Chapter 3 Attachment - Explanations of attachment: Learning theory Flashcards
Cupboard love theory (Dollard & Miller)
Learning theory - Classical conditioning?
- Caregiver (neutral stimulus) associated with food (unconditioned stimulus).
- Caregiver becomes conditioned stimulus.
Learning theory - Operant conditioning?
Crying behaviour reinforced positively for baby and negatively for caregiver.
Learning theory - Attachment as a secondary drive?
Attachment becomes a secondary drive through association with hunger.
Evaluation of the learning theory - Counter-evidence from animal studies? L
Lorenz & Harlow showed that feeding is not the key to attachment.
Evaluation of the learning theory - Counter-evidence from studies on humans? L
Primary attachment figure not always person who does feeding (Schaffer & Emerson), quality of attachment related to interactional synchrony not feeding (Isabella et al).
Evaluation of the learning theory - Some conditioning may be involved? S
- Conditioning (association with comfort) may influence the choice of primary attachment figure.
- CP is that babies are more active in attachment than conditioning explanations suggest (Feldman & Eidelman).
Evaluation of the learning theory - Social learning theory? X
Involves modelling attachment behaviours, includes role of active baby (Hay & Vespo).
Evaluations of the learning theory? (SLLX)
S - Some conditioning may be involved
L - Counter-evidence from animal studies
L - Counter-evidence from studies on humans
X - Social learning theory