EDUCATION: Class and education - Internal factors (Subcultures) Flashcards
Define pupil subculture
A group of pupils who have similar values and behaviour patterns
Lacey
- How do subcultures develop (2 keywords) and define them
Differentiation: is the process of teachers categorising pupils according to their perceived attitude / ability
Polarisation: The process where the pupil responds to streaming by moving towards one of the appropriate poles or streams
What study did Lacey conduct and what two subcultures were formed from this
- From a boys grammar school she found streaming polarised boys into a pro-school and anti-school subcultures
Pro-school subcultures
- Where are pupils places
- What status do they gain and how
- Mainly made up of what class
- Pupils placed in higher streams and remain committed to the values of the school
- Gain a high status in approved manner, through academic success and values which mirror the schools
- Mainly made up of MC pupils
Anti-school subculture
- Where are pupils places and why
- What status do they gain and what does this cause them to do
- Those in lower streams face a loss of self-esteem due to schools undermining them
- Given an inferior status by the school which pushes them into the direction of gaining a status, and flaunting schools rules instead
What problem does joining an anti-school subculture solve, but also arise at the same time
SOLVE: lack of status
ARISE: creates a further problem of self-fulfilling prophecy of educational failure
Hargreaves
- What study did he do and how did this impact students
- What was pupils solutions to this
STUDY: Responses to streaming and labelling within a secondary school showed bots in the lower stream were triple failures; they had failed their 11+ exam, were placed in low streams and labelled as ‘worthless louts’
SOLUTION: These pupils sought out other pupils like them, formed a group and gained a high status within the group by flaunting the school rules
- This formed a delinquent subculture which helped guarantee educational failure
Abolishing streaming - Ball
- What study did he conduct
- What did he find from this study
- What did he find continued
- What evidence is there proving this
- What does Balls study show as a conclusion
STUDY: studied a comprehensive school Beachride which was in the process of abolishing streaming
WHAT: When the school abolished banding, the basis for pupils to polarise into school subcultures was removed and the influence of anti-school subcultures declined
CONTINUED: Although polarisation disappeared, differentiation continued as teachers still categorised pupils differently and were likely to label MC pupils as able
EVIDENCE: The positive labels on MC students was evident in their high test results, showing that a self-fulfilling prophecy occurred
CONCLUSION: Class inequalities can continue as a result of teachers labelling, even without subcultures or streaming
What has the trend toward streaming and marketisation since the ERA mean cause
- Increase differentiation as there are now more opportunities for schools and teachers to differentiate pupils based on their class, ethnicity or gender and treat them equally
Pupil responses - Woods
- What are the 4 possible other responses to streaming and labelling other than pro and anti-school subcultures
- Ingratiation: Being the teachers pet
- Ritualism: Staying out of trouble
- Retreatism: Daydreaming and mucking about
- Rebellion: Outright rejection of everything the school stands for
Pupil responses - Furlong
- What does he discover about pupils responses
- Pupils responses are not just limited to only one, acting differently in different lessons and with different teachers