Ethnicity: Inside factors Flashcards
Inside factors effecting education
Teacher labelling and racsim
Pupils response to labelling
Ethnicentric curriculum
Education triage
Wright - Labelling - Black
Teachers label black students less able troublesome and disruptive which lead to SFP
Gillborn and Youdell - racism
‘Racialised expectations’ where they underestimate the ability of black students
Wright - Labelling - Asian
Asian pupils are more likely to be labelled as passive
Archer - pupil identity
teachers stereotype creating 3 different identities: Ideal pupil, Pathologies (quiet), Demonised (loud, challenging) ethnic minority groups are not ideal
Fuller - response to labelling
negative teacher labelling amongst yr 11 black girls however they rejected the labels and used it as a motivator
Sewell (2009) - response to labelling
Identified four responses to labelling:
Rebels
Conformists
Retreatists
Innovators
Rebels
Resist school and develop anti - school subcultures
Conformists
Keen to succeed and avoid being part of subcultures
Retreatists
Disconnect from school and subcultures, despised by rebels
Innovators
Pro education but anti school - value success but do not seek approval from teachers
Coard - ethnocentric curriculum
The school curriculum is ethnocentric, it is biased towards the viewpoint of a certain ethnic group (white)
what is the school curriculum ethnocentric in?
Involvement in classroom
School calendar
School meals
Uniform regulations
However of ethnocentric curriculum
impact is not clear as many Indian and Chinese pupils achieve above average
‘The myth of black challenge’
Black students are more likely to be labelled negatively and streamed into lower sets leading to SFP