Chapter 7 Flashcards
all groups have one thing in common
: Their members interact
why does jogging partners mean it is a group
there is an us and a them
why is the line between whats a group and whats not blurry
People who are merely in one another’s presence do sometimes influence one another.
In this chapter, we consider three examples of such collective influence: …. These three phenomena can occur with mini- mal interaction
social facili- tation, social loafing, and deindividuation
Then we will consider four examples of social influence in interacting groups: …
group polarization, groupthink, leadership, and minority influence.`
“Mere presence” means that the people are not competing, do not reward or punish, and in fact do nothing except be present as a passive audience or as ….
co-actors.
Arousal enhances whatever response tendency is …
dominant.
how can a response be dominant ?
Increased arousal enhances performance on easy tasks for which the most likely—“dominant”—response is correct.
If social arousal facilitates dominant responses, it should boost performance …
on easy tasks and hurt performance on difficult tasks.
in the presence of others, students took .. time to learn a simple maze and … to learn a complex one
less, more time
why do home teams win 6 in 10 games
social arousal
who is home team advanage good for
that home field was more of an advantage for good teams than for poor-performing teams.
** they found that British profes- sional soccer teams were more likely to tie their home games if they were poor-performing teams.
?
But does the presence of observers always arouse people?
no can just be comforting
how does number change audience influence
The effect of others’ presence increases with their number
why might an automatic procedure like speaking get hindered
Some- times, the arousal and self-conscious attention created by a large audience interferes even with well-learned, auto- matic behaviours, such as speaking.
Being in a crowd also intensifies negative reactions.
t or positive
crowding also enhances …
arousal
Crowding, then, has a similar effect to being observed by a crowd: what is this effect
It enhances arousal, which facilitates dominant responses.
Why Are We Aroused in the Presence of Others?
what are the 3 possible factors
evalua- tion apprehension, distraction, and mere presence.
T: surmised that observers make us apprehensive because we wonder how they are evaluating us.
evaluative apprehension
how was evauative apprehension tested?
examined social facilitation for the pronunciation of nonsense syllables and well-learned, easy-to-pronounce syllables.
The… we feel when being evaluated can also interfere with behaviours that we perform best automatically
self-consciousness
T: They theorized that when people wonder how co-actors are doing or how an audience is reacting, they get distracted.
driven by distraction
how does the theory that we are aroused by the presence of others explained by the distraction theory
This conflict between paying attention to others and paying attention to the task overloads our cognitive system, causing arousal.
. Recall that facilitation effects also occur with non-human creatures, such as cockroaches. which theory can explain this
the mere presence of others produces some arousal even without evaluation apprehension or arousing distraction.
Social facilitation theory has definitely generated the first two types of prediction: (1) The basics of the theory (…) have been confirmed, and (2) the theory has brought new life to a long-dormant field of research.
that the presence of others is arousing and that this social arousal enhances dominant responses
T: Do Individuals Exert Less Effort in a Group?
social loafing
Social facilitation usually occurs when people work toward… goals and when their efforts, whether winding fishing reels or solving math problems, can be … evaluated.
individual, individually
did those clapping alone vs social loafing know they were clapping less
no
In the group condition, people were tempted to …on the group effort.
free-ride
The group situation (rope pulling, shouting, and so forth) decreases evalua- tion apprehension. why?
When people are not accountable and cannot evaluate their own efforts, responsibility is diffused across all group members
When …, people self-consciously monitor their behaviour
made the centre of attention
So, when being observed increases …concerns, … occurs; when being lost in a crowd decreases evaluation concerns, …occurs
evaluation, social facilitation
social loafing
effort decreases as group size…
increases
people in collectivist cultures do, exhibit how much social loafing compared to individualist cultures
exhibit less social loafing
what is the key difference if someothing will lead to social loafing or facilitation
evaluation apprehension (if evaluated then yes apprehension and arousal)
woman social loaf less then men
t
another possible explanation of social loafing: When …, regardless of how much one contributes to the group, any individual gets more reward per unit of effort by free-riding on the group.
rewards are divided equally
when does a large group not social loaf
Sometimes, the goal is so compelling and maximum output from everyone is so essential that team spirit maintains or intensi- fies effort.
who works harder in group situations
. When people see others in their group as unreliable or as unable to contribute much, they work harder
But in many situ- ations, so do less capable individuals as they strive to keep up with others’ greater pro- ductivity
Group members will work hard when convinced that high effort will bring …
rewards
how do friends influence loafing
Groups also loaf less when their members are friends or are identified with or indis- pensable to their group
Even just expecting to interact with someone again serves to how does it influence efforts
increase efforts on team projects
When … and …. combine and normal inhibitions diminish, the results may be startling
arousal and diffused responsibility
abandon nor- mal restraints, to lose their sense of individual responsibility—:T
individuation
how is deindividuation effected when identifiable and will be prosecuted.
unaffected
How can we be sure that the effect of crowds means greater anonymity?
We can’t.
Asked to deliver electric shocks to a woman, they pressed the shock button twice as long as did women who were visible and wearing large …
name tags
how does self esteem effect autonomy
high self esteem more likely to hide behind their autonomy
why convertible with the top up honk less
more autonomous
cultures with … warriors were also the cultures that brutalized the enemy.
depersonalized
being anonymous makes one less … and more responsive to …,
self-conscious, cues present in the situation
can the effects of anonomous be positive too?
yes nurses
black-uniformed teams consistently ranked near the top of the National…
penalties
black = evil
expalin why hazing works on sports team
if it is difficult to become a member of the team, you will like it more once you become a member. The more effort we put into something, the more we appreciate it.
Aggressive outbursts by large crowds are often preceded by minor actions that …
arouse and divert people’s attention.
Group shouting, chanting, clapping, or dancing serve to both hype people up and reduce …
self-consciousness.
There is a self-reinforcing pleasure in doing an impulsive act while observing others doing it also. why?
When we see oth- ers act as we are acting, we think they feel as we do, which reinforces our own feelings
impulsive group action absorbs our …
attention.
Group experiences that diminish self-consciousness tend to disconnect … from …
behaviour from attitudes.
.. is the opposite of deindividuation.
Self-awareness
People who are self- aware, or who are temporarily made so, exhibit greater consistency between…
their words outside a situation and their deeds in it.
why must we be carful with group decision making
Because of the social influences working within them, groups can make poor decisions—decisions that sometimes have devastating consequences.
Studies of people in small groups have produced a principle that helps explain both bad and good outcomes: …
Group discussion often strengthens members’ initial inclina- tions.