Exam 2 Deck 4 Flashcards

1
Q

One tries to prove a conclusion other than the one at issue.

A

Irrelevant Thesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Consciously diverting attention from the issue.

A

Red Herring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Misrepresents an opponent’s proposition so it’s easy to attack

A

Straw man argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

One advances a claim that can’t be disproved since any evidence whatsoever can be interpreted as being consistent with the claim.

A

Non-falsifiable claim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Certain beliefs or principles are assumed to be beyond dispute even to the point where they overrule observed facts.

A

Apriorism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A claim is supported by evidence having the same meaning as the claim or by evidence that provides no independent support.

A

Begging the question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

An achievable good is rejected for the sake of a best at is unlikely ever to be achieved

A

Unobtained perfection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

An arguer adopts a double standard favoring one side of the issue over its alternatives

A

Special pleading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

One improperly shifts the burden of proof by asserting that the inability to disprove one’s position must be taken as proof of its truth.

A

Appeal to Ignorance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Americans are constantly being urged to support government anti-poverty programs. But these efforts are misguided since man does not live by bread alone. Our greatest problems result from the spiritual poverty of our people. The crying need of our age is reform of the human heart.

A

Unobtained perfection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A mother to her child: Steven, I don’t care if you don’t like spinach. Don’t you know there are people starving all over the world.

A

Irrelevant Thesis, Red Hering

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How do I know he’s not guilty? Because he’s innocent, that’s why.

A

Begging the Question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The senator has said we should not deploy the proposed Star Wars anti-ballistic missile system. I disagree entirely. I cannot understand why he would want to leave us defenseless like that.

A

Straw Man Argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Television violence doesn’t do any harm. None of the surveys that have been conducted have ever proved that it does.

A

Appeal to Ignorance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The human soul is immortal, for not a shadow of a doubt exists that the noble spirit that animates the human clay will survive the catastrophe of death and continue to exist for all eternity.

A

Begging the Question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Capitalism has always left areas of poverty, hardship, and misallocated resources. Socialism, on the other hand, has never been properly tried.

A

Special pleading

17
Q

Despite all the hardships I’ve endured in my life–growing up poor, my debilitating illness, the death of my youngest child, and my husband’s infidelity–I know that everything happens for a reason.

A

Non-falsifiable claim

18
Q

I don’t care what your surveys show. You can’t tell me our product isn’t the highest quality in the market.

A

Apriorism

19
Q

An argument against a bond measure: We admit that this measure is popular. But there are so many bond issues on this ballot that the whole thing is getting ridiculous.

A

Red Hering

20
Q

Set of reasons on a conclusion

A

Argument

21
Q

The claim or proposition the argument seeks to establish; what is at issue. Conclusions should be clear and rationally contestable.

A

Conclusion

22
Q

Reasons offered in support of the conclusion.

A

Premises

23
Q

Relatively factual data or grounds advanced in support of the claim. Usually reliable but must also be relevant.

A

Evidence

24
Q

Less reliable beliefs and assumptions used to support the conclusion.

A

Postulates

25
Q

Goals, preferences, and norms bearing on the conclusion, these are often implicit, not overtly stated.

A

Values

26
Q

Statements expressing plausible inferential leaps from premises toward conclusions,

A

Warrants

27
Q

Discretionary material that serves specialized purposes.

A

Accessories

28
Q

Non-reason giving parts of an argument that try to influence the audience. Usually omitted from argument analysis.

A

Rhetoric

29
Q

Words that indicated the degree of commitment or force with which the argument’s conclusion is proposed.

A

Rebuttals

30
Q

Material that tries to disarm possible objections to the argument.

A

Refutation

31
Q

Consist of a number of individual strands or lines of reasoning, each providing independent support for the conclusion. One strong line of reasoning could be enough to establish a claim.

A

Rope argument

32
Q

Consists of reasons that are independent like the links in a chain. Such arguments are no stronger than their weakest link.

A

Chain Argument