fieldwork - river holford Flashcards
what is the title of our physical fieldwork?
Exploring downstream changes along the River Holford
benefits of the location
- river had footpaths = safe and accesible
- accesible car park
- river showed obvious changes
name 2 risks and ways to prevent them:
- slipping/tripping - wear appropiate footwear, dont run
- drowning - avoid deep fast flowing water
whats the geographical theory?
BRADSHAW MODEL
- discharge increases downstream as tribatries join
- velocity increases as there is larger for veloicity of water = more energy & less friction as chanell widens and deepens
hypothesis
- discharge will increase as we move downstream
- velocity will increase as we move downstream
- cross section area will increase as we move downstream
what sampling method did we use?
stratified & some systamtic
- measuring after tributries and their safety
explain the qualitve method used?
- we used a field sketch/photo and annotated it to higlight key features e.g gradient, pebble size
explain quantative method
- cross sectional area
- we used a tape measure to measure the width of the wetted edges [stratfied]
- then divided the width by 10 and used a meter ruler to measure the depth at all 10 points [thin end faced up stream]
=sytematic
explain quantative method 2 [systematic]
- velocity
- at each site we measured the width w a tape measure and divided it by 3
- at each point used a** flow meter **and timed how long it took the impellor to reach the bottom
- then worked out the mean velocity from 3 readings
secondary data used ?
- geology maps to work out geology of area
- google maps = to identify safe acsess points
how did we present our data
- line graph
- ## plot discharge against distance downstream
how was GIS used
- to locate our velocity data onto a map = so we could visually see the change in velocity
what did our results show
as we travelled downstream the discharge, cross sectional area and velocity increased
how reliable were our results
- in fast flowing parts = hard to keep tape measure taut may have impacted reading
- identifying the wetted bank = subjective
- only took data from 1 day = so the wind direction and weather may of impacted results
what improvements could be made?
- larger sample size
- gone at different times of year
- use a dif technique for velocity w low flow