Chapter 1 Social Influence - Conformity Flashcards
Conformity - Asch´s research - Baseline procedure?
123 men judged line lengths. Confederates deliberately gave wrong answers.
Conformity - Asch´s research - Findings?
Naive pts conformed on 36.8% of trials. 25% never conformed.
Conformity - Asch´s research - Variations?
- Group size - Varied group size from 2 to 16. Conformity increased up to 3, then levelled off.
- Unaminity - Placed a dissenter (conf) in the group. Conformity rate reduced.
- Task difficulty - Made line lengths more similar. Conformity increased when task was harder (ISI).
Conformity - Evaluation of Asch´s research - Artifical situation & task? WEAK
Pts knew this was a study so they just played along with a trivial task.
Conformity - Evaluation of Asch´s research - Limited application? WEAK
Research only conducted on American men.
Conformity - Evaluation of Asch´s research - Research support? STRONG
Lucas et al found more conformity when maths problems were harder.
Conformity - Evaluation of Asch´s research - Ethical issues? WEAK/STRONG
Research may help avoid mindless conformity, but pts were decieved.
Types & Explanations - Types of conformity - Internalisation?
Private & public acceptance of group norms.
Types & Explanations - Types of conformity - Identification?
Change behaviour to be part of a group we identify with, may change privately too.
Types & Explanations - Types of conformity - Compliance?
Go along with group publicly but no private change.
Types & Explanations - Explanations of conformity - Informational social influence (ISI)?
Conform to be right. Assume group knows better than us.
Types & Explanations - Explanations of conformity - Normative social influence (NSI)?
Conform to be liked or accepted by group.
Types & Explanations - Evaluation - Research support for NSI? STRONG
When no normative group pressure (wrote answers), conformity down to 12.5% (Asch).
Types & Explanations - Evaluation - Research support for ISI? STRONG
Pts relied on other people´s answers to hard maths problems (Lucas et al).
Types & Explanations - Evaluation - Individual differences in NSI? WEAK
nAffiliators want to be liked more, so conform more (McGhee & Teevan).