LEARNING APPROACH- Bandura (AGGRESSION) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the psychology being studied

A

The social learning theory- this believes we learn behaviour through imitation and observation. That people tend to learn behaviour in these steps:
1)Attention
2)Retention
3)Reproduction
4)Motivation- vicarious punishment (rewards)
Aggression- an act of hostility with the intention of harming someone.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

mention the 2 aims of the study

A

-overall to investigate observational learning of aggression
-To see whether a child would imitate aggressive behaviour if they witnessed such a behaviour from an adult

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the 4 predictions in the study that the aim was testing

A

> subjects exposed to the aggressive model would have higher aggressive behaviour than the latter group and control group
> subjects exposed to the N- aggressive model would be inhibited in their aggressive behaviour in comparison to the latter group
> tendency of same sex modelling each others behaviour
> boys should become more physically aggressive than girls

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

give 4 features of the sample and the sampling method used

A

-opportunity sampling
-72 children
-ages ranged from 3 years to 5 years
-were all selected from nursery school of Stanford University
- mean age was 52 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What were the 3 IVs made

A

-Aggressive/ Non aggressive
-the sex of the children
-same/ different sex models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

before the experiment started participants were rated based on

A

the extent to which the subjects displayed physical and verbal aggression towards inanimate objects as well as aggression inhibition. this was rated by teachers on a scale of 0-5 who were familiar to the children
They recorded high inter rater reliability of +0.89

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How was the precision of treatment comparisons increased

A

subjects were matched individually based on the ratings given of their aggressive behaviour and social interactions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how were the groups divided based on the gender of the model

A

there were 12 boys and girls and 12 girls and boys
AGGRESSIVE CONDITION:
-6 boys and girls saw female model
-6 girls and boys saw male model
NON AGGRESSIVE CONDITION:
-6 boys and girls saw female model
-6 girls and boys saw male model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe how a matched pairs design was used in the study

A
  • 51 children were matched based on their pre existing levels of aggression. With children with a similar level of aggression being matched in 3s
  • one of them was placed in the control group, one was in the N-aggressive condition and the other child was Aggressive condition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are weaknesses for matched pairs design

A

~time consuming
~lack of generalisability as subjects are more confined to their characteristics
~individual or confounding variables may play role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

describe what took place in Phase 1

A

1-Each child was brought in individually and in this room they stayed for 10 mins. They would play with the potato stickers at a corner. The adult sized bobo doll wand mallet were present
2-the first two conditions were introduced. The aggressive model would demonstrate aggressive behaviour to the bob doll while the N- aggressive model assembled toys
3- the control group was not exposed to a model

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did the N-aggressive model do in the 1st room

A

-They arranged a tinker set in a quiet manner and ignored the bobo doll

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what did the Aggressive model do in the 1st room

A

-they assembled the tinker set and after 1 min elapsed, they started being aggressive
Distinct behaviours were
>laying the bobo doll on its side
>they sat on bobo and punched it repeatedly on the nose
>they raised bobo and struck it on the head with a mallet
>they would throw bobo up in the air and kick it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

mention FOUR imitative verbal aggressive & 2 N- aggressive comments used by the aggressive model

A

AGGRESSIVE
“Sock him in the nose”
“throw him in the air”
“Kick him”
“POW”
N-AGGRESSIVE
“He sure is a tough fella”
“He keeps coming back for more”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

how was this proved to be a lab experiment for the children

A

Most children were under the impression that they were no longer in the school nursery grounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did the researcher arouse aggression to the children in Room 2

A
  • There were several attractive toys and the researcher waited until they got involved with the toys for 2 minutes
  • they then said that:
    “these are the very best toys and that they are for the other kids”
    and they should go play with the other toys in the next room
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

list 4 attractive toys in room 2

A

-locomotive
-jet fighter plane
-complete doll set
-baby crib

18
Q

list three aggressive toys in room 3 &
list 3 non aggressive toys

A

AGGRESSIVE
- 3ft Bobo doll
-mallet
-2 dart guns
-tether ball with a painted face
N-AGGRESSIVE
-Tea set
-crayons
-2 dolls
-colouring paper
-plastic farm animals

19
Q

how was the time split for each child in observations

A

They all stayed for 20 mins and in those 20 mins there were 5 second intervals through an electrical interval timer and in those intervals they observed a fixed behaviour

20
Q

what technique was used by researchers in the observation room to improve validity

A

Single blind technique

21
Q

How was inter Rater Reliability achieved

A

2 independent observers were used and data was compared to assess their inter rater reliability and it showed a correlation of 0.90

22
Q

what were the three measures of imitation

A

-imitative verbal
-imitative physical
-imitative non aggressive verbal

23
Q

mention any partial imitative behaviour shown

A

-Having the mallet strike other object other than the bobo doll
-sitting on the bobo doll but showing no aggression towards it

24
Q

Mention any non imitative verbal behaviour shown

A

“Shoot the bobo”
“Stupid ball”
“Horses fighting, biting”

25
Q

state 6 results shown

A

-Boys showed more imitative physical aggression than girls as well as more gun play
-no significant difference between boys and girls in verbal aggression however when model was female, girls showed more verbal aggression
-exposure to an aggressive model increases the probability of aggressive behaviour shown
-partial imitative aggression was shown more by the aggressive group in comparison to the other groups
-male model exerted a greater influence than the female model in Room 3
-No significant difference between N-aggressive and control group when exposed to the female model

26
Q

mention strengths shown in the study

A

-Standardised procedure hence test for reliability
-high controls e.g time watching model hence increases validity
-quantitative data was collected enabling clear comparisons
- the use of single blind technique

27
Q

how did the study show standardisation

A

+amount of time participants watched a model i.e 9 mins of aggression
+the layout of the room
+exposed to the same type of toys

28
Q

how was data collected

A
  • Through observations by a one way mirror by 2 covert observers
  • they were non-participants
  • they used a behavioural category list
29
Q

mention 2 conclusions given by Bandura

A

-behaviour can be learned purely from imitation without any reinforcement and can be carried out in a different setting with the absense of the model
-bandura concluded the gender differences in results was due to culture expectations
- Aggressive behaviour from males are more likely to be imitated than aggression from females

30
Q

mention weaknesses shown in the study

A

-Quantitative data is reductionist
-the setup was artificial and lacked ecological validity e.g children were unfamiliar to the rooms
-lack of generalisability as children were selected from the same nursery

31
Q

mention a point for nurture

A

> Gender roles and expectations - girls played with dolls and boys played with the guns

32
Q

mention a point for nature

A

Boys should show more aggression than girls and this can. be due to hormone development and biological tendencies for males to be more physical than females

32
Q

How can this study be applied to everyday life

A

> > avoid certain television shows that may be aggressive to children and they should be watched at a certain age
by teaching desirable behaviours to children in the classroom with the use of positive reinforcement by modelling

33
Q

mention a point for both individual and situational explanation

A

individual- The children from the non aggressive condtion and contorl groups still showed aggressive behaviours and that could have been due to personality traits 2
Situational- the gender of the model was part of the situation as well as what type of model was present in the situation

34
Q

what is a strength for the use of children in the study

A

+children have been exposed to less violence than adults hence, there may be less extraneous variables affecting their aggression levels
+children are naive participants hence less likely to identify the aim at hand

35
Q

what were the ethical weaknesses of the study

A

-No informed consent
-No right to withdraw
-psychological/physical harm
- their school nursery was revealed

36
Q

For the background, what are 2 ways previous studies differed with Bandura

A
  • modelling the behaviour when the model is absent
  • presented delayed modelling instead of immediate imitation
37
Q

What are the quantitaitve results for physical imitative aggression

A

male model:
25.8- boys
7.2- girls
Female model:
12.4- boys
5.5- girls

38
Q

What are the quantitative results for verbal imitative aggression

A

Male model:
12.7-boys
2.3- girls
Female model:
2.0-boys
13.7- girls

39
Q

what refers to Aggressive gun play

A
  • shooting darts or aiming a gun and firing imaginary shots at objects
40
Q

what refers to Mallet aggression

A
  • Hitting the bobo doll aggressively with the mallet