Lab Test 1 (lab 1) Flashcards

1
Q

This is often used to evaluate performance

A

muscle strength

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Strength

A

the amount of force or tension a muscle or muscle groups can exert against a resistance in one maximal effort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Reasons to test strength 4

A

predict performance
implement a training program
measurement of rehabilitation
identify a muscle imbalance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Two reason to predict performance

A

comparison to normal values

use certain tests to estimate fiber type composition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

reason to test strength to implement a training program

A

periodization

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

two reasons to get a measurement of rehabilitation 2

A

post-trauma (surgery) muscle strength decreases: atrophy

stages of recovery based upon the muscle’s ability to produce force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Identifying a muscle imbalance is done doing this

A

agonist vs antagonist ratios

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

one reason to identify a muscle imbalance

A

comparison to norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

muscle imbalance: knee extension and knee flexion

A

quads/hamstring ratio

hamstring/quads ratio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

hamstrings are typically this percent as strong as the quads

A

65-75%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The strength difference in the hams vs the quads is due to

A

size of two muscle groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ideal ratio hams vs quads

A

65%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hamstrings should be at least this % as strong as quads to prevent injury

A

58%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

3 ways to measure muscle strength

A

Isometric
Isotonic
Isokinetic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A contraction (or muscle action) with tension, but there is no change in external muscle length. AKA static contraction (or muscle action)

A

Isometric

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A muscular contraction (or muscle action) in which a muscle shortens with varying tension while overcoming or lifting a constant resistance through the ROM (range of motion)

A

Isotonic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Maximal tension (force or torque) developed in all joint angles throughout the full ROM. Speed (or velocity) is constant (regardless of how much force is produced, the speed stays the same). There is accommodating resistance at a controlled speed of movement.

A

Isokinetic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

THis measure of muscular strength uses an accommodating resistance at a controlled speed of movement

A

isokinetic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

4 advantages to isometric testing

A

inexpensive (not much equipment needed)
time efficient
useful in rehabilitative settings
most facilities/people can do it

20
Q

4 disadvantages to isometric training

A

joint angle specific
does not reflect increase in strength across an entire ROM
strength values do not relate to a dynamic moment
there is no mathematical work done

21
Q

4 advantages to isotonic testing

A

better than an isometric muscle action
related to performance/athletics
psychological aspect of seeing the bar or stack move
relatively inexpensive

22
Q

3 disavantages to isotonic testing

A

measures the weakest point in the ROM
unable to measure strength at any controlled speed
trial-and-error method to attain max

23
Q

DCER

A

dynamic constant external resistance

24
Q

3 advantages of isokinetic testing

A

measures strength/force/torque at different joint angles
1-500 x s^-1
they are fancy

25
Q

2 disadvantages of isokinetic testing

A

expensive (>= $45000)

must know how to operate an isokinetic dynomometer (cant be computer illiterate)

26
Q

3 ways to express strength results

A

absolute terms
relative terms
strength / lean body weight

27
Q

A limited value in expression of strength results

A

absolute terms

28
Q

This is a strength-to-weight ratio. A relative value also allows for comparison between individuals

A

relative terms

29
Q

provides information regarding strength per unit of muscle mass

A

strength/lean body weight (LBW)

30
Q

2 points on absolute strength results

A

cannot compare different people with absolute strength or power values
units of foot pounds or newton meters

31
Q

formula for relative strength results

A

strength value (ft.lbs) / BW (lbs) = relative strength ratio

32
Q

converting ft.lbs to Nm

A

Strength value (ft.lbs) x 1.3588 = strength value in Nm

33
Q

Relative strength terms do this

A

takes into account variables

34
Q

Strength / lean body weight allows for this

A

gender comparisons

35
Q

The cybex II can be used to measure this

A

concentric flexion and extension for the lower and upper body

36
Q

The cybex II cannot be used to measure this

A

eccentric movements

37
Q

Isokinetic strength testing can measure peak force production at these joint angles.

A

various

38
Q

Isotonic strength testing can measure peak force here

A

at the weakest point in the range of motion

39
Q

This type of strength testing cannot measure the maximal force which can be produced by a muscle and speed of contraction cannot be predetermined

A

Isotonic

40
Q

Torque vs # of reps

A

negative slope

41
Q

torque vs ROM

A

Upside down U shaped slope

42
Q

Torque vs velocity

A

negative slope

43
Q

Torque vs time

A

Negative slope
sprinters have a faster drop off
Long distance runners have a slower drop off

44
Q

Peak strength relative to body weight =

A

Initial peak torque (ft.lbs) over weight (kg)

45
Q

% decline =

A

(initial peak torque - final peak torque) / initial peak torque all X 100%

46
Q

% fast twitch =

A

% decline - 5.2 all over 0.9