops she never made it to the market
29
activation of CB1 receptors
-THC bind -decreased anxiety, hunger, relaxation
30
constitutive activity
REQUIRED for inverse agonists -active form of receptor
31
constitutive activity absent
same as antagonist
32
constitutive activity present
-inverse agonist lower than antagonist curve -backward s curve
33
Endogenous agonist present
silent antagonist has backward s curve
34
endogenous agonist. absent
silent antagonist straight line
35
constitiutive absent, endogenous agonist absent
no effect from either -straight horizontal line on top
36
constitutive activity, NO endogenous agonist
-silent antagonist no effect -inverse agonist has effect
37
NO constitutive activity, endogenous agonist present
-both have same effect
38
Constitutive activity and endogenous agonist present
-both have effect -inverse agonist has better effect
39
Receptor Antagonism
-DR interaction that interfres with or prevents the development of drug response by agonist -competitive, noncompetitive, irreversible
40
Competitive Antagonism
-competing for active site -reversible by increasing dose -increase concentration shifts curve right
41
Log dose-response curve of AGONIST in presence of competitive antagonist
-shifts right -reduction in effective potency of agonist -need more agonist
42
Schild plot
-ability to calculate KD of ligand to generate P2 value
43
Binding affinity generally correlates with
the potency of antagonists
44