EDUCATION: Class and education - Internal factors (Labelling + self-fulfilling prophecy) Flashcards
What are the 4 key internal factors
- Labelling
- Self-fulfilling prophecy
- Streaming
- Subcultures
Who are the 4 main sociologists for labelling
+ any extra
Blue
Hummingbirds
Rush
Down + Garages
Ray + Just
Cant + Katch
- Becker
- Hempel - Jorgensen
- Rist
- Dunne and Gazeley
- Rosenthal and Jacobsen
- Cicourel and Kituse
Labelling - Becker
- What did he do, and what did he find
- Conclusion
WHAT: Interviewed 60 Chicago teachers
- found they judged students based on how well they fit the image of an ‘ideal pupil’
- The ideal pupil is based on things like pupils work, conduct and appearance + an elaborated speech code
CONCLUSION: Was found pupils from MC backgrounds were closest to the ideal pupil, leaving out WC pupils to be disadvantaged
Labelling - Hempel-Jorgensen - What did she argue - Examples - How were children defined What was the ideal pupil like So how were children ultimately defined
WHAT: Notions of the ideal pupil varied according to the social class make up of a school EXAMPLES / STUDY: In a mainly WC Aspen primary school, was a major discipline problem, - ideal child labelled as passive, quiet and obedient - children were defined in terms of behaviour, not ability
In mainly MC Rowan primary school, less discipline problems,
- ideal pupil defined in term of personality and academic ability rather than as being a ‘non misbehaving’ pupil like at Aspen
Labelling - Rist
- What did he argue
- How was this done in the school
WHAT: In an American kindergarten found the teacher used information on the Childs home background and appearance to place them in separate groups
HOW: seating each group at a different table
Fast learners / ‘tigers’ were mainly MC, neat appearance, seated near the teacher and received a lot of encouragement
- ‘Cardinals’ / ‘clowns’ were mainly WC and given lower level reading books and had less chances to show their abilities
Labelling - Contemporary example "Blinded by beauty" - When - Where - What does it say - How does it link to labelling
WHEN: February 2016
WHERE: Tes.com
WHAT: Says teachers perceptions of their students’ academic abilities could be skewed by how physically attractive they are
- Teachers may provide more time and encouragement to more good looking students
- Appearance of ill-health can influence a less capable of high-cognitive performance perception
HOW IT LINKS: Mr Talamas says “students can sense this, and it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy” and this also creates social class differences
Labelling - Dunne and Gazellen
- What did they find
- Why was this happening
WHAT: Teachers ‘normalised’ underachievement in WC pupils yet took a more active approach toward failing MC pupils
WHY: From children’s home background teachers labelled WC parents as uninterested in their childs education, thus presented more effort for MC pupils
- They also underestimated WC pupils potential and those seen as doing fairly well were ‘overachieving’
Explain the process of labelling
- Behaviour observed
- Label attached
- Behaviour is reinforced
- Label is reinforced
- Student internalises label
- Student accepts or rejects label
What does the process of labelling cause in the end?
A Self-fulfilling prophecy if the student accepts the label and behaves accordingly
What ‘criticisms’ can there be of the PROCESS of labelling
- There is no guarantee the student can’t reject the label
- Teachers perception of the student can change
What evidence is there of labelling in contemporary schools
- Streaming and setting
- Performance targets for students
- Gifted and talented programmes
- Educational triage
- Pupil premium
What positives points are there about labelling
- Useful in showing us that not all schools are neutral / fair institutions for cultural deprivation theorists
What criticisms are there about labelling
- Include Marxism
- Deterministic; assumes pupils who are labelled have no choice but to fulfil the prophecy / will always accept the labels
- Marxists argue labelling ignores the wider structures of power within which labelling takes place
- Marxists also say labelling is not a result of teachers own prejudices but of the fact they work in a school system which reproduces class inequalities
- Blames teachers for labelling pupils, but doesn’t give the full pictured explain why they label pupils
- External factors may influence what label is applies - eg due to family background etc