Chapter 1 Social Influence - Conformity Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Conformity - Asch´s research - Baseline procedure?

A

123 men judged line lengths. Confederates deliberately gave wrong answers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Conformity - Asch´s research - Findings?

A

Naive pts conformed on 36.8% of trials. 25% never conformed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Conformity - Asch´s research - Variations?

A
  • Group size - Varied group size from 2 to 16. Conformity increased up to 3, then levelled off.
  • Unaminity - Placed a dissenter (conf) in the group. Conformity rate reduced.
  • Task difficulty - Made line lengths more similar. Conformity increased when task was harder (ISI).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Conformity - Evaluation of Asch´s research - Artifical situation & task? WEAK

A

Pts knew this was a study so they just played along with a trivial task.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Conformity - Evaluation of Asch´s research - Limited application? WEAK

A

Research only conducted on American men.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Conformity - Evaluation of Asch´s research - Research support? STRONG

A

Lucas et al found more conformity when maths problems were harder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Conformity - Evaluation of Asch´s research - Ethical issues? WEAK/STRONG

A

Research may help avoid mindless conformity, but pts were decieved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Types & Explanations - Types of conformity - Internalisation?

A

Private & public acceptance of group norms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Types & Explanations - Types of conformity - Identification?

A

Change behaviour to be part of a group we identify with, may change privately too.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Types & Explanations - Types of conformity - Compliance?

A

Go along with group publicly but no private change.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Types & Explanations - Explanations of conformity - Informational social influence (ISI)?

A

Conform to be right. Assume group knows better than us.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Types & Explanations - Explanations of conformity - Normative social influence (NSI)?

A

Conform to be liked or accepted by group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Types & Explanations - Evaluation - Research support for NSI? STRONG

A

When no normative group pressure (wrote answers), conformity down to 12.5% (Asch).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Types & Explanations - Evaluation - Research support for ISI? STRONG

A

Pts relied on other people´s answers to hard maths problems (Lucas et al).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Types & Explanations - Evaluation - Individual differences in NSI? WEAK

A

nAffiliators want to be liked more, so conform more (McGhee & Teevan).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Types & Explanations - Evaluation - Is the NSI/ISI distinction useful? WEAK/STRONG

A

NSI/ISI distinction may not be useful but Asch´s research supports both.

17
Q

Conformity to social roles - Zimbardo´s research - The Stanford prison experiment?

A
  • Mock prison with 21 student volunteers, randomly assigned as guards or prisoners.
  • Conformity to social roles created through unforms (e.g. loose smocks, carrying wooden club) & instructions about behaviour (e.g. guards have power).
18
Q

Conformity to social roles - Zimbardo´s research - Findings related to social roles?

A
  • Guards became increasingly brutal, prisoners´rebellion put down & prisoners became depressed.
  • Study stopped after 6 days.
19
Q

Conformity to social roles - Zimbardo´s research - Conclusions related to social roles?

A

Pts strongly conformed to their social roles.

20
Q

Conformity to social roles - Evaluation of Zimbardo´s research - Control? STRONG

A

Random assignment to roles increased internal validity.

21
Q

Conformity to social roles - Evaluation of Zimbardo´s research - Lack of realism? WEAK

A
  • Pts play-acted their roles according to media-derived stereotypes (Banuazizi & Movahedi).
  • Counterpoint - evidence prisoners thought prison was real to them e.g. 90% conversations about prison (McDermott).
22
Q

Conformity to social roles - Evaluation of Zimbardo´s research - Exaggerates the power of roles? WEAK

A

Only 1/3 of guards were brutal so conclusions exaggerated (Fromm).