Crusades Flashcards
Calling of First Crusade Extra Information
Great Schism, 1054, HRE Henry IV appointed own Pope, 1076, Investiture contest. Most important is influence and rift, 1095, Alexios possibly planning invasion
Reasons for Collapse of Crusader States
(Divisions within ruling elite, Reynald of Chatillon, military failures 1887)- group into Crusader Weaknesses
Growing Muslim strength of unity
Lack of Western and Byzantine support+ shortage of manpower and resources
First Crusade- Evidence Against Increase Influence and Heal Rift
Not proven or mentioned + other factors
Crusader States- Western Aid
Genoa- given 1/3 of Arsuf, Caesarea and Acre, helped siege Acre, controlled large portion of trade. Venice- helped capture Tyre and Sidon, Crusade of 1101, Norwegian Crusade- helped siege Sidon
Limited Success of Third Crusade- Evidence Against Death of Barbarossa
Crusaders still had large, capable army- Acre, Arsuf Jaffa. Would not necessarily have solved P-R dispute (had been on bad terms even before Crusade)
Limited Success of Third Crusade- Evidence Against Leadership of Richard I
Victory at Acre, two year siege instantly ended- diplomacy before violence
Victory at Arsuf (reacted, not planned), defeated siege of Jaffa
Treaty of Jaffa- kept Acre and Jaffa
Limited Success of Third Crusade- Evidence For Muslim Strength
Forces and resources of Egypt and Syria, defended Jerusalem
First Crusade- Evidence For Muslim Weakness
Muslim world divided, power vacuum after Malik Shah, local warlords, Seljuks taking lands, Sunni vs Shi’a, Kilij Arslan underestimated Crusader force, Fatimid relief force decimated afterwards, Kerbogha disorganised+ desertions, no Syrian opposition- (conc. Muslim weakness and disunity)
First Crusade- Evidence For Crusader Leadership and Tactics
Bohemund won Dorylaeum, Godfrey won Jerusalem, Bohemund won Antioch
Reasons for the Success of the First Crusade
Muslim Weakness and Disunity, Byzantine Aid, Crusader Strengths (Crusader Leadership and Tactics, Crusader Motivation, Strength of Crusader Army)
Why did people go on the First Crusade?
Material gain, spiritual gain, social reasons
Limited Success of Third Crusade- Evidence For Lack of Resources
Barbarossa’s army left, Saladin had Egypt and Syria, may have been reason for failed sieges on Jerusalem
First Crusade- Evidence Against Strength of Crusader Army
Aided by Byzantium at Nicaea, Antioch only won through betrayal, Kerbogha’s forces disunited, no challenge from Syrians
Collapse of Crusader States- Evidence for Muslim Strength
Saladin united Syria and Egypt, took Damascus and Aleppo peacefully after Nur ad-Din had captured them
Took control of Egypt after 1164 invasion, gained Egyptian forces and resources
Nur ad-Din defeated RoA at Inab, 1149
30k vs 14k at Hattin
Saladin razed Jacob’s Ford, 1179- Jihad strengthened after illness in 85-86
First Crusade- Evidence Against Material Gain
Huge cost- more likely to lose than gain. Many firstborns with land participated- e.g. Stephen of Blois. ‘Handful stayed’ in East, ‘none came home laden with riches’. Many made donations, Godfrey mortgaged everything, 5x annual income to cover costs, supplying arms, etc.
Limited Success of Third Crusade- Evidence Against Muslim Strength
-Lost at Acre, Arsuf, Jaffa, prepared to leave and lose Jerusalem, Saladin’s reputation diminished
Consequences of the Third Crusade for the Islamic World
Saladin disbands armies 1192, dies 1193
Disappointment at continued Christian presence in Syria and Palestine
Civil wars among Ayyabids- successors of Saladin
Resisted two Christian attacks on Egypt
First Crusade- Social Reasons
Nature of feudal system- obligation to follow lord, reputation- enhanced status on return, love of fighting, exporting violence, racial hatred, help Christians in East
Limited Success of Third Crusade- Evidence For Death of Barbarossa
Had largest army- mostly went home, older than R1 and P2, could have led siege on Jerusalem
First Crusade- Evidence for Response to Alexios
Urban’s speech at Clermont, historians wrote about suffering of Eastern Christians, advancement of Turks on Byzantium, Turks has been sacking churches and moving on Byzantium
First Crusade- Evidence Against Crusader Leadership and Tactics
Stephen of Blois deserted, feud between Raymond and Bohemund, Raymond made deals with Fatimids, loyalty of army shifted back and forth. Had support at Nicaea, betrayal at Antioch, other factors, etc.
First Crusade- Evidence For Material Gain
Promises by Urban- ‘you will despoil their treasuries’. Famine in France, 1096. Crusaders ‘cherished a desire for Byzantium’. Land hunger of younger sons (Bohemund)
Reasons for Calling the First Crusade
Response to Alexios, Increase influence and heal rift, Peace of God
Second Crusade- Poor Leadership
Conrad couldn’t feed army, camp flooded, didn’t wait for Louis in Anatolia, had to retreat at Damascus, no prior contact with Crusader States, Conrad had to turn back past Dorylaeum, Louis abandoned army after Mount Cadmus, Conrad blamed Baldwin III for Damascus.
Second Crusade- Poor Relations with Byzantium
Crusader success would have weakened Byzantium, Roger of Sicily more likely to attack with Conrad gone- Manuel suspicious, Louis allied with Roger. Crusaders not invited by Manuel, who agreed treaty with Turks. Manuel did send shipping and guides, of limited use