KA - 5 Social Learning Theory Flashcards
what is identification
attaching oneself to a model because they have qualities that you wish to possess
what is imitation
copying a behaviour
what is a model
any person who shows examples behaviour
what is modelling
imitating a behaviour that has been shown by a model who you have identified with
what is reinforcement
the consequences of behaviour being strengthened
what is vicarious learning
modelling a behavior that you have seen being reinforced because you want to receive the same reinforcement
what is nurture
behaviour is learned through environmental experience, it is not innate
what does SLT argue
- behaviour is learnt through observation
- falls on nurture side of nature/nurture debate
- takes cognitive mediating factors into consideration
which approaches is it influenced by
behaviourist and cognitive
what are the cognitive mediating factors
- attention
- retention
- motor reproduction
- motivation
strengths of SLT
- acknowledges the importance of cognitive factors
- can explain cultural differences in behaviour
- lots of research in a lab - high control
limitations of SLT
- Bandura’s Bobo Doll research underestimates the influence of biological factors
- suggests that behaviours that are not met with good outcomes will not be repeated but that is not always the case
- lab setting has low ecological validity
how did Bandura research social learning
Bobo Doll experiment
how did Bandura conduct the Bobo doll experiment
- 8 groups of 6 children matched on aggression levels from a questionnaire
- 1/4 saw same sex aggressive role models
- 1/4 saw opposite sex aggressive role model
- 1/4 saw same sex non-aggressive role model
- 1/4 saw opposite sex non-aggressive role model
- control group saw no model at all
what did the non aggressive role models do
played with cars, trucks, tea set, farm animals and crayons
what did the aggressive role models do
played with Bobo doll, mallet with peg board, dart guns and a tetherball
what were key observations of the experiment
- partial imitation of the models behaviour with the mallet, also sitting on the bobo doll was more common with aggressive
- aggressive conditions were more likely to display non-imitative aggression
- boys showed more physical imitative aggression, girls showed more verbal imitative aggression
- the male model had greater effect over behaviour
what was the conclusion of the Bobo doll experiment
if a child is exposed to an aggressive model, it is likely they would imitate their behaviours and boys were more likely to imitate the same-sex model
strengths of the Bobo doll experiment
- lab setting - easily replicable
- did not rely on a sole observer
- Bandura’s later research found similar findings meaning it is reliable
limitations of Bandura’s bobo dolls
- only studied the immediate impact of observing aggression
- Bobo doll was designed to be punched (demand characteristics)
- imitation could have been a result of obedience
- unethical and morally wrong (Wortman, Loftus and Weaver)