fieldwork - taunton town centre Flashcards

1
Q

what is the title of the fieldwork?

A

Exploring the success of the regeneration in Taunton Town centre

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

where is Taunton

A
  • Somerset - southwest of the uk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

benefits of Tauntons location

A
  • public toilets and car park located near area
  • had footpaths and safe crossings
  • recently undergone regerneration = approppiate for are theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

name 3 risks and ways to prevent them :

A
  1. slipping/tripping - wear suitable shoes, follow footpaths, dont run
  2. being runover - use crossings, follow footpaths
  3. getting lost - plan route, remin in groups [at least of 3]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what sampling method was used and why?

A

stratfied
- allowed us to identify sites which had undergone regeneration
- not possible to evaluate whole of Taunton in a day

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

explain the quantative method used?

A
  • measuered the enviromental quality w a score sheet that inclused 6 elements e.g green space, litter, noise pollution
  • w a licket scale between -5 & 5
  • at each site we would gove a score for each factor
    = max was 30
  • highest score = best enviromental quality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

explain a qualitive method you did?

A

EPITOME words
- at each site we each wrote down 3 words to decribe the area
- as a group we then created a ‘wordle’ - word bubble = to gather a general feeling about the area
- which we could then comppare to other years or locals opinions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

how did we present are data?

A
  • RADAR DIAGRAMS
  • present enviromental quality
  • ## allowed us to visually compare sites
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how accurate were the results ?

A
  • our site was large and we werent able to asess everywehere which may pf lead to in acurate results
  • time of day and season = will also impact are results
  • enviromental quality score was subjective
  • it was sunny day so there were less cars out and there was less traffic as we went after rush hour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

how reliable are the results

A
  • unsure what a ‘typical’ day is as we only collected data one 1 day
  • roadworks present at one site which could of impacted enviromental scores
  • subjective data
  • end of our data collection was at the end of a school day [may of added noise and enviromental scores]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

improvments?

A
  • data was very subjective = have more ppl asses reduces bias
  • pin poiny exact sites rather than big areas
  • return at other times of year
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

geographical theory?

A

regeneration
- overall enviromental, social, economic improvements of an area

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

hypothsis

A

regenerated areas = higher EN quality, stronger economy & socailly sucessfull

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

results

A
  • overall regerneration lead to positive EN scores
    = enviromently sucessfull
  • Station Boulavard = had the lowest EN quality maybe due to its busy nature = town centre [gentrificatyion also occured here]
  • impact of plannign was evident = regenerated areas across the city [pockets of expensive housing & higher QOL factors from the regeneration] [rather than jsut on the outskirts]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are the 3 enquiry questions?

A

areas that have regenrated will have..
1. a higher enviromental qualitty
2. stronger economy
3. socially sucessful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

secondary data?

A
  • google maps was used to plan routes & indentify sites [to research]
  • zoopla was used to see the chnage in house prices before & after regeneration [see if they had inc & gentrifaction occurered
  • census data = data shine website to compare regenerated areas to non regernerates areas
17
Q

analysis

A
  • compared are enviromental quality results to previous groups to take into account any anomlies & increase the sample size
18
Q

GIS

A

-used to locate total envirometnal quality scores on map [proportional symbols]
- visually see the enviromental change across the regernated areas
= asses which had the greatest sucess

19
Q

conclusion

A

we can conclude:
- areas where regerneration occured = postive enviromental quality
- particaly in Sommerset Sqaure and Castle Green
- near Station Boulevard [least effective place of regeneration evidence of gentrification e.g rising house prices etc

20
Q

evaluation

A
  • our conclusions were valid:
  • we used stratified sampling to reduce bias
  • for the EQ results to minimise subjectivty we compared w prior results we were able to inc reliabilty
  • secondary data helped us support our conclusion = more reliable