Chapter 4 review Flashcards
What are the most recent supreme court decisions that had a significant impact on law enforcement and what are the facts of these cases?
1984 - Massachusetts V Sheppard & U.S. V Leon:
evidence obtained in good faith - illegally obtained by error was admissible
2001 - atwater V City of Largo Vista - 4th Amend. does not forbid warrantless arrest for minor criminal or traffic offense
Describe the three distinctive styles of law enforcement presented by james Q wilson:
Watchmen
legalistic
homogenous
what are the major difference between the strong mayor form of gov. and the city manager form of gov. as the relate to the app. of the police chief?
the relationship between chief and city manager are not as strong as app. by a strong mayor.
why can police chiefs not objectively and independently fulfill their responsibilities if they lack protection and often resist setting new goals and instituting org. change?
No contract protection - vision can jeopardize their job
police chief
removed by mayors in city managers
what are the two models of citizen oversight?
1) civilian review - board review - individual complaints
2) police auditors - monitor operations of police officer
what role do public interest organizations play in police accountability
attacking police misconduct
excessive force against african americans
describe some circumstances in which the police and the media might be in conflict
media feels they are not forethcoming - will reflect news as such
what were the facts of abner louima and amadou diallo cases as they relate to police brutality and political conflict w/ the community
tortured - sexually assaulted - biggest lawsuit & oversight (request for change)
briefly discuss the history of racial profiling in U.S.
1
what role should the local police play enforcing immigration laws in their communities?
1
Explain the significance of the u.s. supereme court decisions in each of the following cases Mapp V. Ohio: Gideon V. Wainwright Escobedo V. Illinois Miranda V. Arizona
Mapp - banned illegally seized evidence - unreasonable search and seizure (4th amendment) 1961
Gideon - 14th amendment to legal counsel app. to ll indigent defendants 1963
Escobedo - suspect in titled to confer with lawyer as soon as shift in investigation to accusatory 1964
Mirands - Requires officers to mirandize prior to questioning 1966
Some authorities believe that trends occurring from the 1960’s to the present have resulted in:
the partial nationalization of criminal justice
during the 1960’s the supreme court under the leader of Chief Justice Warren:
strengthened the rights of accused persons in criminal cases
The supreme court took an activist role during the period of ____ to ____. how did this change the role of the supreme court?
became a promulgator of the law instead of the interpreter.
1961-1966
Since Earl Warren’s Supreme court the court has become more ______.
conservative
The problem of the increase in crime came to the public through?
the media
Why did the supreme court’s role in the due process revolution take place?
Vacuum in which the police had failed to provide the necessary leadership
What did the Warren’s court provide?
necessary reform no matter how unpopular
What is Mapp v. Ohio?
court decision banned the use of illegally seized evidence in criminal cases in the states applied 4th Amendment - guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures
Gideon V. Wainwright 1963
equal protection under the 14th amendment requires legal counsel appointed to all indigent defendants.
Miranda V. Arizona
required police officers, before questioning suspects, to inform them of their constitutional right to remain silent, right to an attorney, right to have an attorney appointed
Escobedo V. Illinois
decisions affirmed that a suspect is entitled to confer with an attorney as soon as focus shifts from investigation to suspect