Lecture 12 Flashcards
Symbols = s__ for representing our t__, f__, and k__ and for c__ them to other people.
Concepts = general i__ or u__ used to group together o__, e__, q__, or a__ in some way.
systems, thoughts, feelings, knowledge, communicating
ideas, understandings, objects, events, qualities, or abstractions
Symbol-Based Reasoning
-scale model task (DeLoache)
(Find snoopy in the real life room based on where he’s hidden in the model).
_ yrs: succeed
. yrs: fail
picture task: __ succeed
Why the difference between pictures and models?
-Problem with dual representation: seeing the model as both a r__, i__ object and as a s__ for somethings other than itself. (NOT 3-D reasoning issue).
“enlarging machine” study (DeLoache, Miller, Rosengren)
made children believe model=room
Results?
Conclude: young children’s original performance stems from difficulty with d__ r__!
3, 2.5
both
real, interesting, symbol
dual representation
Symbolic Development: Practical Concerns
Anatomically detailed dolls were once the standard for use when interviewing children about sexual abuse, BUT
-Children younger than _ have trouble making connections between s__ and d__.
Use of manipulatives (concrete objects) in mathematics education
-Manipulatives are i__ o__ and s__ (d__ r__)
5, self, doll
interesting objects, symbols
dual representation
Can infants detect similarities among objects?
- “cat & dog” experiment (Quinn & Eimas)
- Habituation/novelty method
3-4-month-olds
“cat” condition
-shown pairs of different cat pictures
“dog” condition
-shown pairs of different dog pictures
Test: one novel cat picture, one novel dog picture.
Results:
- “cat” condition => preferred __.
- “dog” condition => preferred __.
Conclude?
-Young infants capable of p__ c__ (grouping together objects with similar appearances.)
Also m__ vs. o__ a__.
Rely on p__ – e.g., wheels for vehicles
dog, cat
perceptual categorization
mammals, other animals
parts
Children’s earliest categories tend to be at the m__ or b__ level.
e.g.: tree (vs. plant or oak)
Basic-level categories have consistent c__ and i__ in these categories are easiest to distinguish from those in other categories.
Parents start at the basic level to teach children more g__ or more s__ categories.
medium, basic
characteristics, items
general, specific
Numerical equality = the realization that sets of N o__ have something in c__.
Are newborns sensitive to numerical equality?
Izard et al. (2009)
Heard sets of 4 or 12 syllables
Displays of 4 or 12 objects Newborns’ looking matched
How sensitive are they?
6 vs. 18 – __!
4 vs. 8 – __!
Discrimination becomes more precise during the __ year and __.
objects, common
yes
no
first, beyond
Infant arithmetic
-Addition & Subtraction (Wynn, 1992)
-Violation-of-expectation method
1+1 problem
Possible event: 1 + 1 = 2
Impossible event: 1 + 1 = 1 5-month-olds
Results:
I _ P
2-1 problem
Possible Event: 2 - 1 = 1
Impossible Event: 2 - 1 = 2
Results: I _ P
Conclude?
young infants have some a__ c__ abilities
>
approximate, counting
BUT…do Wynn’s studies really demonstrate that infants can do simple arithmetic?
Simon, Hespos, & Rochat (1995): “…there is a rather unavoidable confound in Wynn’s experiment whereby every outcome that is arithmetically incorrect is also p__ i__.”
Thus, infants may look longer because of violations of o__ knowledge.
Replicated Wynn’s original result
Two new conditions:
Impossible i__ (one object changes)
Impossible a__ and impossible id__.
Infants appear to look longer at the conditions that have a__ i__, supporting the notion that infants can do simple arithmetic.
physically, impossible
object
identity, arithmetic, identity
arithmetic impossibility
Children’s Counting
Begins ~age _, understanding l__.
What do preschoolers understand? 3 counting principles o_-o_ (each object gets only \_\_ label). s\_\_-o\_\_ (always count the same \_\_). c\_\_ (5\_\_5, 5\_\_6)
Supported by Puppet counting experiments (Gelman)
4-5 yr olds
puppet correct or violates principle
2, limited
one-one, one
stable-order, order
cardinal, =, does not equal
Cultural/language influences on counting
Chinese children learn to count __ than U.S.
Both use Arabic numerals (e.g., “3”), but Number names differ:
English: labels less p__, esp. “teens”
1-10: arbitrary
teens: mixed up
Chinese: more predictable
1-10: arbitrary
teens: tens + ones: 10-2, 10-3, 10-4…
faster
predictable