Exam 2 deck 2 Flashcards
Forms of reasoning that mislead by inviting one to hold conclusions more strongly than is justified by arguments advanced in their support.
Fallacies
People consider only one or few reasons, failing to recognize that many reasons can be offered for and against any conclusion.
Incompleteness
People only consider reasons supporting their favored side on an issue.
My-side bias
A few or atypical instances are used to reach a mistaken general conclusion.
Hasty Generalization
A good general rule or principle is applied to an exceptional case.
Sweeping Generalization
Similarity-based reasoning goes awry due to important, but unappreciated, dissimilarities.
Misleading Comparison
Events are explained in terms of hypothesized agents rather than their natural causes.
Pathetic Fallacy
Comparing human to non-human things.
Anthropomorphizing
the consequences of a conclusion improperly affects assessments of its truth.
Argument from consequences
An explanation of why a popular teenager died in a car accident: God decided to take him home to heaven.
Pathetic Fallacy
the percent should get rid of his advisor and run the government by himself. After all, too many cooks spoil the broth.
False Analogy, Sweeping Generalization
There must be life after death, because if there weren’t, there wouldn’t be any way of keeping people from doing whatever they wanted.
Argument from Consequences
When you thing of what some people have accomplished without a college education, you’ll agree that i’s a waste spending all that time and money to get a degree.
Hasty Generalization
A student, caught cheating on an exam, when asked to justify her behavior: Everyone does it.
Appeal to common practice
People should be responsible enough, during their working years to set aside the money they’ll need for retirement. I don’t see why we need to have social security or other government mandated retirement programs.
Naturalistic Fallacy